Lucius Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 Melodramatic as always Colrom. Funny that the bomb-in-turban cartoon wasn't even noticed till the scumbag Imams toured the middle east with a few of their own added. DENMARK! It appears that I have not yet found a sig to replace the one about me not being banned... interesting.
Colrom Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 taks, What's the source for the info on Hayes? I hadn't read that! As dark is the absence of light, so evil is the absence of good. If you would destroy evil, do good. Evil cannot be perfected. Thank God.
Colrom Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 (edited) Ah! Fox News ( ) : http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,188463,00.html Also a mention of a "mild" stroke in January in another source - in connection with the word "exhaustion". Strange association - unless one is talking about "heat stroke" which is not a stroke at all so far as I know. Edited March 20, 2006 by Colrom As dark is the absence of light, so evil is the absence of good. If you would destroy evil, do good. Evil cannot be perfected. Thank God.
metadigital Posted March 20, 2006 Posted March 20, 2006 Stroke is a blood clot, that causes a loss of circulation and localized damage: it can occur anywhere (Deep Veined Thrombosis, a.k.a. Economy Class Syndrome, is a clot caused by the subtle change of circulation in the leg in suseptible people from unusual pressure OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
Pope Posted March 23, 2006 Posted March 23, 2006 I just read they're going to take revenge on Isaac Hayes by making Chef a pedophile and getting him killed.
kumquatq3 Posted March 23, 2006 Posted March 23, 2006 ^That was last nights episode....not as bad as it sounds, but it has a surprise ending Solid episode tho
kumquatq3 Posted March 23, 2006 Posted March 23, 2006 SPOILER In case you want to know the surprise ending to the episode, click here SPOILER
alanschu Posted March 23, 2006 Posted March 23, 2006 (edited) I think the intelligence of a show like South Park is severely understated. They poke fun at current events like no tomorrow. As for them picking sides, for the most part they pick on both sides quite a bit. Maybe it's because it has a longer length, but the South Park movie (as well as Team America) definitely fall into this category. Edited March 23, 2006 by alanschu
Surreptishus Posted March 23, 2006 Posted March 23, 2006 I just read they're going to take revenge on Isaac Hayes by making Chef a pedophile and getting him killed. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ^That was last nights episode....not as bad as it sounds, but it has a surprise ending Solid episode tho <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The episode was actually a tribute to Chef.
kumquatq3 Posted March 23, 2006 Posted March 23, 2006 The episode was actually a tribute to Chef. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> And a big **** you to him and scientology, but ya, still a tribute
metadigital Posted March 23, 2006 Posted March 23, 2006 I just read they're going to take revenge on Isaac Hayes by making Chef a pedophile and getting him killed. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> That's actually very clever writing; paedophiles are (unfortunately) very adept at belnding into the community and using their camouflage to achieve a postion of trust, and when they are finally outed it can be a tremendous shock to everyone. OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
Musopticon? Posted March 23, 2006 Posted March 23, 2006 Salty chocolate balls indeed. kirottu said: I was raised by polar bears. I had to fight against blood thirsty wolves and rabid penguins to get my food. Those who were too weak to survive were sent to Sweden. It has made me the man I am today. A man who craves furry hentai. So let us go and embrace the rustling smells of unseen worlds
alanschu Posted March 24, 2006 Posted March 24, 2006 (edited) The episode was actually a tribute to Chef. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> And a big **** you to him and scientology, but ya, still a tribute <{POST_SNAPBACK}> No, they explicitly said that they shouldn't blame Chef, but that "silly little club he joined." It's during the Eulogy! :D Edited March 24, 2006 by alanschu
kumquatq3 Posted March 24, 2006 Posted March 24, 2006 It's during the Eulogy! :D <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You mean that part after they rip him limb from limb....... excellent point there <_<
alanschu Posted March 24, 2006 Posted March 24, 2006 That's just unfortunate circumstance. I consider his death to be the goofy, slapstick "toilet humour" of the show. Hayes is no longer a part of it, so they found a way to right him out in a ridiculous way.
Gromnir Posted March 24, 2006 Posted March 24, 2006 (edited) hey now, maybe some of you should try to be nicer... after all, scientologists is all that stands between you and the dark overlord Xenu. ... over the years we has chosen to defend the rights of some pretty wacky religions. the iskocn and pentecostal snake handling sects and moonies and bhagwan shree rajneesh followers is just a few of the peoples who has gotten help from Gromnir. will defend your rights even if we thinks your religion is kooky. truthfully, we thinks that scientology is a hoot. anybody here feels bad that john travolta and tom cruise got taken by some yutz who , while he may have been a "virtually a pathological liar" 'bout his military record and his education, were no doubt completely honest 'bout his new religion. HA! http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Library/Shelf/la90/la90-1a1.html is a fun read. HA! Good Fun! Edited March 24, 2006 by Gromnir "If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence."Justice Louis Brandeis, Concurring, Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927) "Im indifferent to almost any murder as long as it doesn't affect me or mine."--Gfted1 (September 30, 2019)
metadigital Posted March 24, 2006 Posted March 24, 2006 Scientology became a religion after L.Ron Hubbard's Dianetics failed to make money ... tax-free status of religion was very appealing ... " OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
Deadly_Nightshade Posted March 24, 2006 Posted March 24, 2006 I think it's just a scam... "Geez. It's like we lost some sort of bet and ended up saddled with a bunch of terrible new posters on this forum." -Hurlshot
LadyCrimson Posted March 25, 2006 Posted March 25, 2006 Has anyone here actually read Dianetics? I did years ago...it was actually kind of interesting in a "one man theorizing out of his nose to sell books/prove how gullible people are" kind of way. But Scientology the organized religion - they're horrible. Not because they believe in whatever they want to believe in, but because of the cult like aspect. I've known several people who've been harassed and hounded by Scientology "offices" when they joined and then quit - it borders on the threatening. As to the South Park guy quitting...yeah, I read that a bit ago...hypocrisy at it's finest...that or a good example of organized cult pressure....or both... “Things are as they are. Looking out into the universe at night, we make no comparisons between right and wrong stars, nor between well and badly arranged constellations.” – Alan Watts
metadigital Posted March 25, 2006 Posted March 25, 2006 L Ron Hubbard hated psychiatry, and he has a point: most of the mental defectives that specialise in it are only there to because they wanted to understand why they were so screwed up in the first place. Problem is, Scientology now uses psychometric tests to tell people what they need to hear to get them to join the group. Cynical? Yes. Effective? Also yes. Did they get me (even with a pretty girl) off the street? No. (I did get a chuckle out of the test, though.) OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
LadyCrimson Posted March 25, 2006 Posted March 25, 2006 I don't hate psychiatry but from my personal experiences I don't exactly believe in it either...at least from the psychological talky treatment point of view. Some of the physical/brain research of recent years has been intriguing tho. There's a big difference between theoretical pop psychology and the more, uh...'hard' science of the brain. I hate Dr. Phil. :D “Things are as they are. Looking out into the universe at night, we make no comparisons between right and wrong stars, nor between well and badly arranged constellations.” – Alan Watts
metadigital Posted March 25, 2006 Posted March 25, 2006 Indeed, the "hard science" of brain anatomy, for example, is indistinguishable from any other anatomical or biological science. The problem has always been that humans are very difficult to study, and the brain is EASILY the most complex thing in our known universe, so making quick assumptions OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
LadyCrimson Posted March 25, 2006 Posted March 25, 2006 People are fond of the promise & lure of quick fixes/answers. Hard science doesn't fall into that category, although the drug companies would like to make people believe it to be so. “Things are as they are. Looking out into the universe at night, we make no comparisons between right and wrong stars, nor between well and badly arranged constellations.” – Alan Watts
metadigital Posted March 25, 2006 Posted March 25, 2006 A pill for every ill! OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now