Meshugger

Only if you find "more babies" to be a goal worthy of pursuing in and of itself. Your sardonic downplaying of having a family aside, I took that premise as a given. The nuclear family unit is the cornerstone of society.

Look, another thing we agree on: let's forget religion. Look, a whole bunch of things we disagree on. By prohibiting abortion you will disable victims of rape to abort they're child. By prohibiting abortion you will disable poor women who did not intend to get pregnant from aborting the child. That woman may not be able to afford her own life, needless to say that of a child's. So, rather than saving one life by prohibiting abortion, you are ruining two lifes: that of the mother who needs to witness her child growing up in agony, and the child who grows up in agony itself. By prohibiting abortion you will disable women who carry children with a major genetic disorder firm aborting the child. So, what kind of existence are you saving? You may save a exitence, but you destroy potentially two, three, four or however big a family may be lifes. And one of those destroyed lifes, and in some cases the most destroyed life, is the one you were so keen on saving. Aside from no one can pinpoint from where exactly life begins, there you have the crux of the problem. As carriers of life, it's ultimately the responsibility of the woman for bringing the child to this world. By extension is it not then society's moral duty to nurture values for women to make sure that they pick partners who can provide for them safety, both financially and emotionally, so that any child, accidental or not, is brought to this world with minimal suffering? And for the men to be virtuous and choose women who have these values when they look a partner for their future family that they have to provide? Sadly these kinds of discussions have been pushed away from pop-culture and can only be found in the domain of the religious. yes, but sadly our society does not do so. So, how should the woman choose right now? I'm atheist btw... It requires a change of culture and that requires people to step up as role models for the generations to come. It's a slow process, but as the revolution of the 60's showed, nothing is impossible as long as there is a will.

Urrr, what agreement are they talking about here? (read from the bottom up) https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/47397 I read it like that there was an agreement between the Sanders and Hillary for him not to attack her on certain issues but he went rogue.

...to become robot-philosopher-kings? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXa9tXcMhXQ

I have to give it Johnsson this time, the guy can make you laugh.

Subtly implying that Hillary supporters are alone and victims of violence. The comic needs more work.

Look, another thing we agree on: let's forget religion. Look, a whole bunch of things we disagree on. By prohibiting abortion you will disable victims of rape to abort they're child. By prohibiting abortion you will disable poor women who did not intend to get pregnant from aborting the child. That woman may not be able to afford her own life, needless to say that of a child's. So, rather than saving one life by prohibiting abortion, you are ruining two lifes: that of the mother who needs to witness her child growing up in agony, and the child who grows up in agony itself. By prohibiting abortion you will disable women who carry children with a major genetic disorder firm aborting the child. So, what kind of existence are you saving? You may save a exitence, but you destroy potentially two, three, four or however big a family may be lifes. And one of those destroyed lifes, and in some cases the most destroyed life, is the one you were so keen on saving. Aside from no one can pinpoint from where exactly life begins, there you have the crux of the problem. As carriers of life, it's ultimately the responsibility of the woman for bringing the child to this world. By extension is it not then society's moral duty to nurture values for women to make sure that they pick partners who can provide for them safety, both financially and emotionally, so that any child, accidental or not, is brought to this world with minimal suffering? And for the men to be virtuous and choose women who have these values when they look a partner for their future family that they have to provide? Sadly these kinds of discussions have been pushed away from pop-culture and can only be found in the domain of the religious.

lol, electrical voting. What a dumb idea.

Ah, the #NeverTrump-ers are at it again. I am sure that aspie 40 year old unmarried mormon with a lemonhead is a good investment by the neocons. William Kristal must be proud.

This keeps in getting eerie. What the hell are they talking about? https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/30613

The insanity is any sane person giving her credence, let alone people in the political glitterati.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/15893 http://www.editionjs.com/img/abramovic/ So let me get this straigth. Hillary's campaign manager engages in "spirit cooking", meaning breast milk, sperm and blood. Wow.

Since the are rumors floating around (mostly from the truepundit-site) that part of Clinton machine and the DoJ are involved in traficking and child prostitution, it caused the autistic anons to dig like never before. Resulting in the quite hilarious self-revelation: //edit: Is it this perhaps? https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10052

The goals justify the means and all that.

Human psychology in action. No one wants to be around the loser and everyone naturally flocks around the winner. Ha, that sounds like something I'd write. Of course as entertaining as that would it's not going to happen. Just like Sanders had no chance of being the Democrat nominee Trump has no chance of being the President. In other news, for the 5 hipsters who care about his opinion Žižek has said he'd vote for Trump. Watching his fanbase try to rationalize that is pretty funny. You know that the left has gone awry when Zizek is starting to support Trump.

What https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/45131

The debates in the British parliament should be mandatory broadcasted to everyone for didactic purposes in wit and for rhetorical learning.

Don't worry, we will finally know the extent of her medical condition when she has to use it in order to avoid going to jail.

A nice, long, and informative article describing populism in the past and in the current day, written by someone not being a Trump supporter: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/11/02/the-populist-explosion-new-book-explains-rise-of-trump-sanders-and-the-populist-future/

Yeah, plebeians should know their places when the patricians decide.

The lines have been drawn in the sand and all that, but for once in a long time someone from outside the political machinery has a chance to claim the presidency, and even challenging the current paradigm of globalism to boot. So why not?

Well or is at least notable. The idea that there are scumbags out there is pretty obvious. And not as if there is some narrative here that this is fighting against, as well. Relax, I was just messing with you.

Everyone, lets only post if it changes anything.

Are you insinuating that a bunch of **** have once again foiled the plan a utopia of mother Gaia? Well, i never!

Big news, Barack and Michelle Obama are no longer following Hillary Clinton on Twitter: https://twitter.com/AveEuropa/status/793509771689197568?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw Perhaps something to do with this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRu3U-nwyhw