Dark Moth Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 LINK to BBC article The Sabian Mandaeans - one of the oldest religious groups in the world - are facing extinction, according to its leaders. They claim that Islamic extremists in Iraq are trying to wipe them out through forced conversions, rape and murder. The Mandaeans are pacifists, followers of Adam, Noah and John the Baptist. They have lived in what is now Iraq since before Islam and Christianity. More than 80% have been forced to flee the country and now live as refugees in Syria and Jordan. Even there they do not feel safe - but they say western governments are unwilling to take them in. Just another blemish on what has become the ugly face of Iraq. If you're not shocked yet, just read what they did to the kid. I think it also helps to bring a reality check to those who still think the insurgents are merely "protecting their land" against US occupiers. The main reason I actually posted this though, is that I think this underscores a deeper problem in Iraq, which I've been saying for years now. That is, tribal hatred. Unlike Afghanistan, Iraq is marred by ethnic (and religious) prejudices that go much further back than Saddam's rule. As sad as it is to say, Saddam, as terrible as he may have been, might have actually kept the Iraqis from tearing each other apart through his own brutal reign. :sad: This is very sad, but it strongly reminds me of Blackhawk Down. Ask an Iraqi Shiite on the street, and they'll say they want peace. However, ask them if they're willing to share power with say, the Sunnis, or any so and so religious group, don't be surprised if they utter a big fat 'NO!'. I guess the question is, with all this prejudice in mind, helped in no small part by the power vacuum created after the U.S. invasion, can true peace be achieved anytime soon? Furthermore, will the U.S. actually be able to do anything about it? *Minor note: Please try to keep any religious trolling to a minimum. This goes doubly for you, Sand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walsingham Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 I got the Blackhawk Down reference! See aso the 112 shiites killed just now in an explosion. I've no doubt there is violence aginst people who see us as occupiers, but the main drift seems to be some kind of hellish Balkan style ethnic cleansing. "It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"." -Elwood Blues tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sand Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 (edited) This is one of the many reasons why I was againstthe war. Saddam was a brutal dictator, yet he maintained control and stability while Bush and his cronies brought6 in chaos and destruction. Only the Iraqis can give themselves peace and stability. It cannot, will not be forced upon them. No matter how many troops Bush brings in the ethnic divisions will tear that country apart anbd to think otherwise is being naive. The US may be a melting pot, but Iraq is not. I do think that their will be peace, eventually, but only when one faction is dominant and can brutally bully others into place. Much like what Iraq had prior to Bush's invasion. If people can just learn to leave each other alone a lot of the problems over there, and here, would probably not exist. Edited March 6, 2007 by Sand Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer. @\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?" Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy." Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astr0creep Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 It is to the advantage of the west that this region of the world be kept in chaos. While they're tearing each other appart and not looking at us, we can freely plunder their ressources for our own greedu little needs. http://entertainmentandbeyond.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gfted1 Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 This is one of the many reasons why I was againstthe war. Saddam was a brutal dictator, yet he maintained control and stability while Bush and his cronies brought6 in chaos and destruction. Only the Iraqis can give themselves peace and stability. It cannot, will not be forced upon them. No matter how many troops Bush brings in the ethnic divisions will tear that country apart anbd to think otherwise is being naive. The US may be a melting pot, but Iraq is not. Make up you mind. Or is this more of your tried and true "The US cant do nothin right!"? @astr0creep: There is something to be said for "fighting the enemy there or we will be fighting the enemy here" reasoning. "I'm your biggest fan, Ill follow you until you love me, Papa" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astr0creep Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 @astr0creep: There is something to be said for "fighting the enemy there or we will be fighting the enemy here" reasoning. Sure. That's why tomorrow morning I'll be at your front door waiting to punch you in the face. Because I want your computer. http://entertainmentandbeyond.blogspot.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gfted1 Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 @astr0creep: There is something to be said for "fighting the enemy there or we will be fighting the enemy here" reasoning. Sure. That's why tomorrow morning I'll be at your front door waiting to punch you in the face. Because I want your computer. Ha, thats what you think smartypants. Now that Im aware of your nefarious plan I will look through my peephole and turn the sprinklers on. Sorry it had to come to that but you brought it on yourself. "I'm your biggest fan, Ill follow you until you love me, Papa" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volourn Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 "Saddam was a brutal dictator, yet he maintained control and stability" O RLY? No, he didn't. He maintained power; but Iraq hasn't been stable in decades throughout his rule. Know your history. And, there was quite a bit of chaos, and destruction during his watch as well. *shrug* DWARVES IN PROJECT ETERNITY = VOLOURN HAS PLEDGED $250. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steelfiredragon Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 the islamist say they are peaceful, but to convert anyone by force is not peaceful, and some islamist do just that, and killing in the name of god. in life there are two ways 1: do things by the edge of a sword knowing that you will get it in the end. 2: by diplomacy, the pen is mightier than the sword Strength through Mercy Head Torturor of the Cult of the Anti-gnome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azure79 Posted March 6, 2007 Share Posted March 6, 2007 Everytime I read something like this, I question whether religion or any other faith based system does anything except create intolerance and hatred. We obviously have a long way to go. I only hope we don't obliterate ourselves first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sand Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 This is one of the many reasons why I was againstthe war. Saddam was a brutal dictator, yet he maintained control and stability while Bush and his cronies brought6 in chaos and destruction. Only the Iraqis can give themselves peace and stability. It cannot, will not be forced upon them. No matter how many troops Bush brings in the ethnic divisions will tear that country apart anbd to think otherwise is being naive. The US may be a melting pot, but Iraq is not. Make up you mind. Or is this more of your tried and true "The US cant do nothin right!"? @astr0creep: There is something to be said for "fighting the enemy there or we will be fighting the enemy here" reasoning. Saddam was an Iraqi, not an outsider. Only the Iraqis will be able to bring stability to their region if they choose it and not any outside power that forces it upon them, may that be the US or not. Do I need to explain everything to you or are you just acting thick-headed on purpose? Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer. @\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?" Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy." Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Raven Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 the islamist say they are peaceful, but to convert anyone by force is not peaceful, and some islamist do just that, and killing in the name of god. in life there are two ways 1: do things by the edge of a sword knowing that you will get it in the end. 2: by diplomacy, the pen is mightier than the sword Just history repeating itself with a different religion. Christians did the same thing with Pagans and heretics in the past. Hades was the life of the party. RIP You'll be missed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sand Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Religion is often used to justify one's violent and brutal actions against another who does not share the same faith. Then again, if they didn't have religion to use they would use something else. Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer. @\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?" Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy." Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Raven Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Everytime I read something like this, I question whether religion or any other faith based system does anything except create intolerance and hatred. We obviously have a long way to go. I only hope we don't obliterate ourselves first. Religion = evil Whats the main cause of wars, death, destruction and the suffering it brings right now? Religion. If there was such a thing as god/s and I was their god, I would have deserted my flock a long time ago for bastardizing my message of peace and kindness. Convert or die. This is the way of love and peace. Hades was the life of the party. RIP You'll be missed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tale Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 the islamist say they are peaceful, but to convert anyone by force is not peaceful, and some islamist do just that, and killing in the name of god. in life there are two ways 1: do things by the edge of a sword knowing that you will get it in the end. 2: by diplomacy, the pen is mightier than the sword Just history repeating itself with a different religion. Christians did the same thing with Pagans and heretics in the past. They didn't get all of us! Who wants a pamphlet? "Show me a man who "plays fair" and I'll show you a very talented cheater." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sand Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Everytime I read something like this, I question whether religion or any other faith based system does anything except create intolerance and hatred. We obviously have a long way to go. I only hope we don't obliterate ourselves first. Religion = evil Whats the main cause of wars, death, destruction and the suffering it brings right now? Religion. If there was such a thing as god/s and I was their god, I would have deserted my flock a long time ago for bastardizing my message of peace and kindness. Convert or die. This is the way of love and peace. I disagree. I think the main cause for war, death, and destruction comes from the fact that humans can't leave each other alone. They have to interfere in everything, even when they have no business or right to interfere in the first place. Religion is just a convenient tool to justify that interference. If we humans didn't have religion we would just use something else to justify such brutality. Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer. @\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?" Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy." Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atreides Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Sometimes you got to wonder whether they're that crazy to pull stuff like this. Sadly some people don't know how to use freedom and there are others with an agenda to keep each other fighting. Spreading beauty with my katana. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azure79 Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Everytime I read something like this, I question whether religion or any other faith based system does anything except create intolerance and hatred. We obviously have a long way to go. I only hope we don't obliterate ourselves first. Religion = evil Whats the main cause of wars, death, destruction and the suffering it brings right now? Religion. If there was such a thing as god/s and I was their god, I would have deserted my flock a long time ago for bastardizing my message of peace and kindness. Convert or die. This is the way of love and peace. I disagree. I think the main cause for war, death, and destruction comes from the fact that humans can't leave each other alone. They have to interfere in everything, even when they have no business or right to interfere in the first place. Religion is just a convenient tool to justify that interference. If we humans didn't have religion we would just use something else to justify such brutality. Differences in political ideology FTW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sand Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Its the old Blue versus Red mentality. Humans are a violent creature by nature and will always be aggressive towards those who are deemed different, may that difference be religion, political views, physical appearance, or whatever. Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer. @\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?" Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy." Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volourn Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 (edited) Really? I don't feel naturally violent. In fact, people who use violence tick me off, and make me want to beat the crap out of them!!! Edited March 7, 2007 by Volourn DWARVES IN PROJECT ETERNITY = VOLOURN HAS PLEDGED $250. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sand Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Thus you use violence. Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer. @\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?" Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy." Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calax Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 This is very sad, but it strongly reminds me of Blackhawk Down. Ask an Iraqi Shiite on the street, and they'll say they want peace. However, ask them if they're willing to share power with say, the Sunnis, or any so and so religious group, don't be surprised if they utter a big fat 'NO!'. I guess the question is, with all this prejudice in mind, helped in no small part by the power vacuum created after the U.S. invasion, can true peace be achieved anytime soon? Furthermore, will the U.S. actually be able to do anything about it? *twitch* If you asked the VERY SAME question to any of the people in power currently they'd tell you no, then run off and make several laws that said that nobody other than a certain ethnic/religious group would be able to attain power (admittedly they oculdn't do it now without at least one senator being tossed from office) I'm fairly certain that in most countries that have such deep devides you'd find the same thing, not just between Shiites and Sunnis, but between catholics, WASP's, Flying spagettii monsterarians, british Jedi, Jews, neo-nazis... Anyone would say that if they were allowed to answer unfettered by any sort of inhibition or consequence. The only difference in america is that our system of government forces politicians to plaster a smile to their face and say "I love you" to anyone and anything with the ability to vote. Victor of the 5 year fan fic competition! Kevin Butler will awesome your face off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taks Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 you're sorely mistaken if you really think the divides in any developed country even come close to comparing to those in third world locales, particularly one such as iraq. sorely mistaken... taks comrade taks... just because. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calax Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 you're sorely mistaken if you really think the divides in any developed country even come close to comparing to those in third world locales, particularly one such as iraq. sorely mistaken... taks then why are the Irish fighting the brits? Victor of the 5 year fan fic competition! Kevin Butler will awesome your face off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steelfiredragon Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 the islamist say they are peaceful, but to convert anyone by force is not peaceful, and some islamist do just that, and killing in the name of god. in life there are two ways 1: do things by the edge of a sword knowing that you will get it in the end. 2: by diplomacy, the pen is mightier than the sword Just history repeating itself with a different religion. Christians did the same thing with Pagans and heretics in the past. that is true, though we did it to the jews too, but i wouldnt considier them heretics or pagans. Strength through Mercy Head Torturor of the Cult of the Anti-gnome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts