Skarpen

Nobody set a nativity scene ablaze. You made that up and try to pass it as reality.

Nope. It was Gromnir who did. As always you don't answer what was written, but invent something and then you discuss your own invention. The only way you might seem somewhat intelligent. A very simple thing. If you would ask 10.000 ppl what vandalizing a church mean you would not hear one person mentioning burning a sign. saying that PB vandalized a church is simply a lie.

You may engage in every mental gimnastics you want to fit your agenda. Still the phrase "they vandalized churches" do not describe the actual occurence.

And where did I say anything like that? It seems you guys always see more in my posts then what I write in them. Paranoid much? I only pointed that what he said is not true. Burning a terrorist group sign is not vandalism and looting a store is not peaceful protesting.

Doesn't seem like a group that would vandalize a church. Ah sure they burned BLM sign in front of a church. Funny how even the definition of vandalism changes when it's a group leftis doesn't like.

No, they weren't. They were applauded at the time by the media and liberal media. Did those celebs that spewed hateful nonsense for the past 4 years apologized? Maybe two on a dozen. Did Nancy Clinton or Pelosi appologized for Madonna comment or dozens of other comments? Since when this is even required? Oh, right because it's Republicans and not Democrats. As always you will do any mental somersault to explain that Dems doing something is perfectly ok and Republicans doing the exact same thing is reprehensible and evil to the core. As said before, pathethic.

Four years ago one of the ladies on "The View" said that military could throw Trump out of WH. Also Sarah Silverman called for military coup and you could probably find others more or less famous celebs saying this things. Painting this as something only Trump supporters would say is a little pathetic coming from a Dem. You can list a whole lot of idiotic comments after 2016 Trump win. From Madonna blowing up the WH to Johnny Depp asking when was the last time actor shot a president.

It's bad. Empty city, ugly NPC's that don't say a word, colors are grey and bland, there is no music and sounds are dreadful. The car is piece of crap, I preferred to go on foot. And that's just me going to the shop to pick up the game.

I don't want to read reviews, because I'm waiting for my new RTX that's coming from Tajikistan and I don't want to be disappointed that the work I put in to get this card was for nothing.

Huh? None of this applies to BG2. Did you even played those games?

I knew this, but I didn't know that Literally everyone who can?

Epic Game Store announced that next week free games will be Pillars of Eternity definitive edition and Tyranny Gold. Pretty surprising that they got their hands on those titles.

Why do you post this racist picture? That's disgusting.

Nice try stoodge Was Parler Hacked? (snopes.com)

That's funny because people are doing exactly that right now with Parler and the corporate stoodges and media pansies are going crazy because of it.

Your corporate masters must be so proud of you.

Huh? Then who did claim this: Because is seems to me you did claim this since it's your post and all.

What is even the point of replying to you if you don't even read what is being replied? That was never in question. You are backpedaling and running in circles.

I don't think it matters as the endgame seems to be Supreme Court.

I don't agree with that. First of all you mentioned banks in your previous post which are not "officials" by any definition and giving false information to them falls into completely separate category, so lets leave those out. Second of all bundling all "officials" into one category is incorrect. Talking to the health inspector or tax inspector is not the same thing as talking to the law enforcement. You have certain rights and obligations that vastly differ between different type of officials and law enforcement is a category in and of itself. You are making no sense. If FBI was looking into the differences between transcript and what was presented to VP, then what would you call those actions? They were making an investigation. And if they were investigation what Flynn said to VP, then who was Flynn in this investigation if not a suspect? And if by your own words he was lying to avoid charges then clearly he knew he was a suspect and could end up with charges. So it's clearly a situation I'm talking from the beginning, a law that penalizes lying to FBI is taking away the right to defense for suspect/accused. I don't know if your definition is correct. I was under impression that 5th amendment apply even if the person doesn't know said testimony would incriminate them and that it could be used to avoid all questions regardless of their nature and the nature of questioning. Was I incorrent in this?

Information given to banks etc. is a different matter and lying to those are covered by specific laws in criminal codes. So that's a separate issue. As I stated before lying to the police is only criminal if you are a witness. And for example in Poland accused/suspect doesn't give testimony, as I stated above. So that is also a separate issue and not to be bundled together by any means. From what I heard you have to specifically plead the fifth and in a specific way if you don't want to answer a question when questioned by lawmakers in USA. At least according to this guy: Don't Talk to the Police Redux (James Duane) - YouTube