PK htiw klaw eriF

The fact that he is writing about the company his girlfriend works at without disclosing it is pretty shady. Should be a red flag for coi to any editor worth their salt.

The Codex is moderated, juuust not in the style that you're used to. I like it how it is. If it was moderately or overmoderated I wouldn't visit there very often. Fair enough, if you don't mind me asking I'm interested in what type of moderation style is used on the Codex ? http://www.rpgcodex.net/forums/index.php?threads/rules-of-the-codex-enhanced-edition-directors-cut-2013.87048/

You are. The codex is the codex, if you think it's bad don't go there. RPGWatch provides an alternative that caters to your sensibilities.

There you go anon. https://archive.today/FmyoE https://archive.today/SKUgW https://archive.today/hVgld https://archive.today/2fzHI

You'd be half wrong on the Jew part Bruce. I consider them mild because it's essentially teenagers doing a tough guy routine doing the internet. Getting offended over that sort of behavior is silly.

I appreciate your honesty but yes you obviously "can't see the wood for the trees " if you think the some of the comments on the Codex are normal and acceptable I didn't say they were acceptable or normal Bruce. Please refrain from putting words in my mouth.

Perhaps it's cuz I lurk on the chans, but the codex seems rather mild to me. *shrug*

Funny thing about that guy... He is in a long-term relationship with a Ubisoft employee and wrote several articles extolling Ubisoft.

****.

Stealing this idea.

You Sir! are a scallywag and no do gooder and I challenge you to a duel! Pistols at dawn leader.

Arcanum is ****. They managed to make a game more unbalanced than 2e with content that is more boring than a Bendis comic.

I suggest killing all emotion with booze.

Wow, didn't realize what an insensitive cis you are. Check your privilege.

**** consoles. PCMasterRace 4evah.

It's BioWare.

Can we kill this thread with fire?

Good Science....

As a treekin, I find that very offensive.

Why is negativity such a bad thing in a forum, anyway ? It has a human cost.

The codex is pretty much /v/ light with namefags. I'll stick to /v/.

I hope hard isn't as unbalanced in the final release as it currently is in 392.

Baphomet and Gamergate boards are both hosted by 8chan, so anything Baphomet does is the fault of the misogynist known as Gamergate. Of course believing this means you have to disregard 1)Baphomet saying they aren't gamergate and 2)The notion of personal responsibility/accountability. They've already discarded 2, and despite baph doxing a sea lion and his wife, I'm sure they will disregard 1. By this logic, any subreddit must take responsibility for any other subreddit, but they've rarely been consistent with logic.

I am still surprised at the level of stupidity here. Almost every western country has this mandated by law: the accused should meet its accusers. Jesus. It's like they don't bother to read the TOS.

Unless I can put a stick on a baby and make a mace out of it on the sequel I don't buy the whole these are bad people bit. Demonicon made a better job of presenting and allowing for evil options than Blackguards and was a good game to play with maces. If it didn't have incestuous romance If it didn't take place in Dark Eye setting I'd rate it lower than Bound by Flame. The latter was a better game on its own. Really? Bound by Flame was a bit of a fizzle for me, it just failed to deliver in the end and the level design was far more linear than Of Orcs and Men and Mars War Logs both games which I enjoyed more. Whereas Demonomicon felt solid enough to give it a pass. On topic, I'm surprised the Codex didn't go crazy over the turn based combat in D:OS. Me thinks that they have gone into the Games Journalism business and become corrupt, I distinctively recall seeing a special thanks to the Codex on that game. Guess that's all it takes to be Codex No. 1 Huh? Most Codexians(that I've seen here) cream their pants at the very mention of turn-based, I would've been surprised f D:OS didn't get #1.