obyknven

World of Tanks creator Victor Kislyi (CEO and founder, Wargaming) gives his keynote speech at the 2013 D.I.C.E. SUMMIT. Titled "The Evolution of Free-To-Play: From Tanks And Beyond". http://youtu.be/WpNFlzeGqW8

How many roubles? How many troubles? I fix you. Obviously, all beautiful Russian girls have powerful patrons. Anyway around them always many men's, who been happy beat/kill arrogant abuser. Your question very dangerous for you, at least if you try ask this IRL. Prostitutes In Russian society have extremely low social status and only ugliest (or foreign) girls have this job. Russian mens don't like prostitutes too, because only losers (or foreigners ) buy love. http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2011/8/19/2372986/bellators-rasul-mirzaev-accused-of-murdering-student-in-russia http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/monacos-playboy-prince-battered-in-nightclub-692269 http://in.news.yahoo.com/russian-boxer-beats-man-death-104219726.html

Jeremy Clarkson (Top Gear) about Russia. http://londograd.livejournal.com/3126.html

Russians don't watch TV.

Christopher Jordan Dorner Manifesto: http://ru.scribd.com/doc/124401603/Dorner-Manifesto-FULL-TEXT

Why not? Russia is big and inhabited people with Chaotic Neutral alignment. Everything possible. It's just friendly advice for expats. Another advice is - avoid cheap everything. Russia have one of most expensive life, and all what cheap is fraud. I was surprised, when look apartments rented by one of Americans living there. This room just terrible, even poor Russian students rent extremely better apartments. The same-story about clothing, footwear, food and services etc. Russia is a bad place for greedy foreigners.

In this blog foreigners whining about terrible Russia. http://blackinrussia.wordpress.com/2013/02/07/a-ghanaian-medical-students-experience-in-st-petersburg/ If you are strong, smart and charismatic - Russia is excellent place for you. But if you are weakling - avoid Russia, because Russian culture intolerant to any weakness. Explanation is simple: Russia is land of Death, climate very harsh and kill you slowly. As if that is not enough, Russia don't have natural borders and can be invaded from any directions, and always exist danger of enemy infiltration in our society. Because this our culture have paranoid (any considered as potential enemy), warlike and Darwinist (alpha-males cult) character. Our alpha-males cult - it's real reason why we looks so rude for foreigners. For determination own place in males hierarchy, mens have aggressive behavior and harsh each another. Any weakness considered as reason for downgraded status in hierarchy. Because many foreigners constantly whining (showing how weak they are) - their status very low, and they considered as easy targets for aggression. Instead of stop to be looser, foreigners continue whining (adding sentences about skin color/ethnicity as reason for Russians intolerance).

Wrong. This tread about Russia.

http://youtu.be/F4hQ4J4BFOM

Resurrection of deleted tread go.

http://youtu.be/ZOrAs80s02o http://1onewolf.com/lakota/genocide.htm A group of Native Americans called the Lakota Freedom Delegation traveled to Washington, D.C., on 17 December 2007 and delivered a statement asserting the independence of the Lakota from the United States. The group argues that the recent declaration of independence is not a secession from the USA, but rather a reassertion of sovereignty. Their leader was Russell Means, one of the prominent members of the American Indian Movement in the late 1960s and 1970s. http://www.republicoflakotah.com/about-us/ Interesting what they can reach by this. If they create autonomous base for guerrilla - it's good(FARK/ELZN experience approve this), but they must have nuts for this. Comparison between Wounded Knee Incident and Idle no More actions showing how reducing number of people with nuts in US/Canada. http://1onewolf.com/lakota/society11.htm http://warriorpublications.wordpress.com/2012/12/12/idle-no-more-speak-for-yourself/

Although some of the authors that put forth the oligarchical criticism actually state that both oligarchy and democracy operate within the US system. Oligarchy - a system of rule by a few persons. Democracy is rule of the people. US can't be Democracy and Oligarchy in same time.

There are few signs as tell tale that someone is brainwashed or uninformed than someone using that term. Just to be clear, the US is a democratic republic. Simply stating that the United States is a representative republic is ambiguous, since a country can be a representative republic but not hold any sort of election for the representatives. Democracy is straight up defined as: A country does not need to be a direct democracy in order to be classified as a democracy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_types_of_democracy#Types_of_democracy The US is both a democracy and a republic. The terms are not mutually exclusive. Such nonsense! In fact, the government of the United States is based on Spartan Republic and the Roman Republic model. But these states are pure Oligarchy. Because this US can't be Democratic.

Really don't understand, how driver license can protect you from road accidents. At least these licenses purely useless for 37 000 peoples who die every year in crashes.

Stop using term "Democracy" for representative Republics. They are completely different. Modern "democracies" originating not in Athenian democracy but in European feudalism and culminating in liberal capitalism, the major milestones, like Magna Carta and 1688, mark the ascent of the propertied classes. In this case, it is not a question of peasants liberating themselves from the political domination of their overlords but lords themselves asserting their independent powers against the claims of monarchy. This is the origin of modern constitutional principles, ideas of limited government, the separation of powers, and so on: principles which have displaced the social implications of 'rule by the demos' such as balance of power between rich and poor, as the central criterion of "democracy". If citizenship is the constitutive concept of ancient democracy, the founding principle of the other variety is, perhaps, lordship. The Athenian citizen claimed to be masterless, a servant to no mortal man. He owed no service or deference to any lord, nor did he waste his labour to enrich a tyrant by his toil. The freedom, eleutheria, entailed by his citizenship was the freedom of the demos from his lordship. Magna Carta, in contrast, was a charter not of a masterless demos but of masters themselves, asserting feudal privileges and freedom of lordship against both Crown and popular multitude, just as the liberty of 1688 represented the privilege of propertied gentlemen, their freedom to dispose of their property and servants at will. In true democracies no lawyers or other intermediaries between society and power exists , no Machinery of government exists, people vote on policy initiatives directly. In Athens, there was no such clear division between 'state' and 'civil society', no distinct and autonomous 'economy', not even a conception of the state as distinct from the community of citizens, no state of 'Athens' or 'Attica', only 'the Athenians'. Or look at modern military forces. They are most important part of government machine and the are pure totalitarian. Meanwhile in true democracies army voting too, and elect (delegate) generals for execute own decisions. Examples of this you can find in Anabasis (Xenophon). Actually, true democracies exists now, but they are not part of Western "democratic" states. And West can blame them as "terrorists" in any moment. http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/andrew/zap_asr.html

Big Brother Is Watching You http://youtu.be/QGxNyaXfJsA

Conrad Nomicos from "This Immortal" by Roger Zelazny, do similar things. Through actions such as the deconstruction of the pyramids, Conrad makes the Vegans see that Earthlings would rather destroy the planet's riches than see them fall into the hands of others. On other side, nobody interests these texts before, but when they are destroyed all begin whining about them. Actually you can easy find medieval sacred texts in Internet and read them. But you don't do this, because you don't want read boring texts written by primitive ancestors. Do you worried about this loss, only because your media say do this?

Excellent example of Syrian army stupidity. Tank in city ( without infantry support ) don't live long. http://youtu.be/Q0qa3IcgHX0 RPG-29 "Vampire". In 2006 Lebanon war this weapon stopped Israel tanks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RPG-29

Wrong. Modern tanks can be destroyed by skilled infantry unit with RPG's, if they use properly tactics. Especially in city fight. All tanks have weak points, where they can be penetrated even by retarded RPG-7. But all sides of this conflict can't into tactics and have low skills.

Now i find what you talking about. In near past "Human Right Watch" usurp this term for homicides performed by Muslims. They describe this as Islamic cultural tradition. Obviously it is rude propaganda. 1. Murders are not aristocrats, or warriors, or tribal members. They are lumpen, they can't worried about honor. 2, Must be Islamic Code of Honor, described these homicides as legitimate punishment. This code must be widespread, because these murders have origins around the world. I never hear about something similar from Muslims. 3. Murders are not educated, and almost known nothing about own culture. It's cannot be Islamic cultural tradition. 4. Muslims consider these murders as criminals. Actually i very surprising by this situation. Your media especially spreading Islamophobic propaganda and discredit honor killings as form of people self-defiance. Russians have different point of view on this. When in near time, family of Christians kill own adult daughter ( some sort of exorcism), nobody don't naming this as honor killing. These crimes we consider as maniacal killings or domestic murder. Honor killing it's when Vitaly Kaloyev kill Peter Nielsen, at least for us. http://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/carroll/article/A-revenge-killing-in-Switzerland-3694365.php

It's not honor killing. What can known about honor these cowardly loosers, who kill only because they try hide something incriminating thing? Real honor killings not different from Vendetta or Blood Feud. In other words, its when family opens a quest for "blood revenge" to kill the person they consider guilty of murdering or raping their relative. It's practice prevent crime in tribal communities.

My personal point of view: Idea, what bombings of citizens and destruction of their land infrastructure can help them looks so idiotic for me. Problems like this (Syria, Afghanistan, Mali) can't be resolved by military power. Look at Afghanistan for example. NATO fight there against Taliban to long, but can't win. Taliban popularity only increasing from this, their number are increasing, their influence spreading on neighbor regions. It's happen because external military intervention legalize their power. Without external enemy any radical regimes can't exist to long, people exhausted from this to fast and overthrow their. Anyway it must be own citizens decision. At last times West forgot about National self-determination right, but it's one of most important democratic right. If your government violate this, it's mean they are non-democratic IRL. P.S. Actually we have more freedom in Russia, than in any Western country. We always been too anarchic, government controls only most important sites, 90 % of territory have autonomous life. In time of civil war Germans occupied Ukraine and use 1 million soldiers for control this small part of Russia, but fail. Makhno and Petliura approve this. Because this, all these talks about repressions looks so non correct.

What wrong with honor killings? It's just form of justice in societies without repressive apparatus (police/jails etc). Anyway its better, when victim side make revenge, than delegate this right to government.