Namutree

Can we confirm that's why she was attacked?

The sad thing is we used to run to America to escape communism. Where do we run to now? America isn't becoming communist. It would become full on fascist before it would become communist.

Why are the women in his paintings either naked, unconscious, or both?

I'm not inclined to think that being an ethnocentric society is important. There have been plenty of ethnocentric societies that were failures. I've yet to hear of a classical liberal society that ever became a failed state. I will grant that the, "diversity is our strength" meme is stupid, but it's not a weakness either. It's merely a thing. What matters is values.

At this point I'm more than half way expecting it to actually be Hulk Hogan. Or for Trump to hold a reality TV special to find his VP. It's about the only thing this campaign has missed so far. I'd rather have Hulk Hogan than Hillary as president. At least he'd respect privacy rights.

I want to live forever. Also, I love Queen.

That excludes every woman on the planet. Then none of them are ideal. I didn't expect anything else.

I don't like surprises. If a relationship is packaged with surprises; count me out.

The government poisons people due to it's incompetence and negligence; so you now kinda want the government to have a complete monopoly over all resources? That seems like backward logic to me.Maybe he wants to go full Makhno and destroy the government while letting people use resources as they see fit? Would that even count as socialist? I usually think of socialism as public sector control of resources. Having resources completely free and available suggests no entity; not even the public sector is in control of it.

The government poisons people due to it's incompetence and negligence; so you now kinda want the government to have a complete monopoly over all resources? That seems like backward logic to me.

I'm about to take this more seriously than the OP likely intended... Okay, I'll divide my ideal partner into three categories: 1: Personality/behavior- I'd like a woman with a calm temperament. Some one stoic and rational at all times. I've dealt with more than enough drama and I don't want to deal with any more ever again. My ideal partner would never hesitate communicate anything important on her mind (in an appropriate setting), but would be articulate enough to be able to express herself in easily understandable terms. I'd like for her to be very intelligent and knowledgeable. As for her lifestyle I'd like a woman with the same interests and way of life as me. I don't like to rely on others, and I don't waste my life in pursuit of superfluous wealth. Obviously, I'd want her to be the same way. 2: Looks- There are many different looks women have that I find attractive. Ultimately it's hard for me to choose a favorite. I might post some images of women I find equally ideal in their own way later. I will say though that I do like dark skin, so while different body types can be equal in their own way. Black women have an innate advantage over all others for me (not that I don't find women of other ethnic backgrounds attractive). I should also note that I'm not too concerned about appearance so as long as they pass the personality test almost any woman would be acceptable. 3: Situation- Preferably my ideal partner would already be a home owner, as I'd prefer that we each still have our own living spaces for when we want some time apart. I'd like it if my spouse didn't have a family. I don't wanna meet her parents or extended family; so it would help if she didn't have any. I'd enjoy if she had a steady income with plenty of time off from her work. What she does; I don't care unless it could somehow become my problem.

This was taken from above: During the 2008 Democratic primary, she gathered her own young granddaughter to watch history unfold on TV, and cried when Hillary Clinton lost to Obama. Here's my question. Why would they be upset Hillary lost to Obama? Obama is just a slightly better version of Clinton.

After playing Star Fox Zero: A proper Star Fox game that doesn't ruin the experience with horrible gimmicks.

No Barti, you Americans don't need so many guns ....we have a much, much higher murder rate and not everyone in SA is armed Think there might be a connection?

Honestly, the party system doesn't matter as much as the people. This system would be cleaned up quickly and easily if people cared more.

I've always wanted the guillotine to be how I die. Just seems neat.

I would destroy Donald in a chess match. I've played it that game a lot, and Donald is too busy with more important matters to practice/study chess enough to compete with me.

A) He vastly expanded the drug war in what has to be the greatest injustice our government has committed against it's own people since Japanese internment (IMO it's arguable that the drug war is worse than Japanese internment). B) He pushed the policy that the US should pursue regime change in Iraq; making that war pretty much inevitable. How'd that turn out btw? C) The sanctions on Iraq he oversaw starved hundreds of thousands of completely innocent people to death (including children). D) Let's not forget the good old Defense of Marriage Act. I could go on, but this post would be a mile long.

Bernie would have decimated Trump. Yes, but it looks like Bernie is going to lose the primary barring a miracle. Hillary will maybe win, but I can see her losing to Trump if a lot of Bernie supporters don't vote for her which isn't an unlikely scenario. Hopefully though there's some convention **** that results in Kasich or Rubio or Ryan grabbing the nomination that drives Trump supporters out and fatally wounds both parties. So, if it's gonna be Trump vs. Hillary, who are you gonna vote for; if you'd be voting for either. If you won't vote for either let's imagine you'd have absolutely no choice and by not choosing either Hillary auto gets your vote; who would you vote for then? Personally, I'll be going Trump. I don't like really Trump, but IMO he's 1000x times better than Hillary.

Bernie would have decimated Trump. it wouldn't have been a decimation. We'll have to agree to disagree then.

Bernie would have decimated Trump.

You don't. Only corporeal things can have legitimate value. That's a ridiculous and untrue statement, even if applied in purely a monetary sense, which is seemingly the way you mean it. That is how I meant it. Yeah, and those attempts are stupid. I pity you. k

You don't. Only corporeal things can have legitimate value. That's a ridiculous and untrue statement, even if applied in purely a monetary sense, which is seemingly the way you mean it. That is how I meant it. Yeah, and those attempts are stupid.

You don't. Only corporeal things can have legitimate value.

The medical expenses should not count as damages since the offending party is not responsible for the owner's reaction to the dog's injury. If the owner wants to spend $1,000's to try to save the dog that is exclusively the owner's responsibility. The only thing that the offending party is responsible for is a dog. The offender owes you a dog of equal monetary value. (Your time too if you have to get the new one yourself). I'm not sure if putting the dog down is legally mandatory; if it is, then he owes you for that too since he put you in a situation where you were *FORCED* to pay for at least that medical procedure. If you have a choice to tell the vet you don't want to save the dog, then he owes you squat for what you decide to spend your money on. By your logic; if I stepped on some guy's tin can, and he spent $1,000,000,000 trying to fix it I'd have to pay for it all. It's not my fault this guy really loves THIS tin can. I owe him a tin can; not whatever money he wastes trying to fix it. Maybe there is no other tin can he's so attached to, maybe losing this can will leave a hole in his heart for life; I dunno. His feelings are his responsibility as are the money he spends because of it.