I'm split, so I'll leave it up to you guys.

That was too hard. I said Goto, because Disciple can atleat become jedi. (although I dont use him if I play as woman)

We at least agree on something.

 

I actually never hated Disciple. He's annoying at times and sometimes insufferably lecturing, but otherwise he was okay, especially if you play a male Exile...

 

But I hate GOTO. Completely useless and good only for his revelation if you built influence with him. Oh, and a few measely credits. You don't need them, but it's what he's good for... I like the voice-acting, but hate the character. Used him even less in K2 than I did T3 in K1, which speaks volumes... "

Goto.

neither. My vote is going to Kreia.

Disciple...

 

DN

There is no both option. They are both bad.

Yes, but who is worse?

G0-T0. You actually had POTENTIAL to use Disciple for something, G0-T0 was just a filler-character, absolutely ridiculous.

i wish they didnt replace that other person with Disciple

what no hanharr? what worst then a talking carpet?

what no hanharr? what worst then a talking carpet?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Two talking carpets "

 

Personally I find GoTo the more useless out of the two. At least I can opt not to take Disciple by playing as a LSM, as others have already said.

GOTO died atleast

 

but untill that point you where stuck with the pile of bolts which was of no use

G0T0, for no one's surprise.

Hanharr is also a very bad character, but NOTHING in the entire univers can come close to that useless flying ball.

Edited April 23, 200619 yr by Bulgarian Jedi

he was only good for helping the exile pwn those guys in the arena, better then mira in that scene for that case, but then hanhaar cant be a jedi, and talking to a wookie is annoying

-Opens GO-TO's front panel, shoves an ion charge in, closes panel, hits detonator-

Tough choice. I've only played the game once so far, and G0-T0 was a non-entity in it. Yes he was in my party, and there were a couple of cutscenes, etc. But I never talked to him, or took him with me whenever I left the Ebon Hawk. The only time he factored into the game at all was when it wasn't my choice. So in that sense I could say he's worse. He may as well not have been there.

 

I talked to Disciple alot. Several times, he was one of the two companions I chose to take with me from the Ebon Hawk. I made him a Jedi, etc. All of that interaction was enough to decide I didn't really like him all that much. So in that sense, I could say he's worse.

 

EDIT: I choose not to vote.

Edited April 23, 200619 yr by mr insomniac

We at least agree on something.

 

I actually never hated Disciple. He's annoying at times and sometimes insufferably lecturing, but otherwise he was okay, especially if you play a male Exile... 

 

But I hate GOTO. Completely useless and good only for his revelation if you built influence with him. Oh, and a few measely credits. You don't need them, but it's what he's good for... I like the voice-acting, but hate the character. Used him even less in K2 than I did T3 in K1, which speaks volumes...  "

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

This is precisely why in K3 I want quality over quantity. It appears that characters such as T3-M4 in K1 and GO-TO in K2 were 'a waste of space' and un-necessary and I honestly beleive that in K2 there were too many party members, some were just un-necessary or useless or un-interesting characters. My point of all this is because Obsidian were forced to rush K2 because of greedy LucasArts, hence we get characters with unfinished stories they could of just cut characters such as Bao-Dur and GO-TO entirely from the game so they had more 'time' to focus on developing the other more interestng characters.

 

I hear so many people say how they want K3 to be huge and they want this and that and blah blah blah, well I guess I want K3 to be at least a fairly lengthy game too however you folks all should take into consideration that in order to make a long, good, finished game that doesn't have many bugs/glitches first of all the game developers would need a lot of time to make the game and do you guys seriously think that LucasArts would give the game developers two and a half-three years to make a large scale game like K3? Fat chance of that happening, they are far too greedy and don't seem to care about the fans, all they seem to care about is the size of their pockets.

 

So my point of all this is I'd rather see seven or eight rich, well-written, detailed and interesting party member characters in K3 than twelve-fourteen half-baked, rushed, incomplete, ****house characters, do you guys agree with me here? Quality over quantity I say...

 

But to get on topic my vote goes to Disciple, I think he's more of a worse character than what GO-TO is, however I don't think either of these characters are the worst characters in K2, I think the worst character in K2, well as far as party members go anyway is Visas.

 

(Runs from angry mob of Visas lovers)!

Edited April 23, 200619 yr by The Architect

It appears that characters such as T3-M4 in K1 and GO-TO in K2 were 'a waste of space' and un-necessary and I honestly beleive that in K2 there were too many party members, some were just un-necessary or useless or un-interesting characters. My point of all this is because Obsidian were forced to rush K2 because of greedy LucasArts, hence we get characters with unfinished stories they could of just cut characters such as Bao-Dur and GO-TO entirely from the game so they had more 'time' to focus on developing the other more interestng characters.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

Yes. I actually prefer a lower number of companions that are exceedingly well characterized in K3. I don't want more characters than I can have in my part at one time. If I can have only two companions with me, then I want only two in the game. Well, maybe what I can have with me plus one, so that one can be left out for "looking after the Ebon Hawk" or whatever. It's an excuse, but I'd buy it in that case. I won't buy it if six out of eight companions stay on the ship simply because the game won't allow me to bring them along. The worst part of K2 was when you encountered Bao-Dur and had to throw either Kreia or Atton out of the group, because you could have only two people in the group with the Exile at point, and Bao-Dur had to be there. I always threw Atton out, but what did he do during that time? He just followed us half a mile's distance or what? That's just silly...

 

I hear so many people say how they want K3 to be huge and they want this and that and blah blah blah

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

I actually more get the impression that want it to be huge in scope. You know, shattering the galaxy, deciding fates for millions of people, etc. K2 is almost a secret war, which is what I think people want to move away from - the secret war has to be exposed. I agree with that. But yes, quality over quantity. Always.

 

I think the worst character in K2, well as far as party members go anyway is Visas.

 

(Runs from angry mob of Visas lovers)!

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

(chases after The Architect with a pitchfork)

Yes. I actually prefer a lower number of companions that are exceedingly well characterized in K3. I don't want more characters than I can have in my part at one time. If I can have only two companions with me, then I want only two in the game. Well, maybe what I can have with me plus one, so that one can be left out for "looking after the Ebon Hawk" or whatever. It's an excuse, but I'd buy it in that case. I won't buy it if six out of eight companions stay on the ship simply because the game won't allow me to bring them along. The worst part of K2 was when you encountered Bao-Dur and had to throw either Kreia or Atton out of the group, because you could have only two people in the group with the Exile at point, and Bao-Dur had to be there. I always threw Atton out, but what did he do during that time? He just followed us half a mile's distance or what? That's just silly... 

 

Exactly! If we are going to have anything ranging from six-ten party members in K3, well you should either be able to take all of your companions save one to "look after the Ebon Hawk" with you or make it that your kind of forced to take certain party members with you on certain planets because some party members won't leave the Ebon Hawk because of various difference reasons that has to be at least associated with the planet itself. For example, Mandalore might stay on the Ebon Hawk because the planet your on was attacked by the Mandalorians during the Mandalorian Wars and the locals all hate the Mandalorians and would recognize Mandalore's armour and try and kill him and because you might be doing a mission where your not supposed to get into trouble with local authorities or draw a lot of attention Mandalore decides to stay on the Ebon Hawk, well something along those lines anyway, you get my point. Or the other case scenario is to simply reduce the amount of party members you have.

 

 

I actually more get the impression that want it to be huge in scope. You know, shattering the galaxy, deciding fates for millions of people, etc. K2 is almost a secret war, which is what I think people want to move away from - the secret war has to be exposed. I agree with that. But yes, quality over quantity. Always.

 

Hmm, I would agree that K3 needs to be more epic than K2 but as far as the plot-outline is concerned, the galaxy is really messed up and needs to be re-organized, cleaned up and united before we get any large-scale battles. Now, a huge epic, climatic ending/s would be ideal because it could bring about closure to a fantastic trilogy and consolidate for the cut-ending of TSL.

 

 

 

(chases after The Architect with a pitchfork) 

 

 

(You have me cornered, I'm defenceless, the anger and hatred is easily recognizable by your aggressive hand gestures and facial expressions  :angry:  ,you want to etch your pitchfork into my skull because of my negative comments about Visas , in a desperate plea to save my own butt, I say "I don't really hate Visas Jediphile, you have to beleive me. The fat one made me do it! It's all his fault! He's the one you want, not me!"  :">  :'(  To be continued...

 

 

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Edited April 23, 200619 yr by The Architect

I never use GO-TO, or T3, just cos the droids are crap. At least HK looks good. Therefore, my vote goes to GO-TO :D

 

Also, Disciple can be used as an alternative to Kreia, and thats never bad.

Also, Disciple can be used as an alternative to Kreia, and thats never bad.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

 

They are not the same. Kreia gives bonus xp (and so is usually in my active group), while the Disciple merely allows you to restore your force points. Damn useful, yes, but not the same.

I quite liked Visas, but she did seem kinda weak in combat. I dunno, maybe I just didn't give her good force powers, etc.

As usual G0T0 is on the losing end.

goto for the win