ktchong

Anyone but Hillary. Which is why I will vote for Trump. Unless Bern runs in the general election.

Another thing: All Hillary Clinton has talked about is what she can do for women, women, women - to the extent that men, Democratic men, are being turned off by her campaign. And with all her women talk, she has not been able to completely secure female votes, (i.e., young women favor Bernie Sanders over Hillary Clinton.) Hillary currently has a huge gender gap problem: a lot of men refuse to vote for her. And it is not being discussed in the media or remedied by her campaign. Resource: National Journal: Hillary Clinton’s Problem With Men The Washington Times: Hillary Clinton’s male-voter problem — and 3 other remarkable 2016 stats Townhall: Hillary’s Problems With Male Voters Further Highlights Why She’s An Awful Candidate Salon: The truth about Hillary Clinton’s “problem” with women: In reality, men in New Hampshire also rejected her in droves and backed Bernie Hillary has been winning the primaries for one and only one reasons: black votes. Black people love the Clintons. But guess what? Blacks are still a minority and won't be able to carry Hillary in the general election. I think Hillary is gonna get slaughtered in the general election. So, everyone should get prepared for the era of President Trump. I do not think Donald Trump will actually build a wall, (and a wall will not keep out the illegals anyway.) However, what he will do is to make lives so miserable and hostile to illegal immigrants that they will be forced to pack and leave America, (i.e., like what illegal immigrants in Arizona did after the state had started persecuted them- they packed up, left and fled to other states like California.) He won't be able to ban Muslims in America, but he will also make lives miserable and hostile to Muslims. Frankly, either scenario does not affect me. Donald Trump does not like Asians, but he is not specifically targeting us either. So his "racism" or "bigotry" is not my problem, (and he is running on a nativist campaign.) I do not think illegal immigrants (the "Dreamers" being the exceptions) should be allowed to stay. I have sympathy for the "Dreamers" - they were brought into the country as children, and this is the country they grew up in and the only country they ever know. It was not their choice to become illegal immigrant, so I have no problem with allowing them to become US citizens. My problem with Obama's DREAM Act is that if we allow them to become citizens, then their parents - who illegally entered the country as adults and brought their children with them - those parents will also be able to become US citizens through the children. That I have a YUGE problem with. And this whole "what about the family?" argument keep being raised by Latinos offends me. Maybe in Hispanic cultures and nations, families are so important that people can break laws and get away because they have to keep the families together. In America, however, if a father or mother has young children, and he/she breaks a law, we still arrest and prosecute them, and put them in prison. Breaking up their family is irrelevant. Having a family does not give anyone the license to break laws. You can't demand us to change/ignore our immigration laws because you want to keep your lawbreaking families together. So unless we have some sort of laws the specifically say, okay, the Dreamers (who were brought into the country as children) will be granted a pathway to citizenship BUT not their parents, then I can't support any immigration reform. And obviously you guys already know I do not like Muslims. Which is why I have no problem voting for Donald Trump if Bernie Sanders is not running in the general election.

It is like a paper-rock-scissor. Hillary beats Bernie. Bernie beats Trump. And Trump beats Hillary. References: Currnt Affairs: Unless the Democrats Run Sanders, A Trump Nomination Means a Trump Presidency - Feb 23, 2016 Forbes: Why Hillary Clinton Can't Win In 2016 - Feb 19, 2016 Salon: Hillary Clinton just can’t win: Democrats need to accept that only Bernie Sanders can defeat the GOP - Feb 19, 2016 Here are the highlights of how the Clinton vs Trump General Election will play out: BTW, Hillary Clinton is currently being investigated by the FBI, not over her email but over some potentially illegal financial contributions received by her Clinton Foundation. There is a good chance that Hillary Clinton will face a federal indictment. If that happens, it will be a disaster for the Democratic Party.

Deadpool is so overrated.

My first choice is Bernie Sanders, but he seems to be done. I will not vote for Hillary Clinton. My second choice: Donald Trump. If you look through the "noises", (i.e., his supposedly "offensive" positions on illegal immigrants and Muslims - and neither concerns me,) his other positions are actually not so bad and even admirable: And frankly: illegal immigrants really do not have the right to be here, and I do not like Muslims anyway.

Analyzing Trump's speech - he uses NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming).

I will probably vote for Trump. My first choice would be Bernie Sanders, but I think Hillary Clinton will be the Democratic nominee. So, if I go to the voting booth and have to pick Hillary, Trump or someone who has no chance of winning, I will vote for Trump.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIMsKvbHN3g

The top GOP pollster, Frank Luntz, sent out a memo last week on the "Snapchat Generation" (aka "Millennials".) He is freaking out that his own poll shows that the Millennials are "terrifyingly liberal", and 87% of them will likely vote in the upcoming Presidential election. Sources: https://theintercept.com/2016/02/24/top-gop-pollster-young-americans-are-terrifyingly-liberal/ http://static.politico.com/bc/7c/c808106e44eaa8855a3a12553bb7/snapchat-generation-release.pdf If 87% of millennials actually show up to vote in November, they will decimate Donald Trump or whoever the GOP Presidential candidate may be. If they vote.

Not exactly sure, but something is happening that has never happened before: it's one minority (Asians) openly revolted against another minority (Blacks). Have you seen something like this before? I haven't, certainly not in recent memory. I have a feeling that, it's just a matter of time before Asians rebel against and break away from the "rainbow coalition" on the left.

Link: New York Post: Asian and black communities square off over cop prosecution For some reason it has not been reported in TV news...

Here is the rule of US politics in this celebrity-obsessed country: Celebrities ALWAYS win when they run for political office. Only one celebrity has lost a political election, and that celebrity was Clay Aiken, who was an openly gay man running for congress in a conservative Southern state. All the other celebrities who ran for office - Ronald Regan, Clint Eastwood, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jesse Ventura, Jerry Springer, Al Franken, Sonny Bono, etc. - every single one of them, won. Donald Trump is popular than many of those other celebrities who ran for office *and* won. Given this country's track record, I am fairly certain that Donald Trump will become the next President of the United States. (Unfortunately.)

October Surprise: The FBI indicts Hillary Clinton.

How the hell did they shoot/edit that thing??!?

Apparently white people did not know Beyonce is Black.

Not a Civ fan. I have never played any Civ game after Civ 2. XCOM: Enemy Unknown/Within was really the first game I bought from Firaxis, and I bought the game a year after it had been released. Well, now that I know Firaxis' business practice, I will know how to deal with their releases: do not buy their games until after two expansions.

XCOM 2's overall user review score at Steam is currently at 72% (mostly positive). Highlights from the first few "most recommended" negative reviews on Steam: Salient Soldier: Majin no Kuragari: Kryogeneva: Otakuoverlord: Mazrim: machcio: I pre-ordered the Digital Deluxe version... and refunded the game after about an hour of suffering its performance and technical problems. I left a negative review due to glitches and lack of polish. I do not want to support a buggy releases or a developer that releases a buggy games. I do not want to embolden and encourage game developers/publishers to continue to release buggy games. XCOM 2 was the first game I pre-ordered. I will never pre-order another game again, ever. Certainly never again from Faraxis and 2K Games. Both Firaxis and 2K are now on my "never buy on first day" and "do not buy until fully patched" ****list. A developer/publisher who disrespects its customers by releasing buggy games does not deserve my money and support.

BraceVC: "Oh I see this opinion is also 1 year old...so its outdated anyway" He has been all over the news today. Which was what prompted me to make a post about him. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-35491495 http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/feb/04/daryush-roosh-v-valizadeh-cancels-neo-masculinist-meetings-over-safety http://www.newsweek.com/daryush-valizadeh-return-kings-meeting-roosh-v-neomasulinism-422724 http://www.latimes.com/socal/daily-pilot/news/tn-dpt-me-0204-valizadeh-meetings-canceled-20160203-story.html http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/pro-rape-pick-up-artist-roosh-v-is-mobilising-british-men-heres/ http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-35474206 http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/feb/3/legal-rape-group-draws-fire-hacktivists-ahead-rall/? http://www.newsweek.com/roosh-v-uk-ban-423009?piano_d=1 All dated today. Mostly, I am troubled by MRA and Red Pillers' support of him due to ignorance: he is stealthly spreading Islam in the guise of men's activism, you dumbass. Stop supporting him. Most people do not know of his Muslim root or that his teaching is a "mini version" of Islam (as he said so himself) because the video in the first post is the ONLY time he disclosed he is a Muslim and he is teaching Islam. His name is not "Roosh V" . His real name is Daryush Valizadeh - an Iranian name. And all the Men's Right and Red Pill morons just support him without looking into his background and true agenda: hey, dumbasses, you are supporting a Muslim who is stealthily spreading Islam while pretending to be fighting for men.

Holy mother of all craps. Jump to 2:24: I am going to point that out in various Red Pill and Men's Right forums and site... and become the most hated man in the manosphere. He is currently facing a serious backlash and a potential travel ban to Canada due to his proposal in http://www.rooshv.com/how-to-stop-rape

N/M.

Someone mentioned Jim Webb a few pages ago. I wanted to respond but I did not have time when I read it. So here is how I (a moderate liberal, not a regressive leftist) think of Jim Webb: Jim Webb is a moderate Republican from a bygone era, (i.e., the 1980s and early 1990s.) He is actually a moderate conservative, not a liberal. He is a conservative without the Jesus, bigotry or crazy. The contemporary Republican Party has become too extreme and far right to tolerate his kind, so he fled to the Democrat Party that has swung right (but not quite enough to replace the original GOP; although in recent years, the Democrat Party has swung back left a little due to the influences of new rising stars like Elizabeth Warren, Bill de Blasio, Bernie Sanders, etc.) I watched the Democratic debates, googled Jim Webb, and read his profiles. Then I realized, "wait a sec, he is the kind of Republican my dad voted for back in the old days!" (Back in the 1980s when Asians supported the Republican Party.) I cannot support Jim Webb because I do not want the Democrat Party to become a replacement for the bygone Republican Party. If he becomes the leadership of the Democratic Party, Democrats will likely swing right and become more conservative to become more like the original Republican Party. Conservatives will effectively have two candidates in the race: Jim Webb (a moderate conservative) and the radical right candidate (either Donald Trump or Ted Cruz). Liberals will be cheated out of a representation in the presidential race.

Source: Wikipedia entry on Guthrie vs. Elliott