ktchong

Did anyone else think Rey's past memory had been tampered with? It's heavily implied in her flashback sequence.

STAR WARS: THE FORCE AWAKEN!!!

I am somewhat disappointed by this Winter Sale.

Seems like every white person is offended while every Asian/black/Mexican guy thinks it is funny as hell: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-cekCgenAg

Enya has just released a new album after seven years of hiatus.

I do not hate feminists. I am annoyed by them - and on particular issues.

I am an atheist. So are almost everyone in the videos I posted here, i.e., Richard Dawkins, Bill Maher, Dusty, Jacklyn Glenn, i.e., they are well-known atheists and liberals, and big critics of Islam who have recently called out and distanced themselves from "Regressive Leftists". Joe Rogan is an independent politically, (he supported Ron Paul in the past, but he currently supports Bernie Sanders,) but also an atheist. He is a social liberal but libertarian on economic and political issues. He is an, atheist. Paul Joseph Watson (the guy with the British accent) is a libertarian and, again, an atheist. He is the only conservative in my videos - but he is a libertarian (hence, a conservative) but NOT a Christian. My problem with Regressive Leftists and Islam is that, when a liberal criticizes Christianity, (and liberals often do), other regressive leftists do not try to censor or ostracize him/her. In fact, the regressive liberals will cheer him/her on. On the other hand, whenever a liberal criticizes Islam, the regressives will do everything in their power to silence, shame and destroy him/her. This has gone for too long for in Europe, and this political correctness has crept into American sociopolitical landscape in the past decade or so. It has to be stopped before America regressed and devolved into the situation like in Europe, where Muslims are running amok. I am just glad that many liberals are now fighting back instead of being rolled over like liberals did in Europe. There is a civil war brewing among liberals over Islam, over the very soul of liberalism in America. The very nature of Islam is the antithesis of the core of liberalism in so many ways. Liberals should not betray and sacrifice our core principles just to appease Muslims, to promote the agenda of "multiculturalism". Those Regressive Leftists or Regressive Liberals, who want to censor speech and abridge freedom to defer to Islam, are traitors to the liberal principles. Here in the West, liberals should not become more Islamic; muslims should become more liberal - yet Regressive Leftists are turning it upside-down.

These articles do not explain how these stories constitute the development of "4th" or "5th" waves and only seem to use these titles in the headline. I strongly suspect you're just using terms with no understanding of the meaning. Honestly I could care less about feminism and what waves they are. I just know that every time I pointed out to a feminist that feminists are a problem and want to censor speech, she would reply, "oh it's not me or all feminists... it's the 4th and 5th waves." Do I care? Not really. It is really the majority of the vocal feminists, along with Islam apologists, who are the problem and the main components of the "Regressive Left". But let's get back to the Regressive Left as it relates to Islam: Again, let me re-emphasize: the concept of the "moderate" is very different for Muslims. When a Muslim self-identifies as "moderate", his/her definition of "moderate" is not what you think it is: Here is the video of the Muslim "Peace" Conference in Oslo, Norway: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bV710c1dgpU - find out for yourselves what the "peaceful" Muslims' definition of "moderate" is. Now, no one else put those words in their mouths or force them to raise their hands. The problem is... those Muslims do not see themselves as extremists. They think of themselves as "moderate" or "normal" Muslims. ALL OF THEM IN THAT CONFERENCE ROOM OF "PEACE". And the "Regressive Leftists" want to sacrifice liberal values to defer to those people in the name of "diversity", "tolerance" and "multiculturalism". I notice there is a Muslim member in here from Malaysia who has been defending Islam and spilling deceptions in this thread. Just as a reminder: 86 percent of Muslims in Malaysia support making Sharia laws the laws of the land, (at 2:32 in the first video.) Ask her if she is among the "86 percent" who want Sharia law to become the law of the land and be enforced onto the Chinese and Indian non-Muslims in Malaysia. Ask her if she agrees men and women should "sit separate". Ask her if she agrees the punishments as prescribed in the Quran and Sunnah, whether it is death, whether it is stoning for adulterers, whatever it is, if it is from allah and his messenger, that is the best punishment ever possible for humankind, and that is what we should apply in the world. Ask her. And then ask her if she thinks of herself as a radical extremists. My guess is, she will be evasive and avoid answering the questions. P.S. That member is Qistina. More P.S. My point is, as liberals, we have to defend our principles against Islam whose so many ideas are the antitheses of liberal ideals. Liberal principles and Islamic principles cannot co-exist. Right now, Regressive Leftists are betraying and sacrificing liberal principles to appease Muslims. That has to stop. I am just glad that liberals are finally waking up and standing up against the regression.

"There's also no such thing as 4th and 5th waves" The Guardian: The fourth wave of feminism: meet the rebel women aka "Feminazi" The Guardian via Raw Story: Teen spirit: Meet the fifth-wave feminists aka "Tumblr Feminism" Every wave has become more idiocratic and SJW than the last. FYI, The Guardian is the archetype of Regressive Leftist press that pushes the SJW agenda, so their reports are biased.

More on the Regressive Left aka "SJW" aka Social Justice Warriors, and how it relates to contemporary radical feminism (i.e., 4th and 5th waves): P.S. Joe Rogan is not a liberal - he is an independent. i.e., he used to support Ron Paul, now he is supporting Bernie Sanders.

Actually, liberals (which I used to consider myself as one) are starting to have a backlash against "regressive liberals" who are Islam apologists - the "liberals" who would sacrifice and compromise liberal principles to defer to Islam:

Broken Age was delivered and got good reviews, right? So what did he do with Broken Age that made people say they would not trust him with their money?

The idiot married a woman in hijab. Likely only found out she was butt fugly in the bedroom, so decided to end it all.

I must have missed something... I just found out that Tim Schafer is one of the most hated people in the gaming industry. Seems like a lot of people are saying they ain't giving a dime to that douchebag.

Here is the first teaser trailer:

I knew it! http://www.outerplaces.com/science-fiction/item/10587-tell-tale-games-announces-new-batman-video-game A month ago, I took a random video game survey. It asked me a bunch of questions about TellTale games and Batman. It was a looong survey, (but I got paid for it.) First it asked me about how I felt about all the TellTale games. Then it asked me about what kind of Batman game I would like to play, and which main villain I would like to see in the game. And I thought, whoa, TellTale must be planning to make a Batman game... and ta-da!

FYI, BioWare is the biggest SJW game developer around... except they more or less supported SOPA (as their parent company EA does.) Which are two of the reasons I have stopped buying BioWare game since 2007(?) That last game I bought from BioWare was the first Mass Effect on Xbox 360, (which I did not complete because the Xbox burned out.) There are about six or seven reasons why I have refused to buy anything from BioWare since then.

The problem here is the so-called "regressive leftists" in America are using this shooting as an opportunity to call for gun control. On the other hand, they refuse to even acknowledge that shooters were Muslims, (given that regressive leftists are also Islam apologists.) So they are being opportunistic and using this opportunity to attack one thing (guns, which they do not like) while ignore the other (Muslims and Islam, which they love to coddle.) That is just pure biased.

The names of the suspects shot dead by police are: Syed Rizwan Farook Tashfeen Malik In a Daily News interview, Syed Farook's (estranged) father said of his son: “He was very religious. He would go to work, come back, go to pray, come back. He’s Muslim.” According to an Associated Press report: co-workder Patrick Baccari said Farook traveled to Saudi Arabia early this year and returned with a wife, (i.e., Malik,) and later grew a beard, (i.e., a sign of becoming a devout Muslim.) The AP report, like 99.99 percent of news reports out there, does not even mention that he is a Muslim. The San Bernardo shooting was no different from the Paris shooting: three organized, planned, well-armed radical Muslims wearing bulletproof vest. Both shootings had three shooters. France has gun control, which did not prevent the Paris shooting. So arguing for gun control in this case is pointless - it would not have prevented this particular shooting.

Wait for the inevitable DLC and until all of the major bugs have been patched. I'd wait until all of the DLC and patches are released, and get the "Game of the Year" or "Complete" edition. It's also a time consideration: I just do not have the time to keep going back to a game and keep replaying it every time a new DLC comes out. A lot of DLC add contents at the beginning or in the middle of the adventures, instead of letting you continue to developer your character and the story AFTER the main quest is completed. Which means, unless you want to waste your time, go back to a game and restart from the beginning, DLC is just a waste of time for people who have already completed the main game. I have hundreds of games on backlog on Steam and GOG. I want to go through the backlog. I just do not want to go back to a game that I've already completed because of new DLC. (I am also a "completionist". I want to play a game with all the DLC included. It bothers me when I play a game but miss out on the DLC. Seriously, game developers should add DLC that extends the story after the main quest instead of dropping new contents at the beginning/in the middle of the game. Right now, I'm just gonna assume all DLC adds content at the beginning/in the middle because that's how the majority of them are anyway.)

And after playing other RPGs, I'm starting to think Obsidian patented 'being a competent writer for an RPG game'. .... CD Projekt Red was excellent in The Witcher 2 and 3. I'd personally rank CDPR as currently being the best in business right now, above Bethesda, BioWare, and Obsidian. Next year's Game of the Year and/or RPG of the Year awards will likely include these two finalists: The Witcher 3 and Fallout 4. Based on what I've been reading and seeing on YouTube, (and you can google it and search for the videos yourself,) the overwhelming majority who compared those two titles think The Witcher 3 is the better game and the better RPG.

I have not played Fallout 4 and won't play it until all of its inevitable DLC are released. However, I've been watching Let's Play Fallout 4 videos on YouTube. IMO, the character facial models and animations in the first Mass Effect, a game that came out eight years ago, are on par or even better than those in Fallout 4. Bethesda has a lot of catching up to do in the facial animation technology. Then again, the facial models and animations in Mass Effect have always been so far advanced than GTA, Obsidian games, just about all other RPG and action adventures, and even BioWare's own Dragon Age series. The latest Dragon Age, Inquisition, has only come close to the Mass Effect series. (The first two Dragon Age games were awful in terms of facial modeling and animations.) The Witcher 3 comes close or is on par; however, players do not design their characters' faces in The Witcher 3. Mass Effect is so far ahead of competitions in terms of character facial models and animations - at least eight years ahead, which is quite amazing.

This movie has not come out, but it has been under the radar. This new clip - and its realistic portrait of the DMV - from the movie is hilarious: Definitely will see it.

Fast forward to 2:50: At 2:50 in the video: a journalist pointed out the hypocrisy to a U.S. State Department Deputy Spokesperson. The spokesman's response, "I am not going to talk about an incident that happened three or four years prior." Typical. Yesterday I emailed and messaged Russia Today, pointed them to the 2012 incident and the hypocrisy. I was hoping Russia or some news agency would pick it up and report it and, more importantly, point out the hypocrisy of the West. Just a few hours ago, Russia accused Turkey of 'hypocrisy' after Erdogan had admitted airspace violation 'does not justify attack' in 2012. I do not know if this is the result of my tips, (I know most likely it is not,) but it somehow makes me happy. (The State Department press conference in the video was earlier today, after I had emailed and messaged Russia Today and other alternative news outlets; as in, the alternatives to the US propaganda news outlets like CNN, Fox and MSNBC.)