-
Posts
5623 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
20
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Everything posted by BruceVC
-
Why would you say that? I haven't seen anything that would indicate she's not real. I agree, also this is one of the best days to raise issues around gender inequality. Our Womens Day is in August and its a very significant day due to societal problems like the high levels of violence aagainst women in South Africa
-
I assume real ? Surly you don't expect some kind of subterfuge
-
No Kaine, even though you could get that information from the graph the purpose of it is to highligh the income gap difference between men and women
-
Relevant post, but it still highlights the obvious income gap in the USA. Loads of work still to do
-
Its really refreshing and good to see an American on these forums saying something positive about there country and not seeing Obama as a complete and utter failure. So thanks for this post
-
Any usage of pro-Russian fakes would come as no surprise to me
-
Has anyone else been concerned that a policy of "They speak our language, they're our citizens" effectively means the UK is obliged to invade most of the planet? Hi Walsie
-
The Case for Romance II
BruceVC replied to Gfted1's topic in Pillars of Eternity: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)
Okay. So you don't have a problem with other people romancing and having sex with cats. So as long it's humanoid, it's okay for you? What about in sci-fi crpgs. Would you romance a robot as long as it looked humanoid? Well a Khajiit isn't a cat, its race that has the appearance of a cat. But it is as intelligent and emotional as a human. And another good question around a robot. If you take a TV series like Almost Human you basically have robots\cyborgs that look and can behave like humans. You also have "sexbots" in that show which humans use for physical gratification. So to answer your question if a robot looks and behaves like a human then I don't see it being a problem for a Romance option? But I can see how that may be a controversial one..because does a robot truly understand human emotion which is a big part of interaction in Romance -
The Case for Romance II
BruceVC replied to Gfted1's topic in Pillars of Eternity: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)
So Orcs are okay. What about a Khajiit (cat person) in Skyrim? Could you play that type of race or romance one? is it too 'animal' or are you okay with cats? I think if someone wants to Romance a Khajiit thats fine. I wouldn't, the rule generally is people Romance humanoid creatures and thats what differentiates a Centaur from an Orc or Khajiit -
The Case for Romance II
BruceVC replied to Gfted1's topic in Pillars of Eternity: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)
What if a centaur was a playable race and you could romance an elf with your Centaur? Would this be okay? It still fits into the playable and available race to be a Centaur. Mmmm..a valid question. I would be cautious to criticze fellow promancers but personally I wouldn't engage in that type of Romance option. And obviously Romance with a elf or even a Orc would be fine but I typically only initiate Romance with humans, elfs, half-elfs and other similar types of races. Remember you need to be able to RP a Romance encounter and I just wouldn't be able to get my head around a Centaur -
The Case for Romance II
BruceVC replied to Gfted1's topic in Pillars of Eternity: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)
Dude, serioulsy, where do you find these things -
The Case for Romance II
BruceVC replied to Gfted1's topic in Pillars of Eternity: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)
I don't have an issue with any Romance with any availible race, but with an animal I have to draw the line. A Centaur is a good question....I consider that physiologically more like an animal so I would have to say no !!! -
I think Obama has been the greatest USA president I have ever seen in my life, and I'm sure history will remember him favorably. There are many people on these forums who I like and respect immensely but don't like Obama, like GD, and thats fine. We all have our own opinions and perspectives. One thing that people must realize is that I see Obama from an outsiders perspective. And trust me when I say this is that from a global view George W Bush was much more unliked and reviled and fairly or unfairly tarnished the image of the USA that America still has to deal with. For example when the USA was considering attacking Syria due to there contravention of using Chemical weapons the standard response was " oh another country that the USA wants to invade for oil, like Iraq" Anyway here is a good link that raises some of the positive things that Obama has done http://whatthe****hasobamadonesofar.com/
-
The Case for Romance II
BruceVC replied to Gfted1's topic in Pillars of Eternity: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)
Hiro I think you just need to be direct, no need to be ambiguous. You are asking if in PoE there will be the opportunity to Romance a Sheep. And we get it, you are Australian. You are among friends here, you can be honest -
The Case for Romance II
BruceVC replied to Gfted1's topic in Pillars of Eternity: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)
As opposed to the subject matter that came before it? Romance itself has nothing to do with PoE, since it won't have any. Which is why I'm completely baffled that the other thread has been allowed to exist here and even spawn a sequel. I mean, am I free to start a thread called: "the case for first person shooter mechanics" here on the PoE forums without it getting locked or moved? Just curious. No thats not applicable, there is much more interest and opinion around Romance than a topic called "the case for first person shooter mechanics" and I think you know this. That would be my logical reason for the Mods creating an extended "Case for Romance 2" -
The Case for Romance II
BruceVC replied to Gfted1's topic in Pillars of Eternity: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)
You mean this conversation that has nothing to do with PoE? This conversation that's devolved into one of prepubescent sexual innuendos? Yeah that same one, the same one that you've been an active participant in -
The Case for Romance II
BruceVC replied to Gfted1's topic in Pillars of Eternity: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)
Nice, good thinking Gfted1 -
The Case for Romance.
BruceVC replied to NanoPaladin's topic in Pillars of Eternity: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)
Squeakymeister whats your favorite RPG of all time ? -
Someone had to. Geez that was beautiful, beautiful and haunting
-
Why weren't you at work today Woldan ?
-
okay that really made me laugh....kudos...
-
Whats your view on the Drone Strike strategy Kgambit. I consider you well informed in these matters?
-
Yes and Yemen is also a hotbed of Islamic fundamentalism I am not saying that there haven't been civilian causalities and that is always reregrettable. But don't kid yourself, this is a war. Drone strikes are carefully planned and are used as part of the USA military strategy when they cannot use conventional armed forces, like ground troops. Also just for the record the president of Yemen allowed most of the drone strikes bebecause his already fragile rule is threatened by Al-Qaeda in Yemen
-
I had a sig on the BSN. It read "For every copy of DA2 that you don't buy, I'm buying seven". You have no idea how many people not only too that seriousy, but PM'd me about it. that is genius, what was the general view of people who PM you?
-
So you would prefer the USA sending ground troops into western Pakistan to kill the members of the Taliban and Al-Qaeda who were actively involved in the insurgency in Afghanistan?