Jump to content

GarethCarrots

Members
  • Posts

    755
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by GarethCarrots

  1. gah extremist, troublecausers no matter what!
  2. bah im not even gunna buy tsl i dont think, il probly wait till my bday my enthusiasm has completely waned, in fact id be more excited about a decent lotr rpg!!
  3. do you really think two development houses will work together on this....
  4. well actually if you had goodness tattoed onto your retina it wud be all you saw through one eye, so you could compare all you saw through your normal eye to establish what was goodness or not
  5. i find it amusing how excited people are getting about this, i mean what are you guys amateur conspiracy theorists :D
  6. tell me how to and i will use quotes, since i am forgiving your ignorance perhpas you will excuse mine. do hurry i have many significant points to make ps if no1 tells me i will presume its cos they are to scared because they know that i will own them eventually
  7. so you agree that in general an rpg will have a better story? you see as soon as you are confronted with qa question asking why you deny rpgs having better storys than fps you resort to a specific example, can you not see we are taling generally, even you must be intelligent enough for that, although your line of argument and technique in delivering it is shoddy
  8. answer my question please, if you dont im just gunna presume you cant, which fyi i do neway you obviously disagree with me when a say an rpg will always have a more in depth story so i want to know why you disagree
  9. let me turn this on its head, why would you say an rpg doesnt have a more in depth story... sheer stuborness, boredom, enlighten me.
  10. gah i dont understand why people are even trying to deny that rpgs have more in depth storys than fps, its pure stupidity. let me turn this on its head, why would you say an rpg doesnt have a more in depth story...
  11. please developer dude, if you are actually reading this, answer this question for me. as a developer of rpgs (i presume) would you not agree that they are more story based than fps, and therefore have more in depth storys than fps
  12. a genre is just a commercial label eh, i defy you to present that argument to anyone with any degree of intelligence successfully, in fact that is the single most ridiculous thing ive ever heard said. you have just tried to define a word, rewrite its its meaning in the dictionary. supreme arrogance not just stupidity: gen
  13. "No. True RPGs are about choice and guess what: role playing, not story. Not anymore than FPSs, anyway. The story is just the setting in which the game takes place, and is not defined by the game mechanics or the POV. If so far most FPS games have a simple story is just because their devs didn't put enough emphasis on that aspect of the game. Not because FPSs can't have a deep, complex plot." yes rpgs are defined by choice and role playing, but in depth choice and in depth role playing, you make the character your own, this development is what makes it into a story. your comment on storys just being the setting for a game is complete ignorance, in all rpgs the game revolves around the story and if you try to deny that i first want a direct quote from someone who makes rpgs. story is not defined by game mechanics but game genre, mechanics are extremely subtle on the level i am talking about, over specifiying is not a good way make a point in my opinion. im not denying that fps can have an in depth storyline, but they dont, and an rpgs storyline will always be more in depth. in an rpg the combat revolves round the story in an fps the story revolves round the combat
  14. im not actually involved in this argument but i cant resist a good debate: fps=action orientated rpg=story orientated i believe that those two phrases say it all also you claim the other dude is immature because he wont stand down, even though your arguments are flawless, well from where im standing its the other way round, all opinions are subjective so do not try and make what you are saying into irrevocable fact
  15. hmm firstly of course fps are more simple than rpgs, anyone who argues otherwise is a fool secondly no. if bioware were forced to work to the same schedule obsidian were the game would have been of similar quailty.
  16. it got wiped out throught infighting and a final battle with the jedi, tis all on the database dude
  17. why blinker yourself with a set of parameters. its a new game, just accept that your uber strong character is now weak for the purpose of the new game, it shouldnt need some sort of reason. once again i say the mass defines and the minority denies *accusing obsidian of heavy handed stupidity is sheer well its not even ignorance its blatant and arrogant stupidity.
  18. god just grasp the fact that you start a game weak, thats just how it is. if you let that silly little fact annoy you then its your fault your not enjoying the game. the mass defines and the minority denies, tis just how it works
  19. no offence dude but you spout some of the most unholy bs. post script unless your 12 and under your spelling of 'their' is unnaceptable oh yeah, what makes you think theyr related, out of interest
  20. *bullcrap* inventive. i think its sad you let that fact bother you dude, new game you obviously gunna start from the beginning. as for the story etc, these guys are pros by definition. i trust them
  21. this post is highly amusing regardless of what merits the original subject did or did not have, thank you all for improving my evening
  22. indeed, that is why i posted what i did, it is basically an apology for my rudeness and it also stated my intentions minus the rudeness..... perhaps i did not make it clear enough
  23. i agree we were trollish, however i think people have evryright to disagree with the original posters opinion whatever forum we are on. im sure kotor is a great game, all i am saying is perhaps it was slightly to 'vigorously' praised peace dudes, no offence meant
×
×
  • Create New...