Jump to content

Calax

Members
  • Posts

    8080
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by Calax

  1. Here's to Red.
  2. the skill... I don't know, maybe you get somthing deifferent from a steal rather than a kill.
  3. I think Finovar died again.
  4. so you simply give the mobs somthing that the people can steal and not allow stealing against players.
  5. or he's like Lobo, you chop him in half there's two of him.
  6. well you could kill Mission Zal and Jolee if you wanted. And while Carth was included in that they had to keep the part small so they could interchange it with a generic NPC if he went dark.
  7. play his Pure Paazak then. Problem solved. No offence to Akari but I've never had the patience to play paazak or Race for any amount of time.
  8. Paladins, all things being equal (ie at level 60) get demolished because they can't do any damage worth note. On the raids I've been on the paladins hang back and heal their allies for that very reason. At one point in the molten core, the guild I play with (I don't have an account, I use friends) got all but wiped at Lucifron, then they just had the paladins rush it with some priestly help, needless to say the paladins got turned into several piles of nothingness after doing a grand total of 1% of his life. I admit I was a little bit hard on Rogues but I don't think that they should be the melee damage doers. Warriors should be the paragon of melee. this isn't to say that other classes shouldn't be competant with melee it's just that the fact that rogues and hunters are seperate classes is questionable. Rogues are usually the ones who stand behind the warrior and punt a crossbow into sombodys back. Most rogues that you find in fiction and fantasy are the type to use bows before they use blades because they are, at the most basic level, playing to win, and that will generally cause the rogue to use "cheap shots". there is a difference but there are rogues who when both classes are maxed (Warriors and Rogues) the Rogues can have more health and can do more damage, if they had plate they would be able to be a better tankers than the warriors. You say I'm asking for Warcraft 4. I am, because with WoW people won't want the world to either vanish or change to the point that their stuff will become useless. And because if they did want to have a story between 3 and 4 they would have to have the leaders try to act it out in the WoW. otherwise some MMO players will yell that this screws them over, they would loose players, and ultimatly either one game or the other would be ruined because they have to dovetail them to work with eachother, meaning that they either have to have an enormus patch, or the game itself would have to have a design change to represent the different world that the players are in.
  9. It's really funny when they pop one off at you and you have a maxed out Aggresive Defense Drone. They blow not only themselves up, but everyone near them too.
  10. have you ever seen a pack of paladins take on a Boss in an instance and win? No, they wouldn't even get that far because they can't do enough damage. Sure they can be powerful, but unless you want to hang around for six hours I would think that you would want backup on a raid. Also most of their equipment isn't meant for fighting, it's meant to put them firmly in the "surviving healers" catagory.
  11. he can send that to you in email/picture form...
  12. this is bad, very very bad that I have to use this again It has become applicable
  13. [DeusExfanboyishness] But they arn't the uber Hyper Dooper people who work for unatco[/DeusExfanboyishness]
  14. The plot twist was like Aeris dying, Everbody knows about it even if they haven't even heard of the game..
  15. I doubt sombody with more technology in them than I have in front of me could be knocked out by a gazillion paralysis darts or stun charges.
  16. no the mod (who I insulted horribly by spelling his name wrong) has popped open the game and spilled it's guts all over his desktop looking through the entire contents and cataloged everything. He also posted it in an old old thread..... (mostly the cut content) http://forums.obsidianent.com/index.php?showtopic=32956
  17. ook
  18. Surely killing is killing, whether using a killphrase or not? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I think it was Spector who said you don't have to actually FIGHT anyone, not necessairly kill. And notice I initially said fight anyway?
  19. Leisure Suit Larry for teh win! (It was out in what? 1985?)
  20. If you play Deus correctly you don't have to FIGHT a single character. you still have to use killphrases. Dum ditty dum ditty dummmmmm.
  21. Differing styles different music. They be their own maestros on their own scales. Hows' that you Berk.
  22. or they just misenterprited the prophesy (there were always two Jedi and Two sith.... Luke brought balance by fufilling the 2nd jedi slot.)
  23. To Dawuss http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0004581/
×
×
  • Create New...