14 hours ago, Gromnir said:

perhaps you would make that reasonable and nevertheless illogical assumption,

It's not illogical in the slightest. It's the result of your writing in pidgin, which is a choice you make. As it stands, I'll take it as that though because this is even more boring than the rest.

14 hours ago, Gromnir said:

irrelevant. again, you brought up blix.

That's in the context of you not providing sources and congratulating you for finding one that time. Highly relevant, given your conduct here.

And congratulations even if- or perhaps more so because- it showed what I was saying was correct.

14 hours ago, Gromnir said:

ok, see, now that is strawman. we made no such claim.

Really? You called looking for reza pahalvi ridiculous, on this very page, to whit:

On 2/3/2026 at 2:15 PM, Gromnir said:

we got 73 results, so close to your ridiculous targeted search product.

Oh dear.

14 hours ago, Gromnir said:

you just can't stop lying. is why am gonna continue to check your sources.

Well, someone can't it seems, though you do seem to be predominantly lying to yourself. Makes things easy for me, I just have to check your posts on the same page since you can't be consistent between them.

10 minutes ago, Zoraptor said:

It's not illogical in the slightest. It's the result of your writing in pidgin, which is a choice you make.

*chuckle*

you began with a grammar argument... remember your "plural" claim? regardless, as already noted, our "pidgen" could confuse you regarding subject agreement, but it wouldn't make the action plural. perhaps you realized arguing grammar were not gonna be helpful to your efforts? regardless, you then shifted away from grammar (devil) and then indulged a logic fallacy: argumentum ad populum (deep blue sea.)

On 2/3/2026 at 11:20 AM, Zoraptor said:

If you told anyone that you actually meant the sheep bleated once, they'd think you mental.

you should be embarrassed. the only thing that surprises us after multiple weeks o' this most recent zor nonsense is your capacity to repetitive self own but either 'cause o' stubbornness or a lack o' self awareness, you keep plugging away with new and improbably more infantile arguments.

18 minutes ago, Zoraptor said:

That's in the context of you not providing sources and congratulating you for finding one that time.

again, that is utter irrelevant given the context o' the share was your attempt to prove how Gromnir has accused you of bringing up blix constant. the thing is, the context o' your share is that it comes AFTER you brought up blix and did the comical "mythical hans Blix video," bit. talk about context, eh? beyond reason and good sense, you made blix relevant in a a discussion about gary johnson and his aleppo blunder. your claim that our "ps" is proof that Gromnir is accusing you o' constant bringing up blix appears positive divorced from reality... especial given context.

unfortunate, am having little faith you are gonna get this context thing.

30 minutes ago, Zoraptor said:

Really? You called looking for reza pahalvi ridiculous, on this very page, to whit:

oh, and go ahead and keep repeating to us that we said that "your" targeted search of pahlavi were ridiculous, 'cause am hopeful beyond hope that maybe you finally recognize your mistake. your targeted search is indeed ridiculous given the context (you were moved by context moments aggo. strange) o' your effort to prove relevance o' pahlavi or an effort by western media to embiggen.

15 hours ago, Gromnir said:

if you were trying to learn something about a specific person, pahlavi in this case, a search engine is a swell start. age? date of birth? what pahlavi said at a news conference? am having pointed out that if you wanna find info about even the most obscure and irrelevant subjects, search engines is wonderful tools: eg., quail egg recipes. am able to populate page upon page o' quail egg recipes. however, doing so don't prove anything about the relevance o' quail eggs in western cooking. a targeted search won't show us whether or not western culinary media is attempting to embiggen quail eggs. you were trying to use search engine population results to prove the relevance and o' pahlavi and the western media's effort's to embiggen him.

your lack of critical thinking skills is astounding.

'course is maybe just another grammar fail on your part. 'cause o' your reading comprehension difficulties and grammar misunderstands, you thought we were claiming that all targeted searches everywhere is flawed? would be a curious reading seeing as how we singled out your search specific and then observed who targeted searches can be useful when retrieving facts and data and such, but that for assigning relevance and a western effort to embiggen, your targeted search were positive impotent... and a lie. gonna count that actual number o' western stories in the list o' 73 we saved from the day in question? here is a hint: is considerable less than 54.

every zor source needs be checked. you misrepresent as with ps: hans blix, or you flat out lie. 'course the lying is not a shock as you are the low character guy who don't see anything the wrong with accusing journalists, politicians, cops and others o' moral turpitude before there is enough information to make such accusations reasonable... and your flaccid whataboutism does not in any way rehabilitate or excuse your lack o' character. is just who you are.

HA! Good Fun!

judge biery opinion and order (edit: the opinion length is ~500 words)

for those unaware o' the liam conejo ramos story.

HA! Good Fun!

Edited Wednesday at 10:31 PM1 day by Gromnir

Good grief. A see two posters who need their own rant thread.

(Seen on FARK.) Meanwhile, DJT is again wanting to turn the page on the whole Epstein affair. The problem is he's on that pages as well, and the next, and the next...

https://www.reuters.com/world/us-cuts-contact-with-polish-parliament-speaker-over-trump-insults-2026-02-05/

MAGA sure are thin skinned.

6 hours ago, rjshae said:

Good grief. A see two posters who need their own rant thread.

i'm just waiting for them to kiss

I think Gromnir's pretty safe from that at least.

On 2/5/2026 at 10:59 AM, Gromnir said:

you began with a grammar argument... remember your "plural" claim?

You deliberately write badly, then blame others for their 'misinterpretations'.

This happens very frequently and has happened at least three times in this thread. It's also happened to others. It's very much a you problem.

Again, I'm specifically not arguing with you, that's why everything is just repeated. Took long enough for you to notice, since I told you in the very first reply.

Bonus, takes me nearly no time at all. Probably 75% is mucking around with quotes and the disappearing cursor.

On 2/5/2026 at 10:59 AM, Gromnir said:

talk about context, eh?

OK, you brought up Blix, in the context of WMD, per the quote of yours that you keep on ignoring (this is a pattern). I just brought him up to show you didn't provide sources. Very relevant here, since you complained about me not providing them.

On 2/5/2026 at 10:59 AM, Gromnir said:

oh, and go ahead and keep repeating to us that we said that "your" targeted search of pahlavi were ridiculous,

OK, you kept repeating that searching for information about Reza Pahlavi when you wanted information on him was ridiculous while searching for iran protests was the thing to do. I even quoted you doing so the post previous.

On 2/5/2026 at 10:59 AM, Gromnir said:

whataboutism

Another literal lol. Pointing out that you do exactly what you accuse others of is not whataboutism, nor is it gaslighting or any other phrase those who cannot argue their way out of a paper bag use reflexively; it's just the truth. The first defence of anyone caught out in hypocrisy is to scream whataboutism (we're talking about what is wrong with you only! anything else is whataboutism!) and the only reason you're doing it here is because you don't have an actual refutation, because you cannot have an actual refutation. All those things you've accused me of you've done yourself.

I'm generally of the opinion that even people I don't like or don't value the opinion of are at least worth listening to, but this and you... I even feel bad laughing at this point.