Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

As has been shown again and again, Trump is very easy to manipulate and he always agrees with the last person he spoke to. Mamdani specifically seems like a particularly charming dude. 

 

Trump doesn't really care about NY. 

  • Thanks 1

"My hovercraft is full of eels!" - Hungarian tourist
I am Dan Quayle of the Romans.
I want to tattoo a map of the Netherlands on my nether lands.
Heja Sverige!!
Everyone should cuffawkle more.
The wrench is your friend. :bat:

Posted

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/doge-doesnt-exist-with-eight-months-left-its-charter-2025-11-23/

DOGE has officially closed 8 months early 

What a disaster,  it was hyped and sensationalized and now its over :grin:

Musk should have stayed in his lane in the private sector, his sojourn into public sector was an unmitigated failure 

"Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is and saw Virtue in her shape how lovely: and pined his loss”

John Milton 

"We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.” -  George Bernard Shaw

"What counts in life is not the mere fact that we have lived. It is what difference we have made to the lives of others that will determine the significance of the life we lead" - Nelson Mandela

 

 

Posted

It was just a means to sabotage Musks enemies, guess they were successful. 

"only when you no-life you can exist forever, because what does not live cannot die."

Posted
2 minutes ago, Lexx said:

It was just a means to sabotage Musks enemies, guess they were successful. 

No it had stated goals that were basically about reducing Federal expenditure that was considered wasteful and unnecessary 

And Musk was brought in because he claimed this would be " easy " 

Musk made a unexpected  mistake of assuming public sector restructuring  is the same as private sector restructuring which he had successfully done within his own companies

But DOGE had an understandable objective. There are lots of Americans who think the Federal government is bloated and ineffective 

They just went about it a completely heavy handed and unsustainable  way 

Im not sure why you think it was about Musk's enemies?

"Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is and saw Virtue in her shape how lovely: and pined his loss”

John Milton 

"We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.” -  George Bernard Shaw

"What counts in life is not the mere fact that we have lived. It is what difference we have made to the lives of others that will determine the significance of the life we lead" - Nelson Mandela

 

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, BruceVC said:

No it had stated goals that were basically about reducing Federal expenditure that was considered wasteful and unnecessary 

Yes, and then they dismantled the agencies that had dirt on Musk and were about to get him for it.

  • Like 1
  • Hmmm 1

"only when you no-life you can exist forever, because what does not live cannot die."

Posted

rotten carcass of usa federal goverment are dismembered much further in the last year

so oligarch got what they wanted

sadly what people wanted was rarely what they needed

even oligarch are people in this aspect

  • Gasp! 1
Posted

Hegseth showing his qualities with this spat with Kelly.  I wonder if he thinks an Army Captain is the same as a Navy Captain. 

Why has elegance found so little following? Elegance has the disadvantage that hard work is needed to achieve it and a good education to appreciate it. - Edsger Wybe Dijkstra

Posted (edited)

Double post.  

https://www.npr.org/2025/11/25/nx-s1-5615164/pentagon-scouting-hegseth-cut-ties

The US really isn't run by serious people.

Edited by Malcador
  • Confused 1

Why has elegance found so little following? Elegance has the disadvantage that hard work is needed to achieve it and a good education to appreciate it. - Edsger Wybe Dijkstra

Posted
18 hours ago, rjshae said:

Long term that makes no sense, at least for military recruitment. This administration is strangely obsessed by DEI. Idiots run in packs, I suppose.

 

it has obviously turn into circus now

make one wonder how the planned invasion of venezuela would go

Posted

it might actually be to late to flex with move against Venezuela. for one thing there are Russian navy in the area, for another they have failed to really sell it. Public opinion is largely negative. It won't boost his numbers. 

Na na  na na  na na  ...

greg358 from Darksouls 3 PVP is a CHEATER.

That is all.

 

Posted

just because something are stupid and unpopular doesn't mean usa wouldn't do it

like the tariff cutting all kind of social welfare and atrocity at middle east

  • Like 1
Posted

https://www.economist.com/interactive/trump-approval-tracker

Economist has just released its approval ratings for Trump and its not good, its because of the real and perceived failures around the economy and inflation. And as we all know these were the 2 main voting issues for most Americans who voted for Trump

I have also personally noticed a general anti-Trump sentiment on places like Codex which use to be mostly supportive of him in the dedicated thread. This forum is one of the few places where people still generally  respect Trump and will sometimes give him the benefit of doubt :grin:

My view on him hasnt really changed, he has had hits and misses but his misses are clearly undermining any good he has done. Of course it also doesnt matter what I think because Americans will decide his future and legacy when they vote. But he really needs to reverse things like tariffs which have negatively impacted the economy and inflation and the strict migration laws are also impacting domestic productivity in several states  

 

 

" Once the honeymoon is over, presidents tend to lose popularity quickly. But no recent president has fallen so low so quickly as Donald Trump. At the start of his second term public opinion was nearly evenly divided between those who approved of the president and those who did not. Things have since changed—his net approval is now lower than at any point in his first term. Rather than rebounding after the end of America’s longest ever government shutdown, Mr Trump’s popularity has continued to sink.

Americans are particularly dissatisfied with Mr Trump’s handling of inflation and the economy, two issues which were key to his re-election last November. Young and non-white voters, many of whom abandoned Democrats because of concerns about the cost of living, are now souring on Mr Trump faster than other groups. It was those voters who fuelled Democratic victories in governor elections in Virginia and New Jersey—an ominous sign for Republicans before next year’s midterm elections. "

 

 

"Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is and saw Virtue in her shape how lovely: and pined his loss”

John Milton 

"We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.” -  George Bernard Shaw

"What counts in life is not the mere fact that we have lived. It is what difference we have made to the lives of others that will determine the significance of the life we lead" - Nelson Mandela

 

 

Posted
4 hours ago, BruceVC said:

My view on him hasnt really changed, he has had hits and misses but his misses are clearly undermining any good he has done. Of course it also doesnt matter what I think because Americans will decide his future and legacy when they vote. But he really needs to reverse things like tariffs which have negatively impacted the economy and inflation and the strict migration laws are also impacting domestic productivity in several states  

The tariffs are a major gamble because it is all but impossible to determine what the long-term impacts will be. The economy is too complex to predict that accurately. But it's clearly not a robust approach to improving the economy; that comes from factors like better education and sound investments, not from trying to wreck every other nation's economy. A better approach would have been to be selective in tariff application, only applying them for nascent industries that need time to mature. But now that they are in place, they are much more difficult to remove because other nations have applied counter-tariffs. I fear that, in the future, the tariffs will prove to be a major handicap for American competitiveness.

Extracting illegal immigration from the economy is always going to be difficult, and is bound to have a negative impact on the economy. He would have been better served to focus on border security; letting current immigrants become assimilated and grow economically. Overall, his policies are inflationary and damaging to the economy. Any possible benefits of tariffs will take years to express themselves, and removing immigrants will continue to have a negative effect (except perhaps for government costs). In the meantime, the country is in for more pain over the next few years.

"It has just been discovered that research causes cancer in rats."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...