WinterSun Posted December 23, 2005 Posted December 23, 2005 What you need for taking out rival band members: \,,/ \,,/ master of my domain Pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo.
random evil guy Posted December 23, 2005 Posted December 23, 2005 I bet this could beat you Hind: The AH-64D Apache <{POST_SNAPBACK}> maybe, but it is still ugly as hell...
random evil guy Posted December 23, 2005 Posted December 23, 2005 isn't it lovely? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The Tupolew Tu-160 is a fine aircraft...but let's face it, it's a copycat of the B1 Lancer, just like they did with the B-29, observe: maybe, but it is bigger, faster and cooler! besides, the b-1b was 'based' on tu-22 backfire...
11XHooah Posted December 23, 2005 Author Posted December 23, 2005 Now for my WW2 favorites: The M1A1 Thompson And the M1 Garand Beautiful, aren't they War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. --John Stewart Mill-- "Victory was for those willing to fight and die. Intellectuals could theorize until they sucked their thumbs right off their hands, but in the real world, power still flowed from the barrel of a gun.....you could send in your bleeding-heart do-gooders, you could hold hands and pray and sing hootenanny songs and invoke the great gods CNN and BBC, but the only way to finally open the roads to the big-eyed babies was to show up with more guns." --Black Hawk Down-- MySpace: http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fusea...iendid=44500195
Moose Posted December 23, 2005 Posted December 23, 2005 (edited) we need to get Mr. Kalashnikov back to making guns :'( <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Those guns really look the business, but I hear the performance is to be laughed at. Edited December 23, 2005 by Moose There are none that are right, only strong of opinion. There are none that are wrong, only ignorant of facts
kirottu Posted December 23, 2005 Posted December 23, 2005 From that era: Machinegun Suomi M/31 This post is not to be enjoyed, discussed, or referenced on company time.
Calax Posted December 23, 2005 Posted December 23, 2005 we need to get Mr. Kalashnikov back to making guns :'( <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Those guns really look the business, but I hear the performance is to be laughed at. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> actually the performance is quite good. It could out perform the origional M16's in any condition. Victor of the 5 year fan fic competition! Kevin Butler will awesome your face off.
Kinslayer Posted December 23, 2005 Posted December 23, 2005 Those guns really look the business, but I hear the performance is to be laughed at. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I don't know where you heard that , but if its performance was laughable then it certainly wouldn't be the number one assault rifle since 1947... Here's the world's finnest submarine, the new $3.2 billion seawolf-class submarine:
Gfted1 Posted December 23, 2005 Posted December 23, 2005 (edited) * Hooah here's a thing that could beat your delta version of the AH-64: Too bad they cancelled the Comanche program. :n: Mmmm, ridiculous firepower. Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) Edited December 23, 2005 by Gfted1 "I'm your biggest fan, Ill follow you until you love me, Papa"
Moose Posted December 23, 2005 Posted December 23, 2005 we need to get Mr. Kalashnikov back to making guns :'( <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Those guns really look the business, but I hear the performance is to be laughed at. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> actually the performance is quite good. It could out perform the origional M16's in any condition. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Really? I heard the AK-47 has one of the all time lowest accuracies for an assault rifle, having not taken it to be a factor in the design. There are none that are right, only strong of opinion. There are none that are wrong, only ignorant of facts
moreKOTORplz Posted December 23, 2005 Posted December 23, 2005 not to mention the Ak has become the poster gun of every crap trained army and terrorist organization. no thank you toss me my m-16 (AMERICA **** yea)
LoneWolf16 Posted December 23, 2005 Posted December 23, 2005 The Russian AK-47 is much for durable than its American counterpart...the original M-16 issued during the Vietnam conflict would get jammed if even the slightest bit of dirt were to get into its parts (Soldiers actually started to tie condoms onto the tops of their rifles to protect them) whereas the AK could be buried in muck for a few days, picked up, and fired without any problem. AK's Strength - It's simplicity of design. M-16's Strength - Superior accuracy. AK's Weakness - Accuracy is...not so good at range. M-16's Weakness - Inherent complexity/too many moving parts. Also, the AK is much better for melee combat, having a much, much heavier wood and steel frame, where the M-16 is made of space-age plastic. Basically: AK = Machine gun with rifle capability. M-16 = Rifle with machine gun capability. Which one is better depends on the situation in which you're using the weapon. I had thought that some of nature's journeymen had made men and not made them well, for they imitated humanity so abominably. - Book of Counted Sorrows 'Cause I won't know the man that kills me and I don't know these men I kill but we all wind up on the same side 'cause ain't none of us doin' god's will. - Everlast
Krookie Posted December 23, 2005 Posted December 23, 2005 The M1A1 Carbine is my favorite WWII weapon.
moreKOTORplz Posted December 23, 2005 Posted December 23, 2005 The Russian AK-47 is much for durable than its American counterpart...the original M-16 issued during the Vietnam conflict would get jammed if even the slightest bit of dirt were to get into its parts (Soldiers actually started to tie condoms onto the tops of their rifles to protect them) whereas the AK could be buried in muck for a few days, picked up, and fired without any problem. AK's Strength - It's simplicity of design. M-16's Strength - Superior accuracy. AK's Weakness - Accuracy is...not so good at range. M-16's Weakness - Inherent complexity/too many moving parts. Also, the AK is much better for melee combat, having a much, much heavier wood and steel frame, where the M-16 is made of space-age plastic. Basically: AK = Machine gun with rifle capability. M-16 = Rifle with machine gun capability. Which one is better depends on the situation in which you're using the weapon. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> greatness always has bugs at first.... besides ITS A RIFLE NOT A SWORD if you can't use a rifle at range its not a rifle and i would hope your goal is not to use a dam rifle for melee your right its a great gun (unchanged since creation) and classic soviet design (dependable in all conditions and efficient)
Calax Posted December 23, 2005 Posted December 23, 2005 47's bigger brother the AK 74! Victor of the 5 year fan fic competition! Kevin Butler will awesome your face off.
moreKOTORplz Posted December 23, 2005 Posted December 23, 2005 the core model is still being used is what i mean't
Calax Posted December 23, 2005 Posted December 23, 2005 kinda... The 47 is what is so popular because the soviets were making them by the thousand for years. Thus when they had an economic crash they sold as many as they could. The 47 also had some problems in building them. Mainly that they took a block of steel and then just cut it into the right shape and size. the 74 fixes this by the fact that it has machined pieces like the m16 and it also has a longer barrel (allowing for better acc.). The 74 is not used as much because it's a russian only rifle and the russians are not exactly what we'd call military marvels that everyone knows about. (tho the spetznaz rock!) over all the 74 just took somthing good and made it better. On a side note Kalashnikov (the designer of the AK 47) made his first gun during WWII but it was turned down because of some buracratic reason. His first gun was much better than the ones that the soviets used during the Stalingrad fight. Victor of the 5 year fan fic competition! Kevin Butler will awesome your face off.
Lucius Posted December 23, 2005 Posted December 23, 2005 AK-101 pwns your yankee gunz. :ph34r: BTW. I DENMARK! It appears that I have not yet found a sig to replace the one about me not being banned... interesting.
Darth_Schmarth Posted December 23, 2005 Posted December 23, 2005 (edited) This thread is so totally Yank. Edited December 23, 2005 by Darth_Schmarth ^Asinus asinorum in saecula saeculorum
Gabrielle Posted December 23, 2005 Posted December 23, 2005 The BAR. The prefered weapon of Bonnie and Clyde.
thepixiesrock Posted December 23, 2005 Posted December 23, 2005 Am I right fellas? I mean, am I right? Lou Gutman, P.I.- It's like I'm not even trying anymore!http://theatomicdanger.iforumer.com/index....theatomicdangerOne billion b-balls dribbling simultaneously throughout the galaxy. One trillion b-balls being slam dunked through a hoop throughout the galaxy. I can feel every single b-ball that has ever existed at my fingertips. I can feel their collective knowledge channeling through my viens. Every jumpshot, every rebound and three-pointer, every layup, dunk, and free throw. I am there.
Darth_Schmarth Posted December 23, 2005 Posted December 23, 2005 The BAR. The prefered weapon of Bonnie and Clyde. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Well they wound up as Swiss cheese anyhow. ^Asinus asinorum in saecula saeculorum
Gabrielle Posted December 23, 2005 Posted December 23, 2005 Well the same weapon was used against them as well.....
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now