-
Posts
2511 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
42
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Everything posted by Bartimaeus
-
The advice I read online seems to generally be "if it doesn't seem noticeably wrong when you try to apply it, like being runny or too solid or flaky, then it's fine - make sure you seal it and don't store it in the sunlight", .
-
I have a big tube of Prolimatech PK-3 I've had for a few years. Not quite as good as the Kyronaut, but close enough: Did I mess up the mounting? To be determined...
-
Hmm...maybe! I'll be adding a couple of additional fans I purchased recently to the case, maybe I'll try re-mounting it then, because it is definitely thermally limited from what I tested.
-
IIRC, it does make a little difference, but not enough to discount the gap between our numbers. Mine maxes out at just ever so slightly below 14000, and I have a danged good quality air cooler too - just not enough for the 5800X, sadly. Thanks for the test - shows how much these chips really need their cooling to not throttle. I had a buddy that was using an old Hyper 212 Evo to cool his, and I could hardly believe anybody would still have one of those in this day and age, much less try to cool a 5800X with it...he was getting more like 11500-12000 with his. Yikes.
-
Attack Number One sounds pretty brutal. However, one thing I don't think you covered in your post was whether you ENJOYED the two episodes you just watched. Was it any good? Surprisingly, there are decent quality blurays of this (well, at least it's an actual bluray-quality transfer - i.e. not terrible upscales a la the Sailor Moon blurays).
-
If you run Cinebench R23 on multicore (only takes a minute or two), what score do you get after a couple of runs? Presuming you haven't overclocked or anything and are still just running stock everything - want to see how badly yours beats mine when you presumably won't have yours throttling like mine is because I'm on an air cooler. https://www.guru3d.com/files-get/download-maxon-cinebench-r23,1.html
-
At this point in my life, I would basically never completely take apart an already finished build if I don't have to. It's way too much hassle and pain to dissemble a PC - would rather just pay for another chassis than to try to rip a motherboard out of one just to put another back in, . Looks like you got some expensive RAM there - 3600 CL14, wowie! I kind of regret getting a 5800X and not waiting for a 5900X. I'm not one for liquid coolers, but the 5800Xs basically need one to really work at their full potential due to the entire CPU being on one chiplet and producing a ridiculous amount of concentrated heat - the 5900X cools better and is more power efficient even with it having 4 more cores due to being on two chiplets, . Still a great CPU, but can't help but feel like I made the wrong decision, which isn't a feeling I've really ever had before (and certainly do not like) when building a PC.
-
-
It is pretty amazing how so many completely overlook this. Endlessly Packers fans whine and complain about not getting enough help for Aaron Rodgers, that we never sign free agents like other teams do, and why don't we ever just trade away assets for known great players like other franchises do...like Julio Jones? Julio Jones is available, we'd be mad to not go after him! He might cost a first round pick or two to trade for, he may already be 32 years old, he may have been already pretty injury prone the last few years, and he'll cost tens of millions of dollars we literally don't have...but sure, let's trade for Julio Jones with the only assets we have that give us a potential way to get better. Seems smart, my fellow Packers fans! Now if you can trade for a guy who still has a couple of years on his rookie deal, that's an different entirely subject...but starting-calibre players still on their rookie deals being on the trading block is quite rare, doubly so for Pro Bowl-quality-plus players. Another problem with this is that sports, and therefore the NFL, is super results-driven, even when it makes no sense to do so. I guess it's the result of the age-old mantra that "winning is the only thing" becoming the ultimate imperative. Sometimes you make all the right trades that would theoretically say you got fantastic value, and then picked what seemed like all the right players for your teams' needs without ever reaching...and then none of those guys are on the team three years later because one of them broke their necks and had to retire, another tore their ACL and never got back to what they should've been, a few guys never were able to put it together, and the rest were just JAGs. That kind of result happens quite often for teams, and people will clown on the GM for making what were good value trades to pick players that didn't work out. Did the GM actually do a bad job, or was it just bad luck that the players didn't work out? Or heck, maybe it was coaching and fits that made it not work out... Either way, nobody ever really cares, results are the only thing that matter - kick the GM out the door and let the new one try their luck. Maybe I'm crazy, but it tends to seem like a few certain teams have pretty consistently picked lower quality character players over the last decade-plus that some other teams shy away from. I guess "winning is the only thing" hits a little harder for some teams more than others. (e): Initially forgot to finish my first paragraph - not sure what happened.
-
I wasn't - just thought I had heard before that the first dose did give *something*, just didn't know exactly what or whether Gfted did either or what any of the numbers might be. I think I can speak for all of us that have already had the second shot and had any kind of immune reaction that our immune systems would most certainly agree that the second shot is important, .
-
Completely random page with sources I didn't bother to read: https://www.healthline.com/health/why-two-doses-of-covid-vaccine#immunity-after-first-dose "What level of immunity do you have after the first vaccine? Even though the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines require two doses, you do get some immunity after you receive the first dose. Let’s examine this in a little more detail below. Pfizer-BioNTech Researchers working on the clinical trials for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine observed a vaccine effectiveness of 52 percent between the time of the first and second doses, which is a 21-day period. However, the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine may be more effective after the first dose than was previously thought. This information comes from a separate analysis from scientists in the United Kingdom. These scientists wanted to look at vaccine effectiveness 15 days or more after people had received the first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. They found that vaccine effectiveness was actually closer to 89 to 91 percent 15 days after the first dose. Moderna In a reportTrusted Source submitted to the FDA, researchers discussed vaccine effectiveness in clinical trial participants who’d only gotten one dose of the vaccine. A vaccine effectiveness of 50.8 percent was found up to 14 days after the first dose. Vaccine effectiveness was 92.1 percent beyond the first 14 days." Assuming it's either Pfizer/Moderna for him, .
-
He said he'd be getting his second shot in two weeks, so his resistance would go from 80% to 90%, strongly implying he already had his first. I don't know exactly if that's how the second changes the average resistance numbers, but he was not talking about his first shot or any sort of "natural resistance".
-
Metropolis (2001). Story and characters were pretty pants, but it was kind of an a fun little steampunk adventure that kept my interest for the most part...well, up until the end sequence, . Posters were better than the movie was, . Actually, that first poster is why I bothered to check it out at all... If I liked the movie more, I'd probably get it, especially seeing as I already have another print from this artist and this one's pretty cool too, but it seems kind of silly to shell out a lot of money to buy and frame a print for a movie I didn't even care too much for...
-
I have been hearing clowns vicariously living through their sports teams that have nothing better to do with their lives overreacting to draft picks for way too long to care at all about the draft anymore. 1. That guy was a major reach! 2. Oh, he was a GREAT value. 3. He's too undersized! 4. He's just like [HoF] player, you guys are gonna be scary! 5. He's just like [player that was a bust], LOL what a terrible pick! 6. I can't believe we're having such a great draft. 7. Oh my gosh, shoot me in the face, we're having such a horrible draft. 8. That guy had terrible attitude and discipline problems in college. 9. Our GM is such a clown. 10. In [GM] we trust! 11. This guy's a real team player and a grinder and everyone will love him. 12. Cancel the franchise. 13. We plugged the holes in our team! 14. We didn't do anything to address our needs. 15. We took the best player available. Every different thing under the sun about every situation. Some guys mysteriously fall down the draft from where the wanna-be online GMs like Mel Kiper and Mike Mayock making their big boards - sometimes it's for good reason and it's "yeah, the GMs knew what they were doing", and sometimes the players that fell make the GMs look like clowns and a team actually did get a fantastic value for eventually picking him. None of this matters right now, and so I'll never make any definitive claims about guys - only three years from now will anyone have any idea how players will have translated to the NFL or developed past what were previously weaknesses (mental, physical, personality - whatever), or alternatively shown that for all their talent, they still couldn't put it together. It's hard to muster up much of a single ounce of caring about that until then. In 2018, the Packers drafted: 1. CB Jaire Alexander in the first round that people said was a little over-drafted that turned out to be an All-Pro; people complained endlessly that we we had bigger needs and there were better players still available. 2. CB Joshua Jackson in the second round that people said should've gone in the mid-first round, so it's amazing that we got a great pair of CBs that will be the future of our secondary; has done absolutely nothing his career thus far. 3. An ILB that everyone said was a physical freak that needed time to develop that has turned out to be horrible at football in the third round. 4. An extremely physically talented WR that didn't, and doesn't know how to play WR at all and didn't last past his first year on the team in the fourth. 5. A guard that retired before he even played a snap with us in the fifth. 6. WR Marquez-Valdes Scantling that was an absolute nobody that has been a solid (albeit somewhat inconsistent) contributor the past couple of years and caught 7 TDs this past season in the sixth. And so on and so forth. All of these men are individuals, and it's impossible to tell how individuals will develop physically and mentally. I've made it a general rule to only check in to see what happened on the draft after the day is already over - it's a lot more pleasant than it used to be actually trying to watch it and see endless overreactions that don't matter. (e): Unrelated: if Rodgers actually does end up leaving the Packers, then I'll temporarily be a fan for whatever team(s) he's with for the rest of his career. He was probably the biggest component that got me into liking football, much like Favre was for many others. I just hope it's not for the Bears, Lions, Vikings, Cowboys, 49ers, Steelers, Seahawks, or Patriots. Only the 49ers look like an option that make sense right now, and they're probably the lowest on that totem pole of teams I'd least like to see him on.
-
Does anyone want to feel really uncomfortable? I mean, like SUPER uncomfortable? Like "I regret watching this show" uncomfortable? Well, here you go: I don't even remember this scene, but giggling Rini is so uncomfortable and then just goes on and on...my gosh. And then Pegasus' final line... "I know: it's magical every time." This...this implies that this is not the first time he's taken little girls into his dreams and given them wings, not by a long shot. @ArtistFormerlyKnownasKP Yeah, I never particularly minded any of those characters except for Onion (well, I used to also hate Ronaldo, but a re-watch has convinced me that he's actually funny...most of the time). Onion sucks - and not only just because his character sucks, but also because he makes everyone else not as fun, too. But anyways, do I love the episodes heavily focused on the more random characters like townies? No, not at all - they're usually the weaker or weakest parts of each season...but I still don't mind the characters themselves. In a similar vein, I really actually like Chibi-Usa...BUT BOY a lot of the episodes that are heavily focused on her in R are less fun, and that goes double...no, triple...no, a hundred times for SuperS. That's not the character, that's the episodes. And the general point about those SU episodes slowing down the show and grinding character/plot development of more important characters is almost always true, .
-
I think the problem was Usagi was being...kind of un-Usagi-like throughout the last handful of episodes? In addition to being just kind of sad and pathetic for a lot of it, why did she keep insisting on phrasing everything as if everything that was happening was her own personal loss, or that her friends literally dying was something being done to her? I thought that was bizarre while I was watching it. That was behavior I'd have expected from a much earlier version of Usagi, or maybe a SuperS version of Usagi, not end of the show, end of Sailor Stars Usagi - Sailor Stars Usagi should be out there kicking butts (metaphorically) while keeping everyone and everything together like she'd been trying to the entire season. So I think I kind of get what KaineParker means, though I don't think the comparison to specifically Shinji holds up, but that's fine - she was being something all of her own making that was kind of unpleasant and undermined the message of what she was trying to accomplish at the end there. I didn't have any clue what was happening during that entire sequence re: Galaxia, she was acting kind of bizarrely herself without clearly expressing what was going on inside and I wasn't really sure what I was supposed to be getting out of her dialogue and actions. The way I initially read her finally taking Usagi's hand was that she was somehow being forced against her will. You're almost certainly right in that that was simply not the case, but boy, I was having trouble following how I was supposed to be reading her. Also, who said you can use my reaction videos?! Guess that's what I get for making them public... But anyways, the fact that you loved SU probably further helped convince KP to watch it, so at least indirectly, you had a hand in it - particularly seeing as he'd only heard terrible, horrible, no good things about it outside of my singular self bringing it up on here.
-
What Are you Playing Now: Living the Good Life
Bartimaeus replied to Amentep's topic in Computer and Console
I'm sure I don't need to tell you this, but you're kind of confusing me: Diablo 1 (and Diablo 2) are 2D sprite-based games, not 3D model-based models. 2D graphics like sprites and textures, which have a finite amount of pixels to them, can't magically gain more detail from increasing the resolution - increasing the resolution just allows for greater magnification of the details that were already there. The detail that is already there is all there is - it's a 1998 game. So when you say this... ...you're literally asking for exactly what you just said you didn't ask for: Either that, or you're asking for a remake of the graphics altogether. Either way, I'm not understanding what you're getting after, . I preferred using 1024x768, because I don't like getting smashed by stuff off-screen and that just about covers enemies' maximum range, but 800x600 would be a good compromise too. -
What Are you Playing Now: Living the Good Life
Bartimaeus replied to Amentep's topic in Computer and Console
Hm, I'm unsure what you want re: the resolution. It's a 2D sprite-based game - the only way you could "more detailed" sprites is by completely remaking them. How do you want the game to look, exactly? "Disable Crippling Shrines=1" under [Game] in the .ini should work. -
What really matters for Green Bay is that all of the Rodgers media noise ends up being complete bologna in the coming days. Ain't gonna be no team without Rodgers for a while if what was reported is actually true (and I'm banking on it not being true, given the things being said were so out of character for everything Rodgers has said and done so far, but...smoke, fire, etc.). For specifically Stokes, I don't know anything about the college game or how players translate over to the NFL, but I do know we definitely need another good CB after it was quite literally the downfall of our team in the NFCCG when Kevin King, who's been average to below average his entire career, got chewed up and let up several TDs all by himself...and while our GM is relatively new, he's already made a couple of really good DB picks (as well as picking to sign Amos, who has been great) over the past few years, so I can't be too mad about him picking up another CB.
-
-
lmao @ that YD/Dio pose Glad you really liked it, genuinely wasn't sure if you would.
-
What Are you Playing Now: Living the Good Life
Bartimaeus replied to Amentep's topic in Computer and Console
Yeah, the GOG .mpq works fine too. Oh, yeah, you could always play on local multiplayer as well for unlocking nightmare/hell, but DevilutionX gives that option to singleplayer characters as well now. Lachdanan was a cool dude - his voice always reminded me of Tyrael's too (surprisingly not him, though), so I always liked him just for that, . Fun fact about Tyrael - he's first mentioned in Hellfire, of all places: "And in the year of the golden light, it was so decreed that a great cathedral be raised. The cornerstone of this holy place was to be carved from the translucent stone Antyrael, named for the angel who shared his power with the Horadrim. [...]" -
What Are you Playing Now: Living the Good Life
Bartimaeus replied to Amentep's topic in Computer and Console
Correct. Also, for the devs to stay legal, the one thing you need to do to finish "installing" it is to drop and drag the "DIABDAT.MPQ" file from a Diablo installation into the DevilutionX folder. That is one annoyance I run into every time I update it - have to remember to get my DIABDAT.MPQ from the previous folder before deleting it. If you need help with that/don't feel like finding your CDs or whatever, just send me a quick PM. One thing I particularly like about Diablo 1 compared to most ARPGs is that how short and self-contained it is. You can play the game for 5 hours, complete it, and feel satisfied with that. ...Although now with DevilutionX, you can actually play and continue singleplayer games on Nightmare and Hell like old multiplayer Battle.Net characters used to be able to do, so you can continue with that if you really want to. Don't need to farm for a trillion years, don't need to engage with some bullcrap economy...the game was 95% designed as just a simple, consistent singleplayer experience, and I appreciate that a lot. (e): My one complaint with the game used to be that it was just a bit too slow-paced, but DevilutionX solved that too by allowing you to adjust the speed of your game on the fly if you want a faster-paced game. -
Correct me if I'm wrong, @Guard Dog, but I think it's two competing, conflicting thoughts and feelings: 1. I really hate and am sick and tired of these scumbags, and I wish they were dead. 2. But if I was actually in charge of deciding whether they lived or died, obviously I wouldn't kill them - there's a reason we have the legal system we do, as flawed and frustrating as it can be. Pretty sure that's more or less it. Every time he's posting some off-the-cuff feeling about how they all deserve to hang together, it's the first feeling manifesting all by itself; when you get the inevitable response about how he doesn't actually want that, it's the second pulling him back to a more measured and realistic take. You're gonna keep getting this kind of interaction over and over and over because he, and many more people like him (including others I personally know and hence why I feel equipped to explain what's happening here), is very conflicted about how he feels and he's not considering every single feeling, thought, bias, or prejudice equally at all times of the day, thus leading to this same interaction repeatedly...and it's probably not going to change any time soon.