Serdan

As a philosopher you should know how to express yourself clearly and, just as importantly, concisely. My eyes glazed over when I got to the wall of text at the end.

Overall I liked your post. I just have to note that all activists use social media. They'd be idiots not to. The notion that the internet is somehow distinct from all other aspects of our lives and doesn't really matter is absurd. It is without contest the best way to reach a large audience.

What Junta said.

OMG the first time I oopsied into that part of the bridge district and also Kangraax ... Amazing party wipes. Yup. You could also go visit Firkraag first thing. ^^ So many baddies that would insta-wipe you unless you were prepared. EDIT: And even then some would still be like lolnope and eat your frontline... and then your backline. ^^

Pretty much. It forces you to actually optimise and strategerise.

Optional super powerful baddies are always great fun! I remember that time I stumbled into the pitch black doorway in the bridge district. Good times! More seriously: That encounter can be beaten, but it requires you to actually understand the game mechanics. E.g. have you figured out what its lowest defense is?

What it boils down to guys, is Serdan is mad straight guys won't bang him. Your ineffectual attempts at mockery amuse me. Keep it up. And your selective crusading amuses me. Serdans panties get knotted up over a harmless backer limerick, while kids are starving and dying of sickness. Because what really matters is that straight men find gay men who identify as female attractive. Not. Yes yes. Dear muslima and all that. Keep going, I've almost got my bingo card filled out. Nah I made my point. You continue to look petty and foolish, and you do nothing for the LGBT cause except make their members look petty and foolish. Thank you, and good night. Your point being that I'm a mad gay man who is butthurt because Obs removed a limerick that was offensive to trans* people which I somehow turned into a crusade instead of helping sick children? Very good point! I'll have to remember that.

Would the bigots be on their crusade if the limerick had been explicitly racist? Silly question, I know. Of course they would. You're the only bigot here. No no, that won't do. You should ask Faustian for some pointers.

What it boils down to guys, is Serdan is mad straight guys won't bang him. Your ineffectual attempts at mockery amuse me. Keep it up. And your selective crusading amuses me. Serdans panties get knotted up over a harmless backer limerick, while kids are starving and dying of sickness. Because what really matters is that straight men find gay men who identify as female attractive. Not. Yes yes. Dear muslima and all that. Keep going, I've almost got my bingo card filled out.

What it boils down to guys, is Serdan is mad straight guys won't bang him. Your ineffectual attempts at mockery amuse me. Keep it up. EDIT: You can do better than that though. Throw in some misogyny too!

Yes, I am so very butthurt because Obs did exactly what I wanted them to do... Wait, what? This has gone beyond ridiculous, but keep making those asinine assumptions. It's very entertaining.

Would the bigots be on their crusade if the limerick had been explicitly racist? Silly question, I know. Of course they would.

Let's try again: What is it you think I should explain about that video?

It didn't show up for me in Firefox, but IE worked fine.

Depends on the engagement limit of that enemy. The same is true of your own peeps. EDIT: You can move a companion away if the enemy has the Flanked debuff. I'll have to test it to see exactly how this works, but it's something to keep in mind.

I have no idea what you think I need to explain about that.

I'm sorry for calling you a bigot. Referring to homosexuals, or intimacy between homosexuals, as unnatural perpetuates bigotry (which does not necessarily mean that the one doing it is a bigot). If you feel so strongly about it maybe... you should not do that. I don't know where you live, but you are likely aware that homosexuals are persecuted in many parts of the world. In some nations they are in danger of being executed, simply for being who they are. Those who advocate for the marginalisation and murder of homosexuals use the same kind of language as you. Do you see the problem? Do you understand why someone might react strongly to that? So you're just trolling. Gotcha.

Take your patronising bs and shove it. If the bigots hadn't shown up in force I would never have touched any social issues, but I guess you think bigotry should pass without remark.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia "Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder" Paedophiles are not at fault for their condition and deserve to be treated fairly. As a group they are at very high risk of suicide due to their difficulty with having a functional sex-life and in extreme cases it is an outright impossibility. On top of that they are vilified by society as a whole. Whatever his morals, Darji is completely right when he points out that many otherwise progressive people will fail on this issue. To be clear: You will never see me defend child-abusers. If you are unable to distinguish between the condition of being attracted to children and the act of abusing children (something that does not require you to be a paedophile) then that is your problem, not mine. I will defend and show compassion for any who suffer through no fault of their own, whatever the cause of that suffering, and let the condemnations of ignorant fools be damned.

I'm not the one perpetuating bigotry. Nature has intentions now? Did nature intent for humans to use the internet? You'd better go live in a cave or on a deserted island, if nature's intentions mean so much to you. So you never use protection and you don't want your partner to use birth control? Lovely. You are trying to force me to shut up! Fascist! But seriously, does your ignorance know no bounds?

I love Edér's trolling of Aloth. ^^

It is not unnatural in any sense of the word. A lot of people care. People who call homosexuals unnatural and actively try to abridge the rights of homosexuals. Are you going to acknowledge this? Communism? What?

Seconded!!!! Low priority though

manageri already hinted at it, but in case you're not aware: The yellow portion of the AoE overlay is always foe-only. As for mind lance, I just make sure to have a space between my tanks.

I was waiting for you to engage in such useless pedantry. What you fail to comprehend is that this isn't just some academic discussion or a few people being "hypersensitive". Real people are being harmed by bigotry, so when I see someone perpetuate such bigotry I will call them out on it. Your insistence that doing so is somehow wrong unless I can prove with absolute certainty that they actually engage in bigotry is utter bs. As I have already stated, my prior for Sriker being genuine can be found somewhere in the region of the asthenosphere. If Striker convinced me otherwise I would apologize, but I'm not holding my breath. a lot of people on the social justice side do this with fetishes they do not tolerate. Like pedophilia. Something you can not do anything about it as well. Its your sexual orientation and it should not be a crime unless people get hurt by it. Thats the biggest example If I see someone do that I'll call them a bigot too, so that's not much of a counterexample. Do you think my reaction was unreasonable? If so, why? According to my experience it is a very strong predictor of bigotry when someone refers to people as unnatural. Do you have any meaningful answers to this? How convenient. Do you deny that calling homosexuals, or intimacy between homosexuals, unnatural is rhetoric used by people who are actively engaged in abridging the rights of homosexuals?