Blank

No. I do have interest, however, I would be satisfied with only part of the action. All of the action would require some computer upgrades for me, so if it was ported to the 360 it would be more convenient. I guess I am the only one who thinks this though... ?

LoneWolf, that is how I feel for NWN2, except I replace "PC" with "Xbox360".

So, not to name names *cough* ShadowPaladin V1.0 *cough*, but I know some of you here have the Xbox 360 and are disappointed that some seemingly popular Xbox games are just not backward compatible. Well, I have links that will solve all of your problems. I used this one: Xbox.com download But I suppose this works too: Microsoft Download site Simply download and burn onto a CD, then insert the CD into your 360 and it starts its own interface. I just did it. Twas simple. The hard part was my 56k download time, but even that worked out just fine. Anyway, I hope this helps.

I think it depends on which emulator was downloaded onto the hard drive at the time your 360 was shipped. So the first 360's maybe only had one or two xbox games, and after a while the list adds up and more and more game emulators come with the 360 from factory. I am pretty sure you can download the info though For example, I remember people talking about the Halo 1 and 2 emulators needing to be downloaded if your system didn't have them yet.... Anyway, I was wondering if my system came with it or not. I know ShadowPaladin got his a little earlier than I did mine, but

Not really otherwise every game with a protagonist would have a chosen one by default. Ha, that was my point. I agree with you... I sure hope NWN2 will be TEH BESTEST!

But doesn't being alive when others are not define you as chosen? JE sounds good, if we judged games as good if they don't include the "chosen" factor.

Well, think of it as a metagamer for a second. Playing as the chosen one is better because it is more exciting than not playing as the chosen one... I think? How about becoming the chosen one after you do some junk and get good at junk? I thought i read some review about the early NWN2 and how it was supposed to start you out as unimportant? Did i read about a different game? or did they change that? BTW, I would choose her too :ph34r:

Speaking of JE, does anybody know if it works on the 360? I wanted to pick it up used if so.

YEAH!? WELL I BET YOUR SPELLING TEACHER WOULD BE DISAPPOINTED* IN YOU!

Your reference to a general truth disturbed him so much that he lashed out by saying it was sexist.

C'mon Gabs, 56k isn't that bad. I mean, it only took 30 seconds for it to load the text for me, and by the time i got down to the pictures they were all loaded.

In PnP you missed a campaign Eldar set up. TOMBS was meh while you were gone. In C&C you missed Gromnir being adamant about the general decline of RPGs' lengths nowadays. The thread explodes with useless argument. Were you to check the thread in the morning, it would be at 10 pages, and in the afternoon, it would be at about 25 pages. I helped contribute to the first thread's end with not-so-subtly insterted spam, but Grom started another. So basically, you missed nothing.

It would work for me if we did it on Thursday. Basically, that is my day off, so any time is good.

I would've made it last time had I loaded the junk earlier. But now it is all loaded (it took 2 hrs.). If we do it at the same time, i can make it.

I cheat as in O's. As in CHEETOS!!@!@!@!@ HAHAHAHAHAH!1111!!!! R00FLES!

NO WAI!!!!

O RLY?

I just needed to take a moment and laugh at what this thread has become.

That rule is simply an observation of the actions of notable* rulers in history. How do we know that the person wasn't corrupt before they received power? Post hoc reasoning Meta? I expected more from you... *(these corrupted rulers are notable because they received power and used it in a bad way, but those rulers that aren't notable are the ones who received power and didn't do much with it. I am wondering what would happen if we knew of all the rulers in history and compiled them into lists of: corrupted and uncorrupted. People in the middle would be judged by what their actions were for the most part, corrupted or uncorrupted.)

True, but in the book, It is true that there will always be some breakaways, but the leaders in the book were able to almost completely unite their respective nations.

Card's "Bean" series of books include a hegemon, Ender's brother Peter, that is successful. He creates a world-democracy, and when that is accomplished, he steps down, and no further hegemon are needed.

Nah, Nihilis is dead. To have him come back would be unrealistic to me. He was a hole in the force, destroyed by another hole, the Exile. But whatever, K3 isn't even announced yet. I'll be an old geezer by the time it comes out... if it comes out. *insert more cynical comments*

Ha, you realize that you sound as if you've never read the book, right? Bean didn't have a religion, and if he did, it would've probably been Catholicism, since Sister Carlotta was a mother to him when he was young, and although he didn't care about it then, he eventually appreciated what she did for him when he got older. On a side-note, although Orson is Mormon, I rarely saw him try to slide his religion into his books. All I saw was that Ender's mother was Mormon. However, in Speaker for the Dead, the book is heavy with Catholic characters. Just because Orson is Mormon, don't mean he automatically puts his religion in le books. He's an author, not an evangelist. Some can do both at the same time, but he aint seemin to be doin that, he's just a good author from what I can tell.