Lucius

I reserve the right to tell anyone who shows intolerance or ignorance to shut it, regardless of social status, race, or religion. However, you don't say shut it to the fundamentalist who posted above that he 'disagrees' with homosexuality, how very hypocritical of you, mr. World Savior. PS. Mothman, you of all people ought to learn when not to open your mouth, you invited a flame, although you were expecting it to come from Meta, if you'd just kept your biblical self glorification to yourself, then nothing would have happened.

Indeed... towards certain groups of people. :ph34r: <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You shut it. Christians come in all different stripes of beliefs and tolerance. Thanks for the correction Lancer. I got it off of a Billboard for Coke, and the literal translation amuses me. (w00t) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You don't know the nature of our recent discussions on the board, so don't f ucking tell me to shut it. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yes, yes I do. In fact, it wouldn't have even took me looking over the threads for the past few days to know you were referring to intolerance towards homosexuals. Whenever someone says that at this point in time, they're referring to lack of tolerance towards homosexuals. I stand by what I said, shut it. Thanks Mus. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> And I stand by what I said, to both of you for that matter, I don't care if you saved the goddamn world while in Mexico, you don't f ucking tell me to shut it.

Speaking of which, you should see what Hasselhoff has done with the place.

Indeed... towards certain groups of people. :ph34r: <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You shut it. Christians come in all different stripes of beliefs and tolerance. Thanks for the correction Lancer. I got it off of a Billboard for Coke, and the literal translation amuses me. (w00t) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You don't know the nature of our recent discussions on the board, so don't f ucking tell me to shut it.

Well, you see, Greenland had always been part of Norway, and Norway was under Danish rule since the Danish Queen united all of Scandinavia around 1400, conveniently under Danish rule of course. Sweden broke off not long after, but Norway and all her possessions remained. When we then ended up on the losing side by allying with Napoleon some 400 years later, Sweden jumped in and tought it be funny to take Norway from us (bastards), however, we kept Greenland and the Faeroe Islands. So there. :D Edit: Either that, or Deraldins version, I'm just not sure. :ph34r:

Don't give them any bright ideas.

That's it! It belongs to the penguins! Problem solved. We can just organise a democratic referendum and the penguins can vote... Hang on a second. Penguins? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I'd like to see penguins vote, that'll be kinda cute. :D Edit: Polar bears, penguins, whatever. Both are somewhat cuddly. ^_^ <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I don't know about you, but I'd rather be attacked by a mob of penguins than ONE Polar BEAR. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> No huggy for the Polar Bears then? :">

I wouldn't be surprised if Canada has a smaller military than Denmark actually. With all the money that has been cut from our military we've been using green camo in deserts! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You don't have a desert theme for the army, at all then? I guess that could be a good thing, just don't get involved in any future Bush led invasions, I'm pretty sure we won't. (or so I hope ^_^) By the way, this is danish desert camo with our C7 rifle, which is made in Canada of all place.

I agree, a gross example of overkill here, and quite the display of arrogance, really. As in "We could just use the machinegun, but we're gonna fire this 120mm HEAT shell and laugh about it instead"

Heh, probably. But there won't be much fun for them up in those regions, their navy vessels lacks icebreakers, hence the reason for their fustration about not being able to properly patrol the northern areas.

That's it! It belongs to the penguins! Problem solved. We can just organise a democratic referendum and the penguins can vote... Hang on a second. Penguins? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I'd like to see penguins vote, that'll be kinda cute. :D Edit: Polar bears, penguins, whatever. Both are somewhat cuddly. ^_^

didn't you try that about 500 years ago? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Norway was under the Danish crown back then, so they've probably tried a few times to take it, considering all the wars we've been through. As for your previous post Meta...

I did, only I had somehow missed getting the 'l' in 'html' when I did it. It does work, btw. It's all about the prospects of resources baby, suddenly cold rock with nothing but penquins becomes extremely important.

Actually, Kirottu, I screwed up twice. It should work now, lol. I make too many typos for my own good. :">

Well, actually the interest in the area is about the prospects of finding Oil there when global warming kicks in, did you know that already Meta? Or are you reading my mind?

Indeed... towards certain groups of people. :ph34r:

It's an old border disbute concerning a cold dead rock called Hans Island. (Hans being a Danish boys name) - Fixed! So, if we decide to fight it out, what do you reckon it would resemble? Two old men in wheelchairs, incapacitated men shouting at eachother, or perhaps girly bicycle riders in a fist fight? We ought to whoop Canadas ass... most likely in a drinking competition. Fixed poor URL. :">

You need to cry louder if you want him summoned completely, until then all I can give you is this: Kaftan, did you have a hand in the creation of that T-shirt? Hmmmm?

Free online translations? (Although I should warn you that Hilde tends to come up with some interesting variations in spelling, so if you don't have a latin-english dictionary to hand, you may still not get a good translation ...) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> That there site reeks of crappy translations dude, besides, it's just common curtesy, no? I don't speak my own language to people who can't understand it when in real life. But that discussion is over and done with, we both did it and it was silly.

Just thought I'd add a picture of Jeremy Irons, a true character actor whom I admire. ^_^

Cool tattoos dude. :cool:

Well I can see no further use in arguing about this, as Meta said, I hate arguing with Christians. No offence. Edit: This wasn't a response to you, Magena, just so you know.

That's exactly right, you aren't meant for any of those things, you're an animal, albeit a smart one, our species wasn't put here by some divine intervention in the form of just two people, you know.

It's not 'natural' to sit here and type on an internet forum, either, or driving a car at 120 km/s, when we ought to be outside hunting for food. There's a lot of stuff that isn't 'natural' when you define nature in the way you do, which is "what we humans were created to do".

Well, I misinterpreted your question. Granted, the child is not always unwilling, (although the vast majority is) I've read about a 12 year old girl who routinely had sex with older men (before she was tragically killed) The point I'm making is if something supposedly unnatural is okay, where do you draw the line? How do you know what's okay and what's not? You can't always say love justifies everything, because Michael Jackson apparently loved those young boys yet it would still be considered unacceptable, regardless if they were willing or not. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Oh, the line is quite easy. Consent. If two or more people consent to performing an activity, then that is no one's business but their own. Children are not capable of making an informed decision with regard to sexual activity, so they cannot consent to it. Therefore any sexual activity performed with them is a form of rape. I don't see the slippery slope. Look at something else Children can't do. Voting for instance. Where do you draw the line? How do you know who should be allowed to vote? I mean, if you start letting the poor or the women vote, how do you know that letting kids vote is a bad idea? Yet which countries that accepted universal sufferage ended up letting the kids vote? Historically, we seem to have had no trouble at all defining children as special cases under the law. They have different protections and diferent rights. The same holds true here for sexual consent. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Well said.