Meshugger

Good news everyone! Eron Gjoni got funded to get a lawyer to lift his gag order againt Zoe. Once lifted, i wonder what seeeeecrets he will spill. Reddit celebrated this wonderful event by shadowbanning him.

Fast gameplay or bust.

^huh?

Interesting. Tell me about Mad Max. Why does he get strapped to a car and wear a mask? Because no one knew who he was before he put on the mask. No tell me about this grand master plan of his.

I just saw it. It was a Mad Max movie for sure with its campy antics, ridiculous bad guys and car explosions. However, it was pretty much 2 hours of nonstop action, which was simply too much, as you felt completely exhausted mentally after watching it. It was not as good as Road Warrior, but a good Mad Max movie in itself. Two things: 1) They were quite clever with including a feminist as a creative consultant. They payed some very minor lip service in order to get away with very, very graphic violence against women. Kudos for playing her and the reviewers like a violin. 2) It is definately not the greatest thing ever. It's a fun, dumb action movie done rather well. It was simply released at the perfect time.

I'm not gonna read all that. What's the controversy? Or is it just plain old ****posting?

"The magical 8" has been announced to go to the SPJ Panel: http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1sm7nul For those who are lazy: Milo Yanopolis - Writer of the GJP article on Breitbart Brad Wardell - CEO of Stardock. Painted as a rapist by game media when falsely accusod of being so Cathy Young - Contributing editor at Reason.com Christian Hoff Sommers - Author, Professor and contributor for AEI Oliver Campbell - Needs no explanation Mark Seb - from 8chan's /v/, creator of videos such as William Usher - Leaker of the GJP. Has his own media site at http://oneangrygamer.net Jennifer Dawwe - Video game creator and designer of Seedscape (http://dapperswine.com/seedscape/) Bullied by SJWs and the media for her pro-GG views. Looking forward for this!

Heh, i chuckled. http://8ch.net/pol/src/1431735156969.png

Now, now. Tom Hardy is not that bad of an actor.

If I was involved in marketing, i would play the whole "GRL POWAH" to bits even if it is just mere lip service to the useful idiots. That way a movie can only get into a win-win situation. The old fans get their action and campy enemies, the petrolheads get their car races and the progressive reviewers will fall over themselves on how it is better than any other action movie ever made. That's just my opinion though, i will probably see it in the future. Nothing will beat Mad Max: Road Warrior.

Place your bets people. I hope that it is Gabe Newell

"Game of the Year", confirmed.

What, the game is released? Boy, how the time flies.

lol

Would this persist for the rest of the game or just the rest of your life ? The game will create a fake Twitter account based of the person killed, which will then attack your real Twitter, Facebook and Instagram-accounts. Then it will create other sock-puppet accounts, which will then be used to sealion everything you do online. Choices & consequences, bitch. Game on!

I haven't seen the movies since i was a kid, so i do not remember much except awesome explosions. I just felt that it sounded quite odd to put a main character in the background.

Mods will fix it.

What's this that i've been hearing about Mad Max being a sidekick in his own movie? True/false?

...Could we refrain from making the obvious (and therefore, boring) jokes, and instead try to focus on what she's saying? Pretty please, with cherry on the top? Jokes? I was dead serious. Red hair and big round boobs is my cryptonite. Combine them and all cognitive functions cease to work and only the mere instinct of pro-creation remains. But since you asked so nicely, carry on.

Is that old? Last I heard they said it was fine. It was just posted on the chan, maybe i am missing something? A while back DCC said they were not allowing GG shirts, a bunch of people complained, and then they said it was fine as long. IIRC of course. I hope that you're right. As for Liana, i have no idea what she is talking about. I am sucker for boobs and red hair, and when i think of those delicious double D's i am utterly incapable to process whatever she says or writes.

When ordering two cups of tea to room number 32 at his hotel, the finnish gentleman says in his perfect english: "too tee to toutetoo" I am so sorry Sarex for the derailment

Is that old? Last I heard they said it was fine. It was just posted on the chan, maybe i am missing something?

My citation says 10 per 100,000 deaths. Personally, I do not look it as numbers so much as I do lives. Do you realize that 10 deaths per 100,000, if we were to apply that to Obsidian forums as an example, means ten of us would be gone right now. Every life should be valued. I know that sounds corny, but think about yourself, all your uniqueness and all your stories and opinions you'd like to tell, and every single other human on earth is exactly as unique. The phrase "you are special, just like everyone" is infact not a paradox. 10 per 100000 deaths in the US are due to guns? Last study I looked at(http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/809516) shows obesity being responsible for 18.2% of deaths. That's 18200 per 100000. Being obese kills 1820x the rate of a machine designed to kill. I'd say violence is certainly isn't much, and obesity is easier to address both culturally and legally than guns, which are protected by an amendment and one of the most effective political lobbies in the world. As someone who has personally suffered with weight issues, including obesity, I can say that it is much worse than the statistically insignificant damage gun violence causes, in that it renders the lives of those who suffer with it plagued with health problems and a sense of worthlessness. Addressing the issues that cause obesity, such as the crap food available to low-income households or the lack of education in nutrition and fitness is also easier to do than touch gun ownership. And this makes guns a positive change to the country how? You have highlighted another problem within the USA. Just because it's a more widespread and severe problem does not mean guns are now golden tools of righteous justice, and it is still very questionable if they save more lives than they kill as things stand. It's interesting that, I actually am fairly ok with the concept of M.A.D. because I do not realistically expect any country to be so stupid as to launch a nuke. Lo and behold, Russia and the USA - for all their faults - have avoided just that despite tons of turmoil. But these are educated people elected into office and kept in check by multiple other educated people, also elected into office. Not to say that there's no such thing as a bad politician, just to say that the entire system is designed to severely diminish such a decision ever happening. Guns on the other hand are like M.A.D. on a smaller scale, the problem being any idiot can own a gun. Tell me, what do you do about the George Zimmerman's of the world who wanna make believe they're action movie cops? Thus, regulation. And for the fourth time, just wanna keep highlighting that no one has addressed that I've repeatedly asked for an example of assault rifles or other military-grade firearms ever being neccesary for civilian use. Look, in general i am not the biggest pro-gun guy, but you're not convincing me to be anti-gun either. Why do you want to ban something as fun as this? I would wager that the problem is deeper than just the gun itself and starting to regulate gun ownership will not magically change things, as we already talked about with current and inherited cultural values. The usage of guns have to change to something else than personal protection, but that would demand that people would have to feel less unsafe. But why re people feeling unsafe? Because of lack of social cohension. Why? Because lack of trust. What can change the lack of trust? I dunno, but i am working on it. George Zimmerman got shot at yesterday, but the guy missed btw.

*sigh*

How about you just listen & believe me for once. Which they shouldn't, according to you, because...? I find worrisome that there exists so many idiots in this society. You're dodging the question. Unlike what our experience in first grade has taught us, calling people who don't agree with us names does not count as a coherent argument about why they're wrong. Nice try, because i never implied that they shouldn't say anything. People can say whatever they want, but if it is idiotic, it simply just is, as i pointed out. And I never implied you implied they shouldn't say anything. I was pointing out that calling people names without expounding on the reasons why you're doing so is generally not seen as the road to constructive debate. There is no debate to be had. I am lecturing you guys.