Gabrielle Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 THAC0 is To Hit Armor Class 0. Explanation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volourn Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 Thac0 = To Hit Armour Class Zero DWARVES IN PROJECT ETERNITY = VOLOURN HAS PLEDGED $250. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoneWolf16 Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 THAC0 is To Hit Armor Class 0. Explanation <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Thac0 = To Hit Armour Class Zero <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Thank you. I had thought that some of nature's journeymen had made men and not made them well, for they imitated humanity so abominably. - Book of Counted Sorrows 'Cause I won't know the man that kills me and I don't know these men I kill but we all wind up on the same side 'cause ain't none of us doin' god's will. - Everlast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitch Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 I have issues with both systems, clerics are too powerful in 3.5, they shouldn't be able to fight and cast 9th level spells. And the old AC system and thac0 was near indecipherable. Plus there were too many restrictions. And I hate all versions of the monk. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I'm playing a cleric in a game using 3.5 rules right now and he's near invulnerable. It's amazing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weiser_Cain Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 See, I told yah. Yaw devs, Yaw!!! ( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumjalum Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 The monk equivelent is the Oathsworn and only when he has an oath to oblidge does he have any class abilities. Other than that he is no more threatening than a commoner. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Sounds like lots of fun, does he just hang around baking bread until someone calls him on an oath? We now bring you live footage from the World Championship Staring Final. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volourn Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 "I'm playing a cleric in a game using 3.5 rules right now and he's near invulnerable. It's amazing." DM sucks. DWARVES IN PROJECT ETERNITY = VOLOURN HAS PLEDGED $250. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weiser_Cain Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 It's an unbalanced class, nothing a DM could do without cheating. Yaw devs, Yaw!!! ( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darque Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 I doubt it. Any class can be optimized. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moose Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 Nerfed to oblivion There are none that are right, only strong of opinion. There are none that are wrong, only ignorant of facts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volourn Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 "It's an unbalanced class, nothing a DM could do without cheating." Nonsense. There are many ways to deal with clerics (or any class) without cheating or nerfing the rules. DWARVES IN PROJECT ETERNITY = VOLOURN HAS PLEDGED $250. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Hades Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 Usually the oathsworn makes an oath him or herself. Such as "I sahll avenge the death of *insert name here*" Or "As long as I draw breath none shall pass without my permission" and so forth and so on. High level oathsworn are practically immortal as long as they have an oath to to fulfill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanschu Posted January 19, 2006 Share Posted January 19, 2006 I love that Harm spell of theirs... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabrielle Posted January 20, 2006 Share Posted January 20, 2006 I doubt it. Any class can be optimized. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Doubtful. Smells like a wee bit of cheating. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darque Posted January 20, 2006 Share Posted January 20, 2006 Nope Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabrielle Posted January 20, 2006 Share Posted January 20, 2006 Explain plz? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darque Posted January 20, 2006 Share Posted January 20, 2006 Explain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now