Jump to content

working man hole

Members
  • Content Count

    29
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

9 Neutral

About working man hole

  • Rank
    (1) Prestidigitator
  1. Also the fact Obsidian has a tendency to make really bad camera controls - the worst aspect of NWN2 was the horrible camera. I don't mind first person camera for a single PC, but when controling a party of characters, fixed iso is the way to go. Since this is not a "find a hidden object" game, rotating camera would add nothing worthwhile, but, judging by previous experiences, only frustration. Zoom will probably be in and useful too, to accomodate for different resolutions etc.
  2. I don't get these threads that ask for PE being made like every other generic quasi-rpg fps being produced today. This is for those of us who actually want a game made "the classic way", and those who don't believe that way is obsolete or in any way worse than the "modern" way. I for one believe it's superior in almost every way, from enabling tactical combat, to, contrary to your opinion, better immersion. It is much harder to immerse when I have to constantly watch those uncanny valley faces talking rubbish with voices given by incompetent voice actors. We waited 10 years for something like this, why do you want to take it away?
  3. I would certainly like immunities and resistances implemented, no dumbing down please. Of course, there should be an ingame bestiary available, so you can get needed information. Even better if it's tied to skills, like ranger knowing weaknesses of wildlife or mages knowing weaknesses of constructs etc.
  4. 1) A slight possibility of failure(or success) in combat should exist 3) Absolutely, it was one of critical things missing in IE games 4)? 5) YES! 6) agree with evdk. No nwn style please 7) no none necessary 9) skills like arcanum, not many levels 10) If there is still enough (>20) skills left, why not 12) what like parrots, pokemons or druid/ranger companions - I don't care for either 13)yes 14) If possible, yes
  5. Pairs of the opposite sex, not necessarily heterosexuals. Yes, they breed gays too. My point is that being able to breed isn't an indication of any kind of superiority. Biologically, it definitely is. Judging by your contempt, you must be the legendary child of Mark and Steve, whose parents were Roderick, John, Frank and Joseph?
  6. Yeah, hetero pairs holding hands and kissing in public keep their sexuality preferences in private... or when they mention their husbands/wives/boyfriends/girlfriends.. that hot guy/girl that passed by.. they keep it private? Not. There's a hetero parade every single minute 365 days in a year, imbecile. Except heterosexuality has a biological purpose, and is kind of necessary for continuation of species. Don't try to imply that queersexuality has equal worth as heterosexuality. Crudely put but accurate. At the end of the day it doesn't matter what you are it is absolutely certain you are the result of a heterosexual pairing. Also incorrect. Homosexuality has a biological purpose in that a homosexual couple doesn't bring a new child into the world, but can take care of abandoned children. It's seen in the animal world, and it's seen in our society as well through adoption. Because heterosexual people can't adopt?
  7. Idiot (sorry mods, but this is the appropriate word), stop mixing homosexuality with pedophilia and zoophilia. They're only comparable in your sick little brain. This guy is spewing hate speech all over the place. I wonder why is he still kept here. Why would you insult him like that? All of those mentioned above belong into the same group of mental disorders. It is true that one is harmful to other people and the other is not - that's why pedophilia is prosecuted while LGBT is not, or at least shouldn't be. Oh the humanity if you're not actually a clone of that idiot and defending yourself.. In case you're not, there are 2 idiots too many on this forums and I'm just using proper terms. Homosexuality is not a mental disorder and you should stop flaunting your ignorance. The sad part is.. even an idiot could learn that in the era of google. Therefore, a big sorry to all idiots out there! Don't you say... Transgender people - not a disorder, because he/she/it is actually a woman, just born in a man's body (or vice versa). Body dismorphic disorder - a disorder when the affected person is concerned with body image, manifested as excessive concern about and preoccupation with a perceived defect of their physical features. Why is one time the brain wrong, but in another, very similar case it's the body? As for homosexuality, did you choose to be aroused by same sex, or is it inborn? Becuse if it's inborn, it is certainly an error, possibly one of the worst errors a brain can have. Since the primary purpose of all life is reproduction...
  8. Yeah, hetero pairs holding hands and kissing in public keep their sexuality preferences in private... or when they mention their husbands/wives/boyfriends/girlfriends.. that hot guy/girl that passed by.. they keep it private? Not. There's a hetero parade every single minute 365 days in a year, imbecile. Except heterosexuality has a biological purpose, and is kind of necessary for continuation of species. Don't try to imply that queersexuality has equal biological worth as heterosexuality.
  9. Idiot (sorry mods, but this is the appropriate word), stop mixing homosexuality with pedophilia and zoophilia. They're only comparable in your sick little brain. This guy is spewing hate speech all over the place. I wonder why is he still kept here. Why would you insult him like that? All of those mentioned above belong into the same group of mental disorders. It is true that one is harmful to other people and the other is not - that's why pedophilia is prosecuted while LGBT is not, or at least shouldn't be.
  10. I don't really understand how a transgender person with difficulty connecting to a nontransgendered character would find it easier to connect to an asexual race, much less a race that has no sexuality because it's a non-organic construct like a golem. And I don't understand how people fail to grasp role playing games are games where you're supposed to play(with implemented mechanics) other characters, not yourself. When asking for these gay/trans/furry/foot fetish/whatever people want to play themselves - you're a tranny irl, why don't you play a lawful neutral/dwarf/cleric-thief. If you want to play yourself having romances, changing clothes and arranging your house according to feng-shui, all the while making your avatar as close as possible to yourself, what the **** are you doing here? For such needs there is the Sims series. Sh**t, I've been doing it wrong? I always play as a male character finding it easyer to relate, and I've been having so much fun with my games! I do tend to mix it up a bit when it comes to the morality issues, but I never seem to be able to get the feel for female PCs the same way I do male PCs. Fu*k. Now I don't know what to do. Go play Sims/Second Life/Elder Scrolls Thanks, but no thanks - I think I'll stick to what I like. Then why would you try to turn that what you already like into something completely different
  11. Well, you know how immature priviledged white straight males are, don't you? I may be confusing my long term posters here, but as I recall Jaesun, the "Burn it with Fire" suggester, isn't that. But how could it be that a gay male would not be supportive of the cause? Unpossible!
×
×
  • Create New...