Everything posted by Hurlshort
-
Pictures of your games
It looks great, I am pretty excited for it to make it stateside. Hopefully we will see it in January.
-
Games you are looking forward to.
I think I'll get Gran Turismo 5 when it comes out. It should be fairly epic, they've been working on it forever.
-
Large Hadron Collider successfully creates mini Big Bangs
I've been trying to watch all 10 seasons of Stargate lately, so I feel I should be ready to contribute to this discussion soon.
-
What you did today
Isn't your solution to heartbreak to eat copious amounts of sausage? I didn't mean to make that sound dirty, but I really have no idea how to frame that question differently.
-
What you did today
I'd ask you to explain that to my hormonal wife, Krezack, but I'm not sure you would survive long enough to get it all out.
-
Yahtzee reviews
Seen it? I consider it the leading source for Star Wars canon!
-
What you did today
My condolences. It's not much, but at least it sounds like she didn't suffer long.
-
Large Hadron Collider successfully creates mini Big Bangs
I'm always pleasantly surprised by Iwanttehkotor3's posts. I mean I see his name, and I read his angry signature, and I prepare for the worst. And then he turns out to be a thoughtful and intelligent young man. Good stuff!
-
Yahtzee reviews
You know what, I think Wookies are lame and Ewoks are adorable.
-
FO: NV (General Discussion)
I bought DLC for ME2, and that was my first. It was actually pretty good stuff, basically an inexpensive expansion. It helped that the game allowed you to keep playing after you finished the main storyline, I was already going planet to planet finishing up side quests so the DLC was a very natural fit.
-
BioWare's New Game
Anyone else get a Blackhawk Down vibe here?
-
Large Hadron Collider successfully creates mini Big Bangs
As I've said, I am referring to your entire history as a poster here, not just this thread. The problem I see is you are always confident of your claims correctness, to the point of dismissing other evidence from posters as irrelevant or incorrect. You position yourself as an expert on quite a few different topics, and that in itself causes many of us to be skeptical towards you. That is why I mentioned Zoraptor's post, he presented his claim with evidence, and then he was humble enough to point out that a physicist may have a better claim on the subject. He came across as knowledgeable but not arrogant. I think you are a very reasonable guy WoD, you've posted some great links over the years that have been informative for me and even changed my own stances on occasion (a certain writer on Islamic studies comes to mind.) That is why I find it frustrating when you get into these debates and are unwilling to weigh other evidence. As for the topic at hand, I'm currently not anywhere near educated enough on the subject. I'm not even entirely sure what your side is, is it that the LHC may cause a black hole that will eventually consume our planet?
-
Large Hadron Collider successfully creates mini Big Bangs
What argument? I was making a judgement of you personally.
-
Large Hadron Collider successfully creates mini Big Bangs
Hang on there, Krezack offered up an olive branch. It was very big of him to apologize, and offering to patiently try and explain complex concepts should be met with appreciation. I know I have very little knowledge of black holes or the LHC despite my fancy college degree. WoD, unless this is actually your field, it would really do you some good to be a bit more humble. Zoraptor is the only one here who has really established his credentials and presented actual numbers and evidence. Not that I understood any of it, but you are simply posturing. Although I've seen WoD post in enough debates to know that he is the sort of guy who choses a side and sticks with it, no matter how much evidence is presented. Sure, it would be nice to see him take an open-minded approach and weigh the evidence before fully committing, but that would be a major break from his pattern.
-
FO: NV (General Discussion)
You are missing out, AP was fantastic. I would put it right next to FO:NV as my game of the year, albeit a very different type of game.
-
FO: NV (General Discussion)
Wowsers! I wonder what this will mean for Obsidian? I don't remember KotOR2 or NWN2 being this big of a success out the gate. This seems like their first genuine blockbuster.
-
Large Hadron Collider successfully creates mini Big Bangs
I think you folks take WoD a bit too seriously.
-
NHL
It was nice to watch the Sharks take the Kings down a notch last night. I'm not terribly into the season yet, I'm still a bit pooped from the exciting Giants run in Baseball and our Basketball team the Warriors are a more engaging early season story. I'm sure I'll get into it when we get closer to the halfway mark. The problem is there is nothing exciting about my Sharks right now. They are a very talented team and they are going to win a lot of games, but it is rather ho hum. I need a surprise performance or something to get me watching every minute like I usually am.
-
FO: NV (Spoilers)
I got lost there as well.
-
Large Hadron Collider successfully creates mini Big Bangs
But was that cow genetically designed by scientists?
-
Large Hadron Collider successfully creates mini Big Bangs
You know, if you concern yourself with every little world ending scenario, you just aren't living. Let go and embrace the black hole.
-
What are your favorite games?
We should make a "games I go back to every few years or wish I could" List. On it I would have: 1. Xcom 2. JA2 3. Baldur's Gate 4. Fallout 5. Oregon Trail
-
FO: NV (General Discussion)
I got lost in the Hoover Dam for almost an hour at one point, it was frustrating. Still, I felt the locales had a ton more personality than FO3. There weren't any towns with two people, at least.
-
Psychonauts 2
It actually made me a bit nauseous, due to the camera movement. But the style was cool.
-
Best and Worst Game Endings
Quest for Glory 1 and 4 had great endings. QFG3 had one of the worst though.