thepixiesrock

Sweeny Todd soundtrack

That last post was just to bust Hades's chops. I think I've made my case.

You seem to feel pretty strongly about this issue Hades. Almost, fanatical. I don't know about that.

Right, those people don't teach children now, and I wouldn't expect that to change.

It's like in high school where when we were studying origins of life, there were three main models we were introduced to, Primordial Soup Model Extra-terrestrial And then one other one that was like intelligent design, I'm not sure if it was called that though We only went into depth on the first one, but they still mentioned the others because they are still out there. I mean, they still mention perpetual motion even though they pretty much laugh it off as impossible.

The water that goes off the bottom right corner doesn't end up on the other side of the map.

To get people off their backs.

Pixies - Rock a My Soul

I think you should send your greivence as a PM to all of the developers that work at Obsidian regardless of what games they are/have worked on. You will not be not heard!

I'm playing through NWN2 as an Assimar Socerer/Eldrich Knight. I don't know if choosing the prestige class was a good or bad idea, but I wanted to make a spell casting character that didn't rely soley on casting spells.

I don't know, I don't think it's a huge deal for it to be taught in science classes, as long as they put it in context as being a faith based theory.

I wish there was a physical embodyment of the wind that I could just punch right in the face.

I woke up this morning. I'll keep you posted.

Word. It seemed like we stopped having it for a while, and then recently it's like every thread that you could have the discussion in.

Putting all my skill points into luck!

Does what other people believe really have such a huge impact on your (everyone's) lives?

Maybe we just all had to be there or something? It just seems to me that the only way this kind of thing could super funny is to one of those people that thinks they're better and smarter than everyone else, and just go through everyday looking for people that disagree with you on something so that they can get a chance to prove how "smart" they are.

So what are we even arguing now?

I'm wearing a french maid outfit with a little bit of frilly lace at the ends, and some white nylon stockings. I enter the study and begin to dust the mantle of the fire place. With a playful sigh I drop the duster. "Ooops. Silly me!" I say as I bend over to pick it up, giving a peak at my black satin panties.

But those acts are still not inherently evil, nor would they be if everyone on earth thought they were. If everyone on earth thought something was evil, that wold make it evil, relatively. Unless you are saying it's absolutely not evil. "Good" and "evil" are simply labels that are put on things we, either as an individual or a society, like and, respectively, disagree with - and thus something can never be proven to be absolutely moral or amoral. I might consider something immoral that the next generation accepts as a standard practise, while they, in turn, could abhor things that I support. You cannot make the claim that there are moral absolutes, even if they are universally applied, as the next generation might have a need to disregard the ancient taboos and adopt a forbidden practice - something that would disprove the absolute "evil" nature of the act. Maybe Walsingham is correct, and this entire discussion is pointless, but I do not agree. I'm not saying that what we define as good or evil can't change. I was saying that as long as every single person on earth or in one society thought something was evil, then it would be evil in the confines of that earth/society. As long as you set a context, anything can be absolute, and as long as we don't set a context, then everything can be relative. This applies to everything and not just morality. So I can say there is a moral absolute if there is a context for it to be put in.

Spot on Wals. Spot on.

But those acts are still not inherently evil, nor would they be if everyone on earth thought they were. If everyone on earth thought something was evil, that wold make it evil, relatively. Unless you are saying it's absolutely not evil. I think labels of good and evil are a nessesity for society.

But we were going to save our money for GTA4. What happened?

Hahahahaahahahaahahaha

Hades made it seem like he was saying Mass Effect couldn't have been any better because he thought it was perfect. It isn't wrong to assume he meant that, and knowing Hades, it's completely probable that anyone would think that. The thing is, he didn't say that, he just said he didn't think it could be any better, and left it at that. It left him room later to be able to explain himself more (read: make up something on the spot to get out of a contradiction he may find himself in at one point, because he always does). Whether he did it intentionally, or by some stroke of idiot savant-esque luck, we'll never know.