kumquatq3

That's silly, only I can do that

There was something on the Lost website between season 1 and 2 with a plane seating chart. If you clicked around, the flight number would change. There is some kind of "2nd plane" thing going on. I think the idea that the island could be "purgatory" or something is clearly just there to mislead at this point.

In Locke We Trust Jacob was cool, but it was predictable. Hopefully the last 10 minutes gives us something cool.

You mean "accept" it. No I didn't. I'm just a little crazy like that.

Starcraft didn't have heroes. Yes it did, not in MP tho. And not with RPG elements. O, BTW, Starcraft is the best all around RTS EVER. No discussion. No debate. Just except it.

Shhhhh, you'll blow my cover

So, did the girl die after saying "Desmond" or did she black out....or do I have to wait to next week? Entertaining episode. Desmond tends to do that.

Are you kidding? I'm surprised the forums are still up!

http://thelastboss.com/post.phtml?pk=2652 http://www.dailytech.com/STEAM+Hacked+User...article6972.htm http://emp.damage-web.net/viewtopic.php?p=62590

Not really interested, I would think I should be, but I'm not

50!

I blame the upcoming movie "Hot Fuzz". Damn you British and your gun culture!!!

They apparently did, he turned it down at "the price EA was offering". So says the Dan Patrick show,

Vince Young gets the Madden cover. I predict he blows out both knees.

You could make an argument, but it would be badly reaching imo

We were talking about the franchise, not past games individually. I tried to make the distinction, maybe I failed to make it clear. I hope it makes sense in hindsight. The argument made the assumption that the FO3 was a "bad FO". Since that assumption was made, "I rather have no FO than a bad FO" works. Also, it doesn't matter if you look at it from a "who gets to decide" viewpoint. The argument is one of personal opinion. Whatever your opinion is, you rather have no FO than what you precieve to be a bad FO.

Hey, just like Beth has the right legally to make the game into whatever they want, fans of the series can respond however they want.

I think it is too.

Just watched that too, good flick, felt the doctors performance was underrated. However, while I assumed his character was mostly fictional, it's disappointing to find out it's pretty much all made up. Also saw Blades of Glory, better than I thought it would be. Worth a watch.

Yep. Clearly our little Mormon girl didn't understand how to franchise herself properly. There is no real argument here. There is little reason not to agree with the line "I rather have no FO then a bad one" if you're a FO fan and you want to see a FO4-5-6 after a FO3. Or hell, if your a fan of PC RPGs period. I mean, who really wants a bad RPG? I think people are just having problems coming to terms with Doomy (Sand for you with short memories) being right.

You're a good guy, I like you. I'll have Devin Hester cap it at 5 returns for TD's

Clearly you don't know Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery I'm sure he, smartly for him, pays alot of taxes via the corporation. I mean, death and taxes, right?

So people would rather have a game that sucks and carries the name "Fallout" to try and sell a few extra copies than no Fallout? So you guys are all for games like FO:BOS? The question isn't asking if I think Beth or Iply has the right to make such games, just what I would prefer. I think the only rational answer for a FO fan is to say I rather have no FO than a bad FO.

The name sounds familiar. Where's Darque when you need her?