Namutree Posted September 15, 2015 Posted September 15, 2015 also, even if the immigrant is legal, there is still room for exploitation, because an immigrant will accept to do ****ty jobs with under the table pay since he comes from a place with no job at all. while the local is always more picky So? Sounds win-win to me. "Good thing I don't heal my characters or they'd be really hurt." Is not something I should ever be thinking. I use blue text when I'm being sarcastic.
Volourn Posted September 15, 2015 Posted September 15, 2015 "They are here to suck on the teat of the government!" Some are some aren't. OMGZ Humanz. So varied. <> DWARVES IN PROJECT ETERNITY = VOLOURN HAS PLEDGED $250.
Zoraptor Posted September 15, 2015 Posted September 15, 2015 Most of the 'slavery' scams here are pretty typical ones with a new veneer- hold the immigrant to ransom against losing their job and being deported if they complain about being paid $2 at the local Indian restaurant being the most recent. Happens rather a lot and ironically there's a disproportionate number of former immigrants doing the exploiting of the new immigrants. The other one is a payment scam, set up a job that no New Zealander can or would do but which is tailored towards a particular immigrant who wants to move here- fluent mandarin architect willing to work for minimum wage, or similar- when a suitable candidate cannot be found through Work & Income NZ (the government unemployment/ job agency) they can import someone who usually pays a decent 5-6 figure sum to the person with the job for the work visa. And then we vote ourselves least corrupt country in the world for the xth year in succession.
213374U Posted September 15, 2015 Posted September 15, 2015 A few notes: a) We have no way of knowing if this story is even true. Wouldn't want to expand regulation making the lives of everyone involved in this issue harder to solve a problem that may not even exist. b) I don't see why I should be punished (in the form of higher taxes or public debt) so that immigrants who come here of their own free will can have a better time while here. If you really find the situation so detestable then just end the program altogether rather then make me partially subsidize the importation of immigrant workers. After all, the inspections, prosecutions, and stuff cost taxpayer money. c) Do you really think a few new laws to make a difference? The government is incompetent at everything it does, and is easy to fool. a) Read the court documents linked in the article. As far as facts are concerned, it looks pretty solid to me. You have doubts the story is true... because? b) Think of it this way: due to the way a globalized economy works, immigrant workers in the US are going to happen legally or not, whether you want to or not. It's not about them "having a better time", it's about, among other things, making sure that those who make use of immigrant labor do not gain an unfair advantage over those who don't by breaking the law. Further, do you think that a slave trade can be run only by withholding passports and cooking books? Hello, bribery, extortion, influence peddling etc. c) No need for new laws, really. Just resources to make sure the laws already in place aren't being ignored left and right. A pipe dream, I know... 1 - When he is best, he is a little worse than a man, and when he is worst, he is little better than a beast.
Namutree Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 (edited) a) Read the court documents linked in the article. As far as facts are concerned, it looks pretty solid to me. You have doubts the story is true... because? Very well... Alright, I'll concede this point. +1 for you. b) Think of it this way: due to the way a globalized economy works, immigrant workers in the US are going to happen legally or not, whether you want to or not. It's not about them "having a better time", it's about, among other things, making sure that those who make use of immigrant labor do not gain an unfair advantage over those who don't by breaking the law. Doesn't change the fact that I (and the other taxpayers) would be getting the bill to ensure that those whom illegally abuse their foreign workers don't have an advantage over those who don't. Those foreigners come here of their own choice. THEY and only they are responsible for their well-being. I never asked them to come here, and I don't want to be punished for them being here. Besides this program should just be shut down altogether as the government shouldn't be getting it's nose in the economy. c) No need for new laws, really. Just resources to make sure the laws already in place aren't being ignored left and right. A pipe dream, I know... Well, I'm glad you at least realize it's a pipe dream. Edited September 16, 2015 by Namutree "Good thing I don't heal my characters or they'd be really hurt." Is not something I should ever be thinking. I use blue text when I'm being sarcastic.
Hurlshort Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 You know, there are actual economists and immigration experts that do reports and studies on this stuff. But hey, lets ignore the experts.
Namutree Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 You know, there are actual economists and immigration experts that do reports and studies on this stuff. But hey, lets ignore the experts. Ok, let's ignore them. "Good thing I don't heal my characters or they'd be really hurt." Is not something I should ever be thinking. I use blue text when I'm being sarcastic.
213374U Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 Doesn't change the fact that I (and the other taxpayers) would be getting the bill to ensure that those whom illegally abuse their foreign workers don't have an advantage over those who don't. Those foreigners come here of their own choice. THEY and only they are responsible for their well-being. I never asked them to come here, and I don't want to be punished for them being here. Besides this program should just be shut down altogether as the government shouldn't be getting it's nose in the economy. To a point, I'd agree. However, consider that they may not have the tools to look after their own well-being: litigating requires money, and money is precisely the thing these people will be left without if they sue their employer, as they are specifically barred from looking for a job while on a H-2 visa. When the choice is starving in your own country or accepting what amounts to seasonal slavery in a foreign country, you don't get to be picky about workplace conditions. Beggars can't be choosers. But beyond that, it boils down to this simple question: do you want to have immigration and labor laws? Or any laws at all, for that matter? (Y/N). If the answer is yes, you need to earmark an amount of what the state makes through tax collection to make sure these laws are upheld. If you don't want to have these laws, well... that'd be an interesting experiment. The argument that you are being punished in the form of taxation for stuff that has nothing to do with you directly isn't entirely without merit, but the rationale is that it's your part of the "social contract" that makes it possible for you to live in an orderly society, much like you have to pay for cops to uphold traffic rules even if you don't drive yourself. The issue at the root is that you are never given an option to opt out of said "contract". - When he is best, he is a little worse than a man, and when he is worst, he is little better than a beast.
aluminiumtrioxid Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 Doesn't change the fact that I (and the other taxpayers) would be getting the bill to ensure that those whom illegally abuse their foreign workers don't have an advantage over those who don't. Those foreigners come here of their own choice. THEY and only they are responsible for their well-being. I never asked them to come here, and I don't want to be punished for them being here. Besides this program should just be shut down altogether as the government shouldn't be getting it's nose in the economy. The argument that you are being punished in the form of taxation for stuff that has nothing to do with you directly isn't entirely without merit, but the rationale is that it's your part of the "social contract" that makes it possible for you to live in an orderly society, much like you have to pay for cops to uphold traffic rules even if you don't drive yourself. The issue at the root is that you are never given an option to opt out of said "contract". And there's the fact that the US government is the poster child of unnecessary spending, so the idea of "allocating resources to make sure that vulnerable people aren't living in hellish conditions = tax raise" sounds like utter bull**** to me. "Lulz is not the highest aspiration of art and mankind, no matter what the Encyclopedia Dramatica says."
teknoman2 Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 also, even if the immigrant is legal, there is still room for exploitation, because an immigrant will accept to do ****ty jobs with under the table pay since he comes from a place with no job at all. while the local is always more picky So? Sounds win-win to me. it's win-win for the bosses but in the long run the average man will suffer for it The words freedom and liberty, are diminishing the true meaning of the abstract concept they try to explain. The true nature of freedom is such, that the human mind is unable to comprehend it, so we make a cage and name it freedom in order to give a tangible meaning to what we dont understand, just as our ancestors made gods like Thor or Zeus to explain thunder. -Teknoman2- What? You thought it was a quote from some well known wise guy from the past? Stupidity leads to willful ignorance - willful ignorance leads to hope - hope leads to sex - and that is how a new generation of fools is born! We are hardcore role players... When we go to bed with a girl, we roll a D20 to see if we hit the target and a D6 to see how much penetration damage we did. Modern democracy is: the sheep voting for which dog will be the shepherd's right hand.
BruceVC Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 (edited) also, even if the immigrant is legal, there is still room for exploitation, because an immigrant will accept to do ****ty jobs with under the table pay since he comes from a place with no job at all. while the local is always more picky So? Sounds win-win to me. it's win-win for the bosses but in the long run the average man will suffer for it Interestingly enough this is a real social issue in South Africa and climaxed in the appalling Xenophobia we have seen over the last few years https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenophobia_in_South_Africa Basically foreign black Africans are unfairly blamed for taking jobs and also accepting working under worse conditions than local people and also accepting less money. While another accusation is local black South Africans are generally lazy and have a sense of entitlement so people prefer hiring foreigners There is some truth in both views but its not fair to target foreign black Africans as a reason for the overall economic slowdown in the country Edited September 16, 2015 by BruceVC "Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is and saw Virtue in her shape how lovely: and pined his loss” John Milton "We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.” - George Bernard Shaw "What counts in life is not the mere fact that we have lived. It is what difference we have made to the lives of others that will determine the significance of the life we lead" - Nelson Mandela
Namutree Posted September 16, 2015 Posted September 16, 2015 And there's the fact that the US government is the poster child of unnecessary spending, so the idea of "allocating resources to make sure that vulnerable people aren't living in hellish conditions = tax raise" sounds like utter bull**** to me. Hey, I want to end the rest of the pointless spending too. So I can't be accused of not being consistent. If you want change; end the program altogether. "Good thing I don't heal my characters or they'd be really hurt." Is not something I should ever be thinking. I use blue text when I'm being sarcastic.
Wrath of Dagon Posted December 4, 2015 Author Posted December 4, 2015 All you Americans are fired : http://www.buzzfeed.com/jessicagarrison/all-you-americans-are-fired#.mwbyGOZVry "Moral indignation is a standard strategy for endowing the idiot with dignity." Marshall McLuhan
Wrath of Dagon Posted December 5, 2015 Author Posted December 5, 2015 Republican Congressmen pushing for more H2B visas and lower wages : http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/12/05/gop-legislators-push-plan-replace-americans-import-264000-foreign-workers/ "Moral indignation is a standard strategy for endowing the idiot with dignity." Marshall McLuhan
Meshugger Posted December 5, 2015 Posted December 5, 2015 It will continue until the following happens: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defenestrations_of_Prague I still like to see a peaceful solution though. "Some men see things as they are and say why?""I dream things that never were and say why not?"- George Bernard Shaw"Hope in reality is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the torments of man."- Friedrich Nietzsche "The amount of energy necessary to refute bull**** is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it." - Some guy
Wrath of Dagon Posted December 5, 2015 Author Posted December 5, 2015 Too bad the voters are so ignorant and apathetic. "Moral indignation is a standard strategy for endowing the idiot with dignity." Marshall McLuhan
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now