Official comments regarding Alpha Protocol 2

[VirtualTrek]

So, I was looking for podcasts related to the game and came upon this little thing...

 

"Sega

[khawaja07]

yay! plz sega.. only because of its little gameplay flaws ,little graphical flaws. and some glitches make this game less interesting than it has to be.. plz make a proper sequel for it and plz improve its gameplay like bioware did to mass effect 2 as compared to mass effect 1

[Lord2]

Well, that's good news I guess.

 

But how can they be talking about a sequel before the first one is released - and poor reviewed?

Odd....

 

But they really need to fix the "features". Other than the gameplay's annoyances it was pretty good, the choices were excellent: really interesting!

[Alpha]

^^

 

Reviews are just opinions and can't be taken seriously.

 

I hope Obsidian please the gamers that support the game with a future sequel better than AP.

[Libertarian]

Killzone 1 was awful, yet it received a pretty damn good sequel.

 

The same looks to be happening with the Two Worlds francise. The first was terrible, yet #2 looks at least solid.

 

AP is better than the original KZ and TW, so it should get a sequel, imo.

[Starwars]

I guess it will depend a lot on how it does sales-wise. And while the game did get slammed in some reviews, I hope SEGA has also read that European mags and sites have given it pretty good scores. It might also be a bit of a grower game.

 

I'm not normally one to support sequels but I think an AP2 could be quite interesting. But only if OEI gets to do it.

[Lord2]

Killzone 1 was awful, yet it received a pretty damn good sequel.

 

The same looks to be happening with the Two Worlds francise. The first was terrible, yet #2 looks at least solid.

 

AP is better than the original KZ and TW, so it should get a sequel, imo.

 

But didn't both of those games sell good? As for the AP sales, it's impossible to tell as the game haven't hit the American shelves yet.

[Zoraptor]

Everything I've heard suggests Two Worlds did not sell well, but was relatively cheap to make and seen as having good potential.

[Deng]

Well, that's good news I guess.

 

But how can they be talking about a sequel before the first one is released - and poor reviewed?

Odd....

 

But they really need to fix the "features". Other than the gameplay's annoyances it was pretty good, the choices were excellent: really interesting!

 

 

Because there were a lot of excellent reviews, and it is actually at it's core a very excellent game that does a lot of things very very well.

[Oblarg]

Well, that's good news I guess.

 

But how can they be talking about a sequel before the first one is released - and poor reviewed?

Odd....

 

But they really need to fix the "features". Other than the gameplay's annoyances it was pretty good, the choices were excellent: really interesting!

 

It was only poorly reviewed by the major US reviewers. Most of the European reviewers liked it quite a bit, as did one or two reputable American review websites (1up gave it a B+ and praised it quite a bit).

[Kostchtchie]

OMFG yes yes!!!! this is great news...i love this game

Edited June 1, 2010 by Kostchtchie

[Kostchtchie]

Well, that's good news I guess.

 

But how can they be talking about a sequel before the first one is released - and poor reviewed?

Odd....

 

But they really need to fix the "features". Other than the gameplay's annoyances it was pretty good, the choices were excellent: really interesting!

 

It was only poorly reviewed by the major US reviewers. Most of the European reviewers liked it quite a bit, as did one or two reputable American review websites (1up gave it a B+ and praised it quite a bit).

 

 

yeah i noticed that also