Sarjahurmaaja. Posted May 9, 2005 Posted May 9, 2005 Are you guys saying you waited 'till you were 18 before you started, uh, "using" porn? 9/30 -- NEVER FORGET!
Kaftan Barlast Posted May 9, 2005 Author Posted May 9, 2005 It's not like let's say a 13 -17 year old could get scared for life...at least I wasn't "Ah, that's what you think, my boy, that's what you think" <{POST_SNAPBACK}> "You leave the boy alone, Sigmund. All he wants is a good old bit of decent smut like the rest of us" DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
FaramirK Posted May 10, 2005 Posted May 10, 2005 It's not like let's say a 13 -17 year old could get scared for life...at least I wasn't "Ah, that's what you think, my boy, that's what you think" <{POST_SNAPBACK}> "You leave the boy alone, Sigmund. All he wants is a good old bit of decent smut like the rest of us" <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
jaguars4ever Posted May 10, 2005 Posted May 10, 2005 It's not like let's say a 13 -17 year old could get scared for life...at least I wasn't "Ah, that's what you think, my boy, that's what you think" <{POST_SNAPBACK}> "You leave the boy alone, Sigmund. All he wants is a good old bit of decent smut like the rest of us" <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Gold.
metadigital Posted May 12, 2005 Posted May 12, 2005 I have to tip my tam-o-shanter to that Jung-Freud tete-a-tete, as well. OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
Kaftan Barlast Posted May 12, 2005 Author Posted May 12, 2005 Took one of the naughty pictures and added a splash of color for good measure. Perhaps I should have taken one with more indecent content but this will have to do. edit: Oh dear, just realised Vampirella has black boots.. there, fixed it. DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
Kaftan Barlast Posted May 12, 2005 Author Posted May 12, 2005 I did find one or two of Lady D but she hasnt got much colour so theres no point to it really, and its difficult to color uninked drawings. DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
213374U Posted May 12, 2005 Posted May 12, 2005 Damn good job. Are you a pro? - When he is best, he is a little worse than a man, and when he is worst, he is little better than a beast.
Roger the Sith Posted May 12, 2005 Posted May 12, 2005 More indecent? This one nearly put my eyes out with those... colours.
Kaftan Barlast Posted May 12, 2005 Author Posted May 12, 2005 Damn good job. Are you a pro? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> What do you mean? all I did was colour a pic I took of the website of naughty drawings. DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
213374U Posted May 12, 2005 Posted May 12, 2005 I know. But it's still a good work. Is that your job? - When he is best, he is a little worse than a man, and when he is worst, he is little better than a beast.
Kaftan Barlast Posted May 12, 2005 Author Posted May 12, 2005 No, Im a very commercially unsuccessful regular painter. And sweden doesnt have any big mainstream comic publishers so I guess Im stuck with that for now. DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
Roger the Sith Posted May 12, 2005 Posted May 12, 2005 Why not do illustrations and caricatures for books and newspapers then?
Kaftan Barlast Posted May 12, 2005 Author Posted May 12, 2005 Mostly its because I dont have the connections to hook me up with those kinds of jobs.. And a short tale of my unsuccessfulness: I had done this giant 3.5x1.2meter painting "pieta" style thing that I was selling for the ample price of 1000euro and got the local viccor to come take a look at it but upon sight of it he quickly excused himself that they had no room in the church and buggered off. To add injury to insult, when I moved away from there two months later, I had no way to take a painting that big with me so I had to leave it, and later I heard the secretary of the parish had taken it in. So in the end they got it for free... bastards. DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
metadigital Posted May 12, 2005 Posted May 12, 2005 [snip:http://www.xn--holmstrm-t4a.net/pics/vampirella.jpg ] Took one of the naughty pictures and added a splash of color for good measure. Perhaps I should have taken one with more indecent content but this will have to do. edit: Oh dear, just realised Vampirella has black boots.. there, fixed it. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Jeepers Kaftan, I can see what she had for breakfast! OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
Roger the Sith Posted May 13, 2005 Posted May 13, 2005 Isn't there a fraternal organization like a trade union you could join? And then sue the parish for theft.
metadigital Posted May 13, 2005 Posted May 13, 2005 Isn't there a fraternal organization like a trade union you could join? And then sue the parish for theft. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Just burn the church down -- they're sure to blame some muslim extremists. OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
Roger the Sith Posted May 13, 2005 Posted May 13, 2005 Seriously... They didn't have a contract that allowed the removal and ownership, did they? Also, they really trust union guys.
Darth Flatus Posted May 13, 2005 Posted May 13, 2005 dude you can't just post pr0n like that!!! that'll get this thread locked for sure!!
metadigital Posted May 13, 2005 Posted May 13, 2005 You are absolutely right, Baley. You have suffered no ill effects from your exposure to restricted material .... 2.Aren't you married? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Are you proposing to me? OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
Darth Flatus Posted May 13, 2005 Posted May 13, 2005 i think we are looking at he effect MD, not the cause Are you proposing to me as well? you wouldnt be the first, MD!!!!
metadigital Posted May 13, 2005 Posted May 13, 2005 i think we are looking at he effect MD, not the cause <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Well, Jung would say its all synchronous, all Baley events are joined by meaning ... and it is pretty obviously what that is ... OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
Darth Flatus Posted May 13, 2005 Posted May 13, 2005 I only propose to females ages 16-30 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Thats a whole lotta "NO"
metadigital Posted May 13, 2005 Posted May 13, 2005 I only propose to females ages 16-30 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I'd recommend getting to know them first, before launching into your *ahem* special interests. OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
Recommended Posts