You get that fun argument on exactly how to balance things out and "level the playing field." Short term processes to resolve it can cause issues in the long term and heighten racial / ethnic divides.
You want to make sure the minorities are not put at a disadvantage, and have the same opportunities as the majority. But depending on how you go about it, you can then end up where chunks of the population feel that the tail wags the dog.
To use the very rough metaphor; You have a group of 10 people. 2 of them are a minority, and have suffered a history of persecution and potential unconsidered discrimination. To balance it out, in any decision they get to have 3 votes each. The 8 remaining only have 1 vote each, and because of that, start to feel aggravated with the 2, which causes them to act out on the minority.
Long-term solutions and social psychology are a bitch to work with, and there is rarely a clean and simple answer to it.
Also of note that you might find interesting @BruceVC
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/david-lammy-lbc-african-caribbean-english-b1824029.html