obyknven
Members.
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by obyknven
-
-
European Historian madskillz detected. Central Asian tribes initially are East Iranians. Google Turan from Avesta. Their Aryan-Turanids war's reflected in many Indo-European mythologies. Funny when someone from European periphery of Aryan world mumbling something about mongols crap from Turan. In medieval period East Iranians are defeated by Turkic peoples and migrate. Central Asia become Turkic land from this time. But Turks <> Mongols anyway. Mongol's obviously from Mongolia, not from Central Asia. We have more respect to them than to better Europeans. At last only Batu-Khan conquered Russians, meanwhile European loosers constantly fail this goal. Your dismissive tone about them looks so stupid for us. Turks are cool also (True Turks, nor Turkizied Greeks from Ottoman Empire). Only Timur help to Russian's crush Golden Horde, meanwhile Europeans always had been allied with this "mongol crap" as you say. Just for your education. True Turks: http://youtu.be/MbgGXTM5UJs Mongols: http://youtu.be/1NJKEFcCmZI It's reason why i don't play into pseudo-historical games. Too many rude errors, lie and modern stereotypes here. Because this pure fantasy settings are better.
-
Russian poet cosplay Soviet spy in German uniform. Propagand poster "Germans eat's bread of our childrens!" Propaganda poster "True Aryan must be tall, thin, blonde. Lector is scienist-racolog Julius Strainer ( also 100% Aryan ) ". In time of WW2 European pretensions to be a pureblood Aryans make Russians lol. In modern time typical Russian art suddenly causing European butthurt. They cry: "It's Nazi propaganda". Russians answer is simple: "You are mad. Our country destroy Nazism, and this is typica art in social realism style. As Victors in WW2 we send you GTFO".
-
-
I've yet to see the contents of a man's blood or the colour of his skin make a tuppeny f***'s worth of difference. I find your obsession with proving 'racial' inheritance one way or another a bit creepy. Really don't understand why fixing of rude errors performed by unaccurete ( or too politizied ) historians looks creepy for you. Or meybe you want moar proofs? Ok, i can moar. Modern Turkizied descendants of Volga-Bulgars named as Tatars. Mahmud al-Kashgari in XI century wrote: "Turks use name Tatars for Farsi-speakers". Turks also use this name for Chinese people and other non-Turkic foreighners. In ancient Turkic language "Tat" mean alien outlander. Very strange name for "Turkic" people really. Or again Ahmad ibn Fadlan mentioned Bulgar ruler as Malik of As-Sakaliba. Two interpritation can be here. "Sakaliba" (Saqaliba) in Arabic is "White Saka", a calque from the endoethnonym "Kipchak", which in Turkic means "White Sak", continuing the tradition started by Herodotus that Persians call Scythians "Saka". Or alternative meaning can be - It is generally thought that the Arabic term is a Byzantine loanword: saqlab, siklab, saqlabi etc. is a corruption of Greek Sklavinoi meaning Slavs. Anyway Central Asian Iranians or a Slavs are not Turkic people.
-
Don't trust to popular science. As example upcoming "historic" book "Armies of the Volga Bulgars & Khanate of Kazan" by Osprey publishing. http://www.ospreypublishing.com/store/Armies-of-the-Volga-Bulgars-and-Khanate-of-Kazan_9781782000792 Book illustration of Ottoman-fashioned Bulgars must cause recognition from European reader: "Oh, they are Turks!". But Bulgar language is not Turkic. Only one language from Bulgar group is survieved. It is Chuvash language. From "Introduction to Altaic philology: Turkic, Mongolian, Manchu" by Igor de Rachewiltz and Volker Rybatzki. Chapter One: Chuvash-Turkic Other work show common root's of Old Bulgar language with Pamir languages (i.e. Eastern Iranian languages, for example Avestan language is often classified as early Eastern Iranian ).From "The language of the Asparukh and Kuber Bulgars, Vocabulary and grammar" by Peter Dobrev. Mediaval autors don't known about Turkic nature of Bulgars. Ahmad ibn Fadlan write about Bulgars: "They have a lot of merchants who journey to the land of the Turks," http://www.s155239215.onlinehome.us/turkic/10_History/IbnFadlanEn.htm#Bulgars And last thing. Turks firstly appears in VI century AD in Rouran Khaganate. The early Bulgars (or "Proto-Bulgars") may have been present in the Pontic Steppe from the 2nd century, later Bulgars took part in the Hunnic raids on Central and Western Europe between 377 and 453. In this time no Turks exist yet. But people don't read historic sources, or serious scientific books.
Beloved by West Syrian rebels use chemical weapon. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/09/us-syria-crisis-chemical-russia-idUSBRE9680YZ20130709
1. A revolution (from the Latin revolutio, "a turn around") is a fundamental change in power or organizational structures that takes place in a relatively short period of time. Changing one government (national) to another (pro-West puppets) is not revolution. It's, Coup d'état, or putch or overthrow. Stop using honorable term to neoliberal dirty foreign politics. Revolutions extremely rare ( French Revolution, October Revolution, Cuban Revolution ) and they have significant influence to whole World. 2. Venezuela have leftist people-oriented government now, people revolution can't be here, only counterrevolution. 3. Every year after USSR dissolving some "experts" crying about near revolution in Russia. We laugh when yet another "expert" cry about near revolution somewhere. People are lazy and don't want die for glory of some foreign nation. All last putches performed by mercenaries and even these professionals often fail (as we see in Syria now). And mercs want money, huge amount of money, even such rich nation as USA cant paid to them constantly. In other word US can't causing two rebellion's in different states in same times, near overthrow in Venezuela is fantasy. Snowden as ex-CIA member known this, anyway this guy better informed about real world than typical US commoner. If he make decision go to Venezuela - it's mean near rebellion cant be here.
Incredible level of ignorance. Defending Acfrican and Native American bro's is traditional sport of Russian supermacists. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolay_Leontiev http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Italo-Ethiopian_War http://www.katari.org/archives/juan-belaieff-ruso-en-paraguay Though i understand why anglo-saxon colonialists can't understand such behaviour. Our National idea too alien and difficult for them.
Fail compilation North-Caucasian region. Police attempt arrest two insurgents alive, but fail. Armed Insurgents resist to arrest and has been killed by return fire. Policemen become really sad after this (after any using of gun russian police must prove own innocence on trial) and evacuate (insurgents typically use suicide-bombers, car can be exploded in any moment). http://youtu.be/t0JcVgVn0RI Other video from this region. America is safe place in comparision to this. Even in such hellhole Russian police avoid kill people without reason. http://youtu.be/0Lqi4l3EJTY
Greedy NATO supply FAS by... T-55. They are serious? Just lol, where Muricans steal these tanks? From museums? Anyway rebels can't into tank's tactics. These idiots place tank on top of hill and soon anti-tank missile arrived. But G-d like fools, they stay alive in this accident. http://youtu.be/Jt8pNPKchbc
Wrong. Real reason only one. They are loosers and cowards. In any situation they begin shoot everywhere because so scary. http://youtu.be/v0Lq60aGoY0
Do you say it about UK? http://www.presstv.ir/detail/195600.html http://anarchyintheuk.com/uk-police-licensed-to-kill/
