Meshugger

I'm not surprised really. She changes her tone depending who she is adressing at any given moment. There aren't any prominent republicans around to tell the children to stop messing around while the adults are talking? I mean actively having 'sabotage' as a strategy? I am now actively starting to believe that these two are in facts plants working for Trump, not against him, as there's no way people would like to vote, well sincerely that is, for someone that claims that their winning achievement is to make others fail.

Oby can I ask you something...are you a women? If you were I would feel quite bad about how I spoke to you in the past because I would never be rude if you were women? Who knows? enigma.JPG Kum to Finland. We sit in sauna and make fun out of Swedes. Then we have vodka contest. As absurd as it may sound, but Hoonding is not far off here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_cleansing_myth Bruce is actually one of the saner ones compared to the rest of yahoo's that live there. Speaking of which, he's 41? Hahahahaha

I hate to say it - to specifically you, that is - but Meshugger is trolling you. A single parent (mother or father) does not a person define. Don't feed the trolls - at least, not when they're actually trolling. P.S. I'm probably only obligated to say this because I was raised by only my mother, too. Oh, there's only trolling to certain degree. Raised by a single parent is not necessarily detriment to a child's development in some cases, but in others it might be. I was sincerely curious because i Bruce's behaviour just seems odd at times, like him using the same infantile arguments girls would do to tease boys and then seeming to be 1) completely surprised by the "colorful" responses, 2) failing to understand why he gets them and 3) finally shifts the blame on those responding for being mean in their tone. I have suspected as much for a long time and his life story explains it well. There's more that could be said, but i leave him alone for now. My suspicions were warranted and i got what i wanted. Cheerio!

Well thats basically what you have done when you joined the EU You just can't help yourself, can you? But thanks for highlighting on how EU is bad Europe and western civilization at large. OMG....please dont tell you are seriously complaining about the EU.,.,.... Says the one who admits to preposterous idea that weapons haven't solved anything and that someone else should be in charge of your safety and rights. Considering the level of retort sounds like something a 12 year old girl would make....were you raised without a father figure? Or perhaps by a single mother? Either way, stop drunkposting. I'm stoned not drunk....why you guys in such a bad mood ? Hmmm, no sense of responsibility or awereness of surrounding atmosphere. Yup, sounds like the result of a weak, or the lack of, father figure. No wonder you hate Trump.

Well thats basically what you have done when you joined the EU You just can't help yourself, can you? But thanks for highlighting on how EU is bad Europe and western civilization at large. OMG....please dont tell you are seriously complaining about the EU.,.,.... Says the one who admits to preposterous idea that weapons haven't solved anything and that someone else should be in charge of your safety and rights. Considering the level of retort sounds like something a 12 year old girl would make....were you raised without a father figure? Or perhaps by a single mother? Either way, stop drunkposting.

Well thats basically what you have done when you joined the EU You just can't help yourself, can you? But thanks for highlighting on how EU is bad Europe and western civilization at large.

As we all know, weapons haven't solved anything in this world and we should always trust someone else for our safety and for our rights.

He almost sounds like /pol/. What a time to be alive. How so? He sounds quite like another politics board, except without calling everything a spook. He's analysis & criticism is the same, just without the spook.

Oh my It'll be great. We'll call it "butthurt" and it'll be great.

He almost sounds like /pol/. What a time to be alive.

Oh my

“There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.” ― John Adams In any case, blame Hamilton and Jefferson for the US having two parties I like how we missed that one BUT BY GOD GUYS THE FOUNDING FATHERS SAID WE NEED GUNS IN AN ERA WHEN THE RIFLES WERE DRASTICALLY DIFFERENT FROM THE FULLY AUTOMATIC 30-BULLETS-IN-THE-CHAMBER ASSAULT RIFLES WE HAVE TODAY. NOPE, NO NEED TO REGULATE THAT AT ALL! The public had access to more powerful weapons than those issued by the army back in the day when the declaration of independence was a quite new piece of paper, completely legally of course. So things haven't changed that much, relatively speaking. But the objective situation matters a great deal. In 1776 you murder a child for walking on your lawn and now you spend half an hour reloading while all your armed neighbors get a shot at you or have time to alert the authorities. In 2016, you murder half the room before the remaining half pulls their own assault rifles out, with enough shots between them to kill you and perhaps wound a couple more with some misfiring. The purpose behind the 2nd Amendment is self defense. You can absolutely protect yourself with a pistol, rifle or shotgun. An assault rifle is, quite frankly, a terrible weapon for self-defense. You're at far greater risk of hitting someone you didn't intend to hit, or if you're shooting at an intruder in your home, you'll now have several holes in the wall behind him while you're also paying more for the use of the weapon itself. Why not just use a damned pistol? People who buy assault rifles are either those that want it for recreation or those that are truly nutty. I'm sorry, but recreation doesn't hold a lot of value in the face of deadlier mass shootings. I am no legal scholar so I cannot say what the amendment says in spirit or what precedents there are, my interests lies more in keeping the state from getting a monopoly of violence. Also there is the part where you should draw the line on what is "too powerful", while easy to say for nuclear missiles and grand explosives it is much more difficult for the terms "arms" or "firearms". Finally there 3D printing and what that will bring.

The ones that makes an armed resistence possible of course.

Using your devilish female charms to lure him back?

“There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.” ― John Adams In any case, blame Hamilton and Jefferson for the US having two parties I like how we missed that one BUT BY GOD GUYS THE FOUNDING FATHERS SAID WE NEED GUNS IN AN ERA WHEN THE RIFLES WERE DRASTICALLY DIFFERENT FROM THE FULLY AUTOMATIC 30-BULLETS-IN-THE-CHAMBER ASSAULT RIFLES WE HAVE TODAY. NOPE, NO NEED TO REGULATE THAT AT ALL! The public had access to more powerful weapons than those issued by the army back in the day when the declaration of independence was a quite new piece of paper, completely legally of course. So things haven't changed that much, relatively speaking.

Tone-policing, like a clock.

“There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble apprehension, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.” ― John Adams In any case, blame Hamilton and Jefferson for the US having two parties True, my post was a tribute to George Washington's farewell speech, slightly misfired though.

I ? Also I didnt want to come across as implying I know more than our American friends about there own elections but as I said my view is not all my own but people who I would consider are political analysts except they never go on a TV and work for the private sector People are asking you to provide a reasonable argument on how Hillary is the most suitable candidate compared to the rest. It is beside the point on what connections you have or what conclusions they have drawn from whatever methods they use. They simply want to hear your own conclusion. Bringing in that people should trust media-shy people that you know and how they are using analytical tools unavailable to the major public, or hinting that the results are incomprehensible without the right knowledge is as stereotypical global-banker-establishment as you can come to a point of being almost hysterically funny. Hence the caricature of a jewish merchant.

I ?

Now you're sounding like a caricature of a jewish merchant.

The **** The guy didn't even look old.

What? Get outta here, he can't be dead.

It's one of the founders of ID Software (in the middle): He left after Quake in order to create his life long dream: Daikatana. The rest is history.

It was bound to happen.

You dont think if there was real evidence against Hilary the FBI would have charged her by now? http://www.c-span.org/video/?406228-4/washington-journal-joseph-digenova-hillary-clintons-emails Most important part is from 09:05 to about 14:20.