Bartimaeus

I didn't know about that. That's pretty disappointing. Was there not even a warning that it was going to happen?

what just happened the 49ers are supposed to be garbage this season vikings are supposed to be close to wildcard quality what happened (e): on the other hand, packers are 1-0, and the rest of the NFC north is 0-1. that's a pretty nice change of pace from the past three years, where packers lost their opening game each year.

Bradford's tipped interception made me sad. Reminds me a little too uncomfortably of his Rams days.

I have one of the pretty few copies on Steam, fortunately. (e): ...though I have no idea if it works on Windows 8.1 or greater. What's the problem with the DVD?

I root for a lot of teams. Packers will always be my favorite first and foremost, and I'd never root against them...but I actually like all of the other NFC North teams, too...whenever they're not playing the Packers, of course. Currently like the Raiders, Giants, Broncos, Eagles, Cowboys, Bengals, and Bills all for reasons one or another as well. Most hated are Steelers (most of all others, always, ), Patriots, Seahawks, Buccaneers, Saints, Redskins. Probably a really odd list of teams to like and dislike, but hey, it is what it is. Most others I'm more or less ambivalent about.

I have a strange like for Sam Bradford, so personally, I'm rooting for them. Plus, with how terrible the Falcons defense were last season, a win seems likely, anyways.

On the other hand, Dez Bryant broke his foot...hope that win against the Giants is worth it, Cowboys.

I don't enjoy speculating on injuries enough to bother. Yeah, Giants pulling off some witchcraft in this game. I might as well just go to bed and accept that Dez Bryant ain't gonna get three to four touchdowns to make up for mediocrity of having Peyton Manning, Steve Smith Sr., and Brandon Cooks this week. Oh well: Packers won, Seahawks lost (and in hilarious fashion), and that's all that really matters.

I thought Cutler actually played pretty well...much better than he's played the Packers in years past, anyways. Very competitive until the very end. Peyton Manning, on the other hand...

Well, if the GOP wins the upcoming presidential election, they probably won't really need to work with the Democrats, anyways, as Republicans will control both sides of Congress (unless things really turn around for the Democrats, but the Republicans have a pretty large advantage in the House of Representatives, and a fairly large advantage in the Senate, too, so I doubt the Democrats seize control of either outright in the upcoming cycle, but I suppose it could happen), the Supreme Court, and the White House. That will be...interesting, to say the least, if that does happen (...and though I lean, I think, roughly slightly center-right - or maybe just roughly center - I must say that I don't feel comfortable in all of that happening).

Unfortunately, a lot of those Republican crazies are liked well enough by their constituents to actually be voted in, so I'd prefer the more equal motion of removing all crazies from all phases of the election process in general. ...Of course, one man's crazy is another man's realist or whatever else, I think the saying more or less goes, so there's no way to do that democratically.

Of course they want their preferred candidate to work with the opposition...by having the opposition concede and compromise with their preferred candidate, and never the other the other way around.

I like to keep Hitchen's razor in mind whenever I consider arguing with Bruce about something: perhaps you all should, too. (P.S.: Refer to my signature. )

That's one way to see things. But you see - the crusaders would say that they were overthrowing a usurper and restoring a rightful ruler to the throne. Also they hardly had monopoly on killing fellow Christians. Oh, of course. By modern standards, we'd consider pretty much everything that happened in...well, I was going to say the middle ages, but really, you can pretty much go back as far as you want, and you can go forward a bit too...to be barbarism. Back then, going on at least one of the first three Crusades was the greatest service to God you could possibly do. Nowadays, the goal posts seem to change quite a bit more from decade to decade than they did back then.

Not exactly the strongest condemnation of Christianity there, with all those uncertainities: I'd suggest using the Crusades as examples of acts of barbarism by Christianity if that's what you're looking for, particularly (in my opinion) the Fourth Crusade, which actually did lead to the destruction of the Imperial (Great) Library of Constantinople...among other atrocities, such as besieging and slaughtering their fellow Christians in the name of greed.

Neither Julius nor Aurelian (the two most widely attributed to its destruction) were Christian - just Romans.

The pendulum can also swing in the opposite direction, too - although being underweight is not considered to be as "bad" as being overweight (even though being underweight usually has more serious health effects, particularly when it comes to so-called "extreme" cases, which can more or less incapacitate you pretty quickly if you're there yourself) because you stay moderately "normal"-looking, I guess, unless it's to the point where you're actually bed-ridden or going to die/become comatose. It's a struggle for a lot of people, regardless of where you fall.

Are you really? How marvelous! What a small world we live in that I can totally chance upon someone who actually lives in my favorite part of Germany with just the mere mention of it on a mid-sized web forum (...and even if it's only my favorite part of Germany for completely silly reasons, having not even ever been to Germany, ).

RIP Brandenburg, my favorite little German state. (...although it seems to be owned by Denmark - I think? - in your campaign. )

China would beg to differ...

With the exceptions of compilation albums and anthology-type releases, CDs are hardly ever filled up to capacity, anyways...though it varies from genre to genre and from artist to artist, I suppose. Vocal and lyric-focused albums/music especially tend to stay around the 40-45 minute mark, and sometimes even get as low as 35 minutes...and basically never beyond 50. (Weird Al and They Might Be Giants come to mind as examples I personally know of off-hand, and I'm sure there are countless more in different genres.) It's just hard to fill up the full 70 minutes or so if there's constant attention paid to vocals and lyrics. For music/artists with stronger instrumental roots, on the other hand...74 minutes, here we come!

A friend and I played the first CoH together (both of us first time players). I went like 8-0 in our matches and we never played again. Good times. Since I don't think I'd have anyone to play the second one with, though, I'll have to pass (...since Chilloutman wants it).

http://506sports.com/nfl.php?yr=2015&wk=1 Useful TV maps link I use every week for anyone interested.

Oh, I assure you, we were entertained, too.

I'm afraid I must admit to a little bit of a gaffe in my previous post that Amentep unwittingly just illuminated for me: I completely forgot that the Animated Series existed, and that's what I was actually watching with a friend, not TOS...and that's what we thought was ridiculously hilarious. I'm not sure how I forgot I was watching a cartoon instead of live action, but...suffice it to say, I forgot I was watching a cartoon instead of live action. I don't think I've seen enough of the TOS to form much of an opinion about it...though I absolutely know it wasn't quite as ridiculous as TAS was. So if you think TOS is not very good, well, I suggest trying a few episodes of TAS on Netflix before you judge.