ktchong

A Vaporeon Pokemon appeared in Central Park:

Also, Sony has declared war on any man who criticizes the movie - IMO, I think we should all boycott Paul Feig's movies from now on, and make sure his career will be over after his despicable behaviors:

Sony put a review embargo on the movie. The reviews are not supposed to come out until the movie opens. When a movie studio put a same-day movie embargo on a movie, you already know the movie must be really bad. Well, someone broke the review embargo. He said in the YouTube comment section that he had not signed a "non-disclosure" or any agreement for seeing the premiere/screening, so Sony can't be able to touch him other than trying to use some fake excuse to take down his YouTube video.

I've watched videos of Stefan Molyneux. While I agree with him on few issues, (i.e., do not date/marry single mothers, the problems created by Islam and Muslims in Europe, etc.,) the guy is a closet bigot and racist - which means he himself is a hypocrite. He is a white supremacist who has shown to be very racist and condescending towards black people and just non-white people in general. He is basically Rush Limbaugh (minus the Christian freakery) on YouTube. So at least now we know where Valsuelm is coming from.

Cersei and House Lannister are screwed. Daenerys, King of the North, House Tyrell (Queen of Thorns) and Dorne will gang up on Cersei. Cersei has too many enemies and no allies.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wfa-iBgzXA

Rotherham voted 68-32 for Leave. Rotherham has had enough of Muslim rape gangs.

In time of war, murders and rapes become common occurences. That is how wars are. So, are you saying Muslims living in Europe are waging a war on Europeans? That certainly seems like it. I suppose that is why people are saying Muslims in Europe are waging a Rape "Jihad" on Europeans.

So you think Wikipedia just created those cases out of thin air? That none of those rape cases happened and Wikipedia made them up? BTW, those are all cases that have been investigated, put on trial, and the Muslim rapists were convicted. So it was not like Wikipedia just invented them. Because raping is solely a muslim business .... riiiiiiiiiiiight... give me a break... *sighs* Rape gangs and sexual grooming are Muslim businesses. I have not heard of any other demographic group that do those things on such a large scale. For example: Chinese or Koreans do not have rape gangs targeting white women. Chinese or Koreans do not groom little girl for sexual slavery. Yet we keep reading about how Muslims - in particularly Pakistanis (who are unfortunately called "Asians" by the British media) - consistently commit those atrocities. Here you have and example of Christian performed gang rape https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/05/27/dozens-of-men-took-part-in-the-gang-rape-of-a-brazilian-teen-the-the-video-made-it-online/ Which is actually uncommon. As I said: Which is a pattern. Which is a culture of Islam. FYI: the founder of Islam himself was a bandit warlord in his late life who was going around pillaging, plundring, raping and abducting women as sex slaves. That was what Mohammad did. That is what Islam was founded on. And that is what Islam is. Mohammad was a brutal warlord; he was not a hippy who renounced violence and went around preaching non-violence; he was not a prince who renounced power and wealth to pursue enlightenment. Mohammad was not a peaceful man in his life. So what makes you think Islam is any different from the behaviors of its founder?

So you think Wikipedia just created those cases out of thin air? That none of those rape cases happened and Wikipedia made them up? BTW, those are all cases that have been investigated, put on trial, and the Muslim rapists were convicted. So it was not like Wikipedia just invented them. Because raping is solely a muslim business .... riiiiiiiiiiiight... give me a break... *sighs* Rape gangs and sexual grooming are Muslim businesses. I have not heard of any other demographic group that do those things on such a large scale. For example: Chinese or Koreans do not have rape gangs targeting white women. Chinese or Koreans do not groom little girl for sexual slavery. Yet we keep reading about how Muslims - in particularly Pakistanis (who are unfortunately called "Asians" by the British media) - consistently commit those atrocities. It is a Muslim thing, because I remember when I was in college in the late 1990s, Muslims in Indonesia (whom Obama used as the examples of "moderate Muslims") were targeting local Chinese women for gang rape. I still remember a bunch of Indonesia Chinese women in my university who were granted immediately asylum by the US government due to the incident. For me, the pattern of how Muslims act and behave is clear. Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_1998_riots_of_Indonesia

Why not? Better than the the undemocratic EU that is run by unelected, appointed officials, i.e., the European Commission in particular, who routinely overturn local laws passed by locally elected officials.

For one thing, now that UK is free to persue tough immigration laws to halt migration without having the EU interfering and overturning those new immigration laws. EU has a habit of allowing - or even encouraging - member nations to pass open-door immigration laws, and at the same time overturning any efforts of member nations to toughen up immigration laws and stopping migration, including Muslim migration coming in from outside the EU.

Maybe not, but it is the perception that EU does that matters.

So you think Wikipedia just created those cases out of thin air? That none of those rape cases happened and Wikipedia made them up? BTW, those are all cases that have been investigated, put on trial, and the Muslim rapists were convicted. So it was not like Wikipedia just invented them.

Let's just be frank here: The primary reasons people voted for Brexit is to stop Muslim migration. The working class voted for Brexit because they are scared, sick and tired of hearing Muslim rape gangs migrating into their neighboodhoods and targetting their women. The elites, upper-class and wealthy do not care because they have not been the not the victims of Muslim migration: Muslim migrants moved into low-income and poor neighborhoods. They have not been not moving into neighborhoods of the elite and wealthy, wrecking havoc on the families and communities of the upper-class, and raping and sexually grooming their daughters and sisters. I was reading on Wikipedia about the series of Rotherham child rape committed by Muslims against British women. Then I reached the end of the article and see a list of similar rape cases - all committed by Muslims (mostly Pakistani Muslims) against the local white women. The Muslim rape gang problem in the UK (or just in Europe in general) is just like the mass shooting problem in the US - i.e., they have common occurences. Except in the UK and Europe, the government and the media have long refused to report the rape cases due to political correctness and fear of being labeled as racist and Islamophobic (until the recent Colonge incident in Germany, which has really changed climate in Europe.) Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal#See_also

We know the demise of House Frey is coming up soon.

What will happen to House Karstark and House Umber? After the Battle of Bastards, House Bolton is no more. The Bolton bloodline has been wiped out, by Ramsay's own stupidity and Sansa's revenge. So what will happen to House Karstark and House Umber? They have betrayed the Stark and joined House Bolton. House Umber is responsible for the death of a male Stark heir. I image a large portion of their armies perished in the Battle of Bastards. The two treasonous Houses are now in a weakened state. Will Sansa go after House Karstark and House Umber? Hopefully Sansa will go Rains of Castamere on them. No mercy for traitors.

Sansa likely did not know if Littlefinger would keep his words until the Knights of the Vale actually arrived. With Littlefinger, you'd never know if he would keep his words...