Wrath of Dagon

The editor-in-chief is Bill Clinton's NAFTA guy.

Another anonymous accusation. The lawyer for women suing Epstein has interviewed Trump extensively and said he cooperated fully and she doesn't believe he was involved. Perhaps there is something to it, but an accusation which is more over politically convenient doesn't prove anything in itself.

My opinion of her just improved tremendously.

Underrail is great. I played it on normal and it was a good challenge. May be try it on easy if you're having so much trouble. Rat hounds shouldn't be that hard to kill, that's the starting enemy, you do have to heal quite a bit at first. Use stealth to avoid the tougher enemies, like the ****ing sentry robots. Don't forget you need a hackxor to hack and lockpicks to open locks. Use air vents when possible (need a multi-tool to open). Use the walkthrough on the wiki if necessary, that helps a lot. Psi powers do become very important later in the game, I think mind control winds up the most powerful, although I used thermal. What you guys say does apply to the end-game area which is quite a slog and I couldn't beat the final boss at all (I think you might need some kind of crafting here, as the in-game equipment just doesn't cut it anymore), but up until then it's a wonderful game. Edit: I have to warn you, if you think it's hard now, it gets really hard mid-game, you'll really need to search for solutions to certain seemingly impossible fights, although mines and stealth will usually solve them. You can find all the maps on the wiki also, although I preferred to just wander about until I came onto something, but you do need them for the end game.

Legally it's not a defense but under Obola's policies it is. Also having an anchor baby citizen gives them access to welfare benefits for the baby, access to free education, access to free healthcare. It's true if the government is trying to deport someone, the anchor baby might not help, but they won't be trying in the first place unless the parent is a serious criminal, and then only may be.

Bragging about how he gets away with sexual assault is a few steps beyond "something rude." Sounded consensual to me.

Hilzilla also said she wants a borderless North America, i.e. the end of her own country. But hey, Trump said something rude 10 years ago, that's much more important.

It's a pig.

The first thing is liberal control of the Supreme Court, so goodbye to all our rights. Second Hilzilla is a criminal and should be in prison. Third is open borders and the loss of sovereignty, fourth is a thousand other things I don't feel like enumerating. Edit: Also, more stuff like this: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/07/chuck-grassley-demands-answers-about-honduran-illegal-alien-accused-of-murdering-five/

You don't think I'm serious that the current government lies about everything? Yes, but what does "bad" mean to you? You'd probably enjoy living in a totalitarian system. Edit: Probably Hilzilla's term would look something like this: https://fee.org/articles/how-roman-central-planners-destroyed-their-economy/ But hey, they lasted for 1000 years! Edit2: Then there's this: http://nypost.com/2016/10/06/fbi-agents-are-ready-to-revolt-over-the-cozy-clinton-probe/ Yeay for gangster government!

They lie about everything else, so why not?

If Trump loses, next presidential election unless Republicans sell out on every conservative principle they won't have any chance. Well, unless Hilzilla messes up on an apocalyptic level.

The poll results for likely voters are heavily influenced by the turn-out model used, these models involve a lot of guesswork, see Brexit polling, etc. But my feeling is the 538 probabilities are pretty accurate at this moment and there's not much time left.

Government thinks the citizens are morons: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/10/05/washingtons-governing-elite-actually-think-americans-are-morons/

Well, OK, I did gloss over your saying he influenced other justices, since you seemed dismissive of him for mostly writing concurrences and dissents. And the article I was going to link but couldn't find gave him far more prominence than your words would suggest, so I'll admit my phrasing wasn't good. Edit: OK, I finally managed to find the other article: http://www.weeklystandard.com/giving-thomas-his-due/article/988078#

Not any different from the rest of the press.

There's nothing flimsy about it, they asked for a response and didn't get it. At least they're willing to report on subjects the mainstream media tries to cover up. Not everyone agrees with Gromnir's opinion of Justice Thomas: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/30/clarence-thomas-often-stands-alone-as-opinions-set/ http://thehill.com/regulation/other/202633-is-it-clarence-thomass-court I've read an even better article but can't find it now.

Why would I do that? I'm not publishing stories here. Do you really feel sending an email is digging deep? Do you want them to stake out the museum? I suppose since it's a government institution they could file a FOIA request, but that would probably take a year or more. And why not send them an email if you're interested in the answer, or are you just asking for argument's sake?

You can send the museum an email if you're interested. I don't know how they're supposed to dig deeper when the museum won't respond, not that it's so difficult to figure out what's going on anyway.

Circa that I linked above said this "Museum officials acknowledged that Thomas has "very little presence" in any of the exhibitions." Breitbart said that the museum did not return their inquiries.

Well, yes, a communist lens, she's a communist in case you don't know. Big hero in the Soviet Union too.

Do you understand how bizarre that argument is? A national museum does a major exhibition just because they happen to have a pin with a name on it. But they absolutely can not obtain any item of Thomas, or just put up a photo, and therefore have to skip over him entirely. lol

If you read the link right above your post, you'll see that they do have a lot on people. It would be a very strange African-American history museum without any African-Americans.

That would be pretty bizarre. Although he is still serving, so he might not fit the criteria for an exhibit. Is there an Obama exhibit? It would be interesting if they managed to get a reason out of the museum, instead of just relying on conjecture. There are also plenty of other conservatives in recent government posts, so if this really were a political issue, I'd imagine Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell would also be snubbed. They don't really have exhibits - as I understand it - on people. The items related to Obama (First Lady's Dress worn to the commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington, a "Librarians for Obama" pin, a portrait of Obama, etc) would be in the exhibition of post 1968 history, I believe. A search of their holdings show nothing connected to "Clarence Thomas", "Condoleezza Rice" or "Colin Powell". That said the only item associated with Anita Hill is a donated pin with "I belive Anita" on it. When they create the exhibits, they can only do so with what they actually have in their holdings, so the obvious question I'd have about this potential snub is did anyone try to donate items related to Justice Thomas and the museum refused the donation? Or is this a case of not spending time on someone that they have nothing in the collection to relate his story to? A lot of questions to ask on this one, I think, before leaping to "libruls". Surely if they wanted to include him in the exhibit, they could've asked for a significant item. They didn't seem to have that problem in including BLM. Edit: Apparently there's plenty on other people, including Anita Hill, but in fairness there isn't much on Thurgood Marshall either, but more than on Thomas: http://circa.com/politics/people/supreme-court-justice-clarence-thomas-ignored-by-national-museum-of-african-american-histo

African-American history museum snubs Clarence Thomas: http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/10/05/african-american-smithsonian-snubs-justice-clarence-thomas/