BruceVC

@kanisatha Kanie I agree with this but I would frame it differently I always go through a period of having to learn the mechanics of combat in games where its " complicated " and mostly when its around using a Controller instead of M\KB I did that now with W2&3 What Im suggesting is dont avoid combat because you not good at it, rather spend a few hours learning it. Then you not forced to only adopt one type of strategy I remember in Exanima I spent at least 5-6 hours in the combat learning part of the game because of how complicated and realistic the combat physics are And its always worth it once you know you can be effective in combat, it just makes the game more entertaining but it requires an investment in time

It sounds like its really delivering nicely similar to KCD1 , good to know Have you come across any Romance arcs?

I dont think its necessary for too much drama on this one? If you read the second link its specific about what the focus is going to be and its about cartels and transnational criminal organisations And the link clarifies the 4 main priorities, they seem very reasonable to me around targeting of these types of criminal syndicates? @Elerond read the second link, what do you think?

The APNEWS article summarizes nicely all the issues and legitimate concerns around this latest " idea" from Trump Good read

But I assume this is classic Trump classic " distraction tactics " so he can get the media focusing on this so he can push through his appointments or other policies This Gaza idea makes no sense for many reasons that include the Palestinians wont agree to it The entire ME wont agree to it except for Israel who is going to invest in Gaza and build hotels when there is so much instability around security Worst idea I have ever heard, maybe Trumps age is showing with this type of delusional suggestion

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/2/5/trump-says-us-will-take-over-and-own-gaza-in-redevelopment-plan Trumps going to solve the decades long Palestinian conflict by the US taking control of Gaza and turning it into the " the Riviera of the Middle East”. Definitely the dumbest and most unrealistic solution I have ever heard about a permanent solution to peace

Why wouldnt you give Trump credit for that? He has influence on Netanyahu and the ceasefire has maintained. Biden simply didnt have the same influence as Trump in the ME Trump made ending that conflict one of his campaign commitments and it mattered to him that it ended

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/02/03/americas/el-salvador-migrant-deal-marco-rubio-intl-hnk/index.html Heres an interesting development, El Salvador has offered to incarcerate criminals who are either US citizens or illegal migrants if they paid " In an act of extraordinary friendship to our country … (El Salvador) has agreed to the most unprecedented and extraordinary migratory agreement anywhere in the world,” Rubio told reporters Monday. The country will continue accepting Salvadoran deportees who illegally entered the US, he said. It will also “accept for deportation any illegal alien in the United States who is a criminal from any nationality, be they MS-13 or Tren de Aragua and house them in his jails,” he said – referring to two notorious transnational gangs with members from El Salvador and Venezuela. In addition, Bukele “has offered to house in his jails dangerous American criminals in custody in our country, including those of US citizenship and legal residents,” Rubio said."

Thats not true, Canada is now appointing a Fentanyl Tzar But this is now what Canada has agreed on and yes some of this was already agreed on but some of it will be new? " Trudeau said Canada was implementing a $1.3bn (£1bn) border plan that included nearly 10,000 frontline workers and more resources to halt the flow of fentanyl, a synthetic drug 50 times stronger than heroin, which Trump has cited as a major concern. The prime minister also said Canada would appoint a "fentanyl czar" and launch a joint strike force with the US to combat crime, fentanyl and money laundering. Much of the border security plan had already been announced by Canada in December. It includes enhanced co-ordination with US law enforcement, increased information sharing, limiting traffic at the border, and the deployment of drones and Black Hawk helicopters for surveillance." https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c87d5rlee52o

@Malcador I thought you would find this funny

True But governments often do the same thing as people when it comes to Trumps comments. In South Africa the media is almost entirely talking about Trumps comments around aid being cut and the expropriation bill Heres the thing about Trump to understand what motivates him. His image is everything to him and he is obsessed with claiming credit for things that he said he would do. There is nothing he loves better than standing up at a rally and saying " I told you I would get x or y done " and then all his MAGA supporters start cheering And sometimes he should get credit, like the part he played in ending the latest Israeli vs Palestinian conflict, and sometimes he will claim credit for things that he hasnt solved or he didnt do much to solve. For example he claimed he defeated ISIS in the ME So the tariffs threat on both Mexico and Canada were largely about the Fentanyl crisis and how Trump had committed to resolving it Now he can claim " I have done something about the dugs and Fentanyl" but IMO it wont make much of a difference When has the war on drugs ever been won, Reagan tried this and failed. Its almost impossible to stop the reality of drug smuggling when you have the reality of supply and demand But Trump will claim victory because both Mexico and Canada have agreed to make additional steps to combat Fentanyl smuggling Whats much more significant to me is Panama agreeing to not renew its involvement in the Chinese Belt and Road initiative. This was an achievable and understandable goal for Trump considering the geographical and economic importance of the Panama canal to the USA https://financialpost.com/pmn/business-pmn/rubio-calls-chinese-influence-over-panama-canal-unacceptable " Mulino also said his country would not renew its participation in China’s Belt and Road Initiative, making Panama the first Latin American country to do so. He added that his government will evaluate whether to pull out before its current agreement ends in 2026. "

So there isnt going to be a war between Canada and the US ???? You mean to say after all this drama Trump didnt implement tariffs on Mexico OR Canada I tell you, I just cant understand it. SM has lied to me again Like I said before its going to be a long 4 years and the biggest risk is outrage exhaustion, try to avoid that

I am about 20 hours into W3 EE and this was my 2nd best favourite RPG of all time but now Im using the mods but particularly a complex overhaul mod called W3EE Redux https://www.nexusmods.com/witcher3/mods/5802 Its been fantastic so far and W3 EE and several mods improves and expands on everything I wanted. W3 EE comes with its own built-in mods like All Quest Objectives on MAP The hardest part for me was getting use to the Controller and its mechanics like assigning and using bombs and potions but I am comfortable with all that now I did have to learn basic Script Merger functionality which is necessary to install W3EE Redux and how you need to merge certain files when you first install it but the W3EE Redux documentation explains how you do this I did have one bug with a weight increase mod that caused my vigor to stop regenerating but I uninstalled it and used another weigh increase mod and that worked fine And my game so far is very stable and everything is working as expected, Im doing all the side quests in White Orchid before I go kill the Griffin I really appreciate and prefer open-world RPGS, I am a huge fan of exploration and finding Easter eggs and random points of interest

Where Trump is wrong is where he assumes the bill has been acted on and land has been seized without compensation But its not a case of "nothing to see " because the legislation now exists So we will have to wait and see how its implemented As I have often said the quickest way to destroy our economic trajectory is to start nationalizing and expropriating assets without compensation And this is something that several ' socialist " and radical left parties like the EFF and MK believe should happen immediately but they only represent 23% in parliament

No nothing to do with that, this is about an unnecessary expropriation bill the ANC signed recently and Trump is making certain incorrect assumptions about this bill https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvg9w4n6gp5o " The new law allows for expropriation without compensation only in circumstances where it is "just and equitable and in the public interest" to do so. This includes if the property is not being used and there's no intention to either develop or make money from it or when it poses a risk to people. The president's spokesperson Vincent Magwenya said that, under the law, the state "may not expropriate property arbitrarily or for a purpose other than... in the public interest". "Expropriation may not be exercised unless the expropriating authority has without success attempted to reach an agreement with the owner," he added. " Its not so much about the failed Zimbabwe land grabs but there are risks because what does " in the public interests " really mean and does this apply to farm land and title deeds? But the bill does allow the state to expropriate land without compensation and thats where the domestic criticism come from

Yes I think its a huge reason for the rise of right-wing support What do you think the reasons are if migration is not one of the main reasons?

One of the main reasons why the right is seeing such success is because of the migration crisis and how many governments have failed to understand this and deal with this The left and Liberals dont seem to understand this despite the years of unhappiness around not seeing the levels of EU migration as a problem. Im surprised you not aware of this considering the rise of the AfD that gained much support because of the well-meaning but terrible Merkel era around the Syrian refugee crisis The failure to address migration has pushed more people towards the right that typically wouldnt have voted for right-wing parties and this is unfortunate because I definitely believe in the EU and what it represents And this is not unique to the EU, its the same in countries like South Africa and the US where migration and the failures to meaningfully address it has also become a massive voting issue

Obviously there will be no war between SA and Rwanda Its about the pointless deployment of SA troops in the DRC and we unintentionally fighting on the side that has a militant group linked to the 1994 Rwanda genocide called the FDLR and the other side consists of DRC ethnic Tutsis who say they fighting for there survival and they backed by Rwanda who is also Tutsi So Rwanda is asking why we fighting on the side that has a group implicated in the 1994 genocide and we are suppose to be very opposed to any genocide if you think of the recent Israel ICJ case which is now become a real local media outrage talking point about our DRC deployment And then our government makes things more confusing by saying publicly we in a peacekeeping role but we not in peacekeeping role, that was the UN force and we in the SADC force which is an offensive force But then our troops dont have the right equipment and thats why we lost 13 soldiers In summary its a confusing tribal conflict that is thousands of KM from SA borders and there is no reason we should have troops involved in an offensive role. End of the day countries on the border of the DRC should be deploying troops but peace will only be achieved through direct peace talks between the M23 and the DRC And the DRC failed to sign an agreement that was agreed on last year that Angola tried to broker https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/rwandan-foreign-minister-says-congo-refused-sign-deal-ease-m23-conflict-2024-10-05/

No offense but I question any article that starts off with " In 2024, reflecting a popular Western belief, former Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin said: “NATO is the most powerful and successful alliance in history.” Yet just two years earlier in 2022, after a 15-year campaign, NATO was defeated by the Taliban, a rag-tag group of poorly armed insurgents. " NATO was never defeated by the Taliban, they failed to end an insurgency and fighting an insurgency is not the same as conventional war because there are a myriad of factors that can cause an insurgency to continue It would be like saying the " USSR was defeated by an insurgency in Afghanistan " but in both cases the war drags on and it becomes too economically costly and then the occupying forces leave the country Its not the same as a defeat in normal wars like WW2 and the Axis powers where they ended up surrendering

Really funny

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/1/28/us-senate-blocks-bill-sanctioning-icc-over-israeli-arrest-warrants The Senate has blocked the proposed US sanctions on the ICC because of the issuing of warrants on Netanyahu and others Its a good move by the Senate, this type of sanction was unhelpful and concerning

I wonder if made sure he got royalties for the Netflix series?

Dont tell me...please dont tell you didnt do what I think you did You sold Forkcat and now its gone global and made billions !!!! Why Melkie, why

https://www.eurogamer.net/ever-wondered-what-the-author-of-the-witcher-books-thinks-about-the-games I have mentioned how much I enjoy the overall narrative and then the narrative choices in all Witcher games and its a big part of the appeal for me I found this interesting 2012 interview with Sapkowski and he mentions how he is not fan of the narrative direction and outcomes in the games but he recognises how the games are good overall as Witcher products and marketing ""Maybe it's time to set the matters straight," he went on. "'The Witcher' is a well made video game, its success is well deserved and the creators deserve all the splendour and honour due. But in no way can it be considered to be an 'alternative version', nor a 'sequel' to the witcher Geralt stories. Because this can only be told by Geralt's creator. A certain Andrzej Sapkowski." TBH he comes across as a little bitter and overly critical of the artistic style in the Witcher games if you read the interview But he is entitled to his opinion as the creator of the original story and we know the games arent canon

Can you give me your opinion on something because you often respond in an objective and reasonable way The PEPFAR funding has been temporarily suspended and several clinics dependant on that US funding have closed until this funding comes back https://www.npr.org/sections/goats-and-soda/2025/01/28/g-s1-45030/pepfar-trump-drugs-stop-work But my question is why is the US seen as the only country that can provide this aid? I realize this is the reality but why Its the same as my point about the WHO South Africa is part of BRICS and one of the main objectives of BRICS is to create a multi-polar world and the definition of a multi-polar world is literally about different seats of power and influence So you would assume that if the US stops any funding of any institution then BRICS can step in and deliver on one of its core objective, that is one way to create a real multipolar world. It has to be about more than grandstanding and statements. It must be about action and when Trump pulls back this is an opportunity for the likes of BRICS But people dont even consider this, it seems if the US doesnt do it then these institutions will collapse? I know this is a question that BRICS and South Africa should answer but Im interested in what you think? BRICS has several of the wealthiest top 10 countries in the world and its not like they cant afford it and there objective clearly stated is this belief for support for the global south which this funding impacts the most End of the day I see this strange contradiction around US influence and it manifests itself in examples like this . Many detractors of the US criticism the US for insidious imperial tendencies and how it uses funding to influence its own geopolitical aspirations. And now when this funding ends or is suspended I hear " OMG, the US has stopped funding. How are we going to survive " It creates this impression the US is the only country that can provide this aid ? So my question is a simple one, if the US economy collapsed and it couldnt provide this aid what would happen? I do believe in a multipolar world because there are already different seats of power and wealth. Is this not the time to demonstrate that belief and not be reliant and assume only the US can provide this funding? And @Malcador and others your views would also be appreciated