Valsuelm

I must say... that's a hell of an interesting interpretation of or was it another video I linked?

Thoughts? My thought is the emperor took his clothes off and is mockingly flashing the world, laughing as most don't even know he's the emperor. "The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist" It's increasingly looking like there may come a point that the devil can openly dance over the masses and they don't even realize who's dancing on them. When he doesn't even need to pretend anymore, the darkness that will fall will last centuries if not longer.

the Ukraine girls really knock me out, they leave the west behind And Moscow girls make sing and shout That Georgia’s always on my my my my my my mind wait, are the girls wearing sexualised pioneers uniforms? Seems regular to me...

He was probably good for a couple rounds of flip cup.

Dramatic swings in rhetoric perhaps. No too much swing otherwise.

It makes no logical sense because constitutionally it's very arguable that Mueller has no business investigating the President at all. Constitutionally it's very arguable that the job Mueller even has shouldn't even exist. Those who founded this country didn't give us a FBI or anything like it. The idea of a Federal police force did not fly at all with the 'founders' or just about anyone else who ran the nation for it's first ~100 years, and with very good reason. The FBI is an epitome of Federal power gone awry. The organization has been corrupt as **** since day one, founded by J.P Morgan's lapdog Teddy R. as a political witch hunting machine. ~120 years later it's making headlines doing the very thing that it started out doing. The entire FBI investigation is a circus and a charade. Threatening to fire the people perpetrating it is not obstruction of justice, nor is actually firing them. Too many people have been brainwashed to think the FBI has any authority at all over the President. It doesn't. The FBI answers to him. The only people the President constitutionally has to answer to are the voters, or the Senate/SCOTUS in the event that Congress (who is supposed to act on behalf of the voters - but just about never does) votes to impeach him.

A pattern of behavior? What pattern of behavior that Trump has engaged in constitutes obstruction of justice?

Showing them the questions he wants to ask doesn't seem like a good idea because then they'll try to coach Trump on the answers. Then again, they don't know what he does know, or doesn't know for that matter. They probably have a good idea, sure, but still. IIRC, his lawyer previously implied that Trump would not submit to being deposed (...in the sense of coming in to answer questions - I still have hope that the other sense of the word is possible, ), so I think it's a sort of negotiation tactic to let him prepare his answers. The fact that he and his lawyer had a meltdown after seeing them probably suggests that their level of preparedness won't help him avoid incriminating himself in some manner - given the vast amounts of obstruction of justice that he's posted on Twitter for all to see (and now witness tampering), it wouldn't exactly be a surprise. I would assume the questions gave them an idea of where Mueller plans to go with the probe, whether it's collusion or simply the obstruction of justice-related charges. Please provide some tweeted evidence of obstruction of justice. I'm curious. In related news: Drudge is running a poll on whether Trump should fire Mueller or not. As of this post, more than 75% of those voting say Mueller should be fired. And a Republican congressman predicts (correctly I think) that when the Democrats gain the house (they are very likely to) they will vote to impeach the Trump.

Kim and his people are so misunderstood by the west. All they really want to do is get down and boogie...

She is without a doubt the most obviously selfish and reprehensible individual in American politics. Today for sure, and very arguably ever. I agree wholeheartedly that Johnson should have been in the debates, but he was never a true alternative. Had he been in the debates, that would be more obvious. He didn't lose because too many Americans think there are only two choices. He never got anywhere because he's a pretty ****ty candidate, with a mostly crappy message. He was pretty much a status quo guy for many of the issues that people want changed, no matter what direction they happen to lean in politically. The fact is that guy had as much legitimate claim to his party's nomination as Hillary did to her's, as the Libertarian party nomination was about as crooked as the democratic party's nomination process the last go around. The cry of foul within the Libertarian party during primary time was not small (though it barely made any news). The truth is that Libertarian party is as hijacked, bought and paid for as the Republican and Democrat apparatuses. I look forward to the day you realize that. And all that said, the solutions to the nation's biggest problems will more than likely never be found via the 'right person' in the White House. It's long past that point, unfortunately.

Just discovered these guys.... Going to see about catching their upcoming Burlington show.

I am serious poster. Funny post you have. Inoculation? I have said nothing about vaccine or such things. What is this offtopic ramblings:). Do the sun exist really? Do the Moon exist really? Teasing you I take this as friendly comment and have nothing against you. You don't have to say X, talk about X, or even elude to X, in order for some people to genuinely believe you to have done so, or for others to think you hate X. Also, note that some folks on this forum find it near impossible to make a serious post themselves. And finally, the moon doesn't actually exist.

There are fewer celebrated scientific minds out there because most science was long ago largely hijacked by political and corporate agendas. Objectivity does not reign supreme anywhere in modern academia, including in the various fields of science. It hasn't for decades, and it's influence continues to wane. Hawking wasn't near as much a scientist as he was the high priest of the Big Bang religion.

My grandpa thought Alex Jones might have something worth while to say just because Megan Kelly setup an entirely unfair interview format against him, so it's not like people don't get dupped into his shtick. I actually really like Jordan B Peterson. I started following his academic stuff even before the whole Bill C-16 which smuggled in compelled speech laws. I'm actually a fan of Sam Harris as well, and I know those two and their respective communities don't seem to get along all that well. I think he's buckling a bit under the immense media pressure, doesn't always express himself the best than he can, and a huge swath of the left can't help but misinterpret him. I think he's trying to formulate his insights in a way that lay people can digest it, and it's far from as good as his academic lectures. If you dig back and look at a lot of his material you start to see a really profound picture unfolding. It actually takes some effort though to understand it all, and it's very routed in academic neuropsychology. I do agree with Harris that a lot of what Peterson talks about could be reformatted in a secularly humanistic manner, but I do think Peterson is very right about a lot of what he speaks about. I don't think Harris appreciates the fact that certain morals are hard to formalize unless experienced in a highly figurative sense. Peterson is far more the pragmatist. I'd be happy to go on but maybe in another thread. I believe in this what they tell about banking and so does the vast majority of my friends do most of them: Nevermind the other conspiracy theories 9/11 etc. Bear with me. I said I believe everything they said about banking cartels and that video is from Alex Jones channel. Of all possible conspiray theories out there I really believe in the conspiracy theory of banking cartell see it. Primary source material is generally always best. The documentary you link is at least third tier, it lifts material from many others, some second tier (ie: Zeitgeist). Watch the originals. For documentaries on modern banking, see the following: The Money Masters: (some of the information in this video is slightly dated or incorrect (the maker, Bill Still later corrects himself in other videos), however the vast majority of it still applies and is correct. And while he has newer videos, this is still the best single documentary on the history of modern banking that I've seen. If you were lucky enough to have had a good history teacher or two somewhere along the way, much of the contents of this video will be familiar to you.) Money as Debt: The Banker's Cabal: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8eVLVf9dSW8 I highly recommend watching all of these, and in the order I list them. As the latter two build on the ones that come before. There are other good documentaries on the subject, but having watched many, these are the best three to start with. If you're interested in others, or documentaries on other subjects, PM me. I have a long list of recommendations. Understanding this world, and how it really functions, vs. how it's advertised to function, begins with understanding the world banking system.

Too late, the pollution is thick!!! and unfortunately oozing out!!!

#1 on the charts 30 years ago today...

I agree on the humor, the timing was off though, for reasons that if stated I think might open the same can of worms that I thought to avoid when I delete the original post. While I'm not overly familiar with British laws (as there are oh so many in that supposed land of free that still sees many willingly bow down to a parasitic monarch), they certainly pretend to be a nation that holds 'free speech' in the highest regard. Pretend it as many a Brit might, reality speaks to a truth much different. While this event is sadly not surprising given western civilization's hell bent trajectory towards really ugly **** if not all out doom, it is disconcerting to see ever more steps taken towards the abyss. I'm not sure I've ever said this before on this forum, but I've been thinking it for a few years now: The rate of decline is astounding, as is the rise in ignorance in western culture. While the decline has been predictable as the seeds were sown a few generations ago, the increasing acceleration is somewhat astounding. The authorization drift is nearly everywhere in western civilization, and the authoritarian drifts (if you will) are getting so high it's beginning to get hard to see the yonder field of relative freedom that we used to all be standing in from where we're now standing. As you are indeed very correct, though I'd say it wasn't even a generation ago....

You would have fit in really well in Pol Pot's regime.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTt7QzIu2XU