bradleypariah

I think DS3 was revolutionary and too many people were too daft to notice it. What's on the top of everyone's list right now? Diablo 3 on consoles. The original Diablo was was-driven, and had no camera control at all. You just click, click, click and It was amazing, yes? Dungeon Siege combat used to be mouse-driven, but had a bit more tactics to it. Dungeon Siege 3 comes out HOW LONG AGO? - and what is it? It's exactly like Diablo 3 on the consoles, but you have camera control, you get to interact with the story, role-play, and choose your dialog. Everyone's $#!tting their pants over Diablo 3 right now... so WHAT was wrong with DS3, exactly? Nothing, other than it isn't exactly like 1 or 2. I hope Obsidian does make a DS4, and I honestly hope they don't take the advice of all the haters on here. I own all three Dungeon Siege games, and you know what? The only one I could bring myself to finish was #3. We've all got opinions, and you know people say about opinions. People just don't make sense to me. How could people hate DS3 so much that you hope Obsidian never gets the rights to make another, then turn around and buy Diablo 3 for their 360 or PS3? I cannot be convinced there are not overlapping people here.

My two cents: This game has no superior when it comes to the specific niche it fills. Think about this: 1) What other couch co-op RPGs are there? There's Magika, Dungeons & Dragons: Daggerdale, and uhhhh... Crimson Alliance isn't really an RPG. Neither is Marvel Ultimate Alliance. 2) How many co-ops do you know of that allow players to vote on dialog choices? None of the aforementioned games even have dialog choices at all. ------ Granted, I'd choose Fallout New Vegas over DS3 if I'm playing alone, but this game made it possible for me to enjoy a real RPG while spending time with my girlfriend. She likes playing LEGO games and Torchlight, but can't handle FPSs or the like. She can't even stand split-screen. DS3's controls are so easy, you can play co-op with someone who isn't necessarily a gamer. The story is on par with the greatest RPGs out there, and the combat is fluid and intuitive. I seriously can't relate to anyone who doesn't like this game. It's the only fully-featured, hardcore couch co-op RPG there is; it has no equal.

I already own it, but it was the disc version. I bought the game again (how could I not at $2) just to show Obsidian support. I <3 Obsidian http://store.steampowered.com/app/34010/

You're wrong. Have fun with that. Remember me saying people argue too much on this forum? Yeah.

I actually see that as a good thing.

Oh, my. Other eople have different opinions than Morgoth. On the Obsidian boards. The horror. (Meant as a joke) That was a funny, and well deserved slap in the face.

Incorrect. I beat the game with 4-player co-op - two on the couch, two online. It was magic. Nay-sayer.

Totally. Without trying to sound silliy, that help menu was really helpful.

THANK YOU!!!

Yeah, they slipped since I originally looked. HOWEVER: The ratings on consoles are 2 stars higher than they are on PC, yes? Same game, yes? I may have had a point, yes? We argue too much on this forum.

Amazon

Well said. I'd like to add to your argument: Fallout 3 and New Vegas are almost nothing like Fallout 1, 2, and Tactics either. I know it's just my opinion, but I think the FPS versions of Fallout are WAY more fun than the old top-down, 2D RPGs. Not to mention - all those bad reviews for Dungeon Siege III everyone keeps talking about? On consoles; DS3 typically gets a 4 out of 5. On PC; typically a 1 out of 5. Odd, don't you think? Especially considering the game actually runs better and looks better on PC... It's almost as if... console-users were just judging the game for what it is. Imagine that.

lol. I get it, dude. Seriously though, I know there is no sky to begin with, but what would be so bad about just seeing black above the map models? Think of Torchlight. What's outside their map models? Nothing. Just black. It's not so bad and unprofessional as some want to believe. We all agree it would hinder you in battle, but there have been some cool pan-shots where I was quite impressed with the visual, and if I walked over to that area later, I still couldn't quite look at what I was shown earlier. You know, like the shot of the outside of the house in the beginning of the game? -and when you're down in the mines when you get cool quick glimpses of the crystal structures? That stuff was COOL! I just want to look a second longer at stuff like that. I don't need to see the sky. I want to stare straight at what's already there sometimes. It would simply be a neat feature to have the ability (even if only while you stood still) to free-look when you wanted to. I understand if the dev's don't want to do it. Even if they didn't, I can't stress enough that I absolutely love this game as-is.

I agree with you wholeheartedly, but you forgot : Option C Make fun of him. -and that's what I did.

lol. Thanks, I got it You can stop. lmao