Calax Posted June 22, 2006 Share Posted June 22, 2006 Dude, I don't care what you say, Woozie is one of the best characters ever. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I liked the hippy. Victor of the 5 year fan fic competition! Kevin Butler will awesome your face off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bokishi Posted June 22, 2006 Share Posted June 22, 2006 I liked Big Smoke Current 3DMark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Masta Revan Posted June 23, 2006 Share Posted June 23, 2006 But kotor 2 is not better than halo 2.And at least in halo 2 and san andreas your character can talk <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I'm trying so hard not to flame you right now...You know nothing about video games. Let's just leave it at that. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Ya probably should said what you had to say.But my opinion is that your character shouldn't talk cause it suppose to be your character and your imagination.you need to be creative yourself jedi killer. I pitty the fool who don't have the force. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purgatorio Posted June 23, 2006 Share Posted June 23, 2006 No because that would be to difficult,hence the topic,Masta. S.A.S.I.S.P.G.M.D.G.S.M.B. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xard Posted June 23, 2006 Share Posted June 23, 2006 I liked Big Smoke <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I hated him. Sand Andreas was fun game, and that is most important thing, right? But still, comparing SA and k2 is just stupid. How can it be a no ob build. It has PROVEN effective. I dare you to show your builds and I will tear you apart in an arugment about how these builds will won them. - OverPowered Godzilla (OPG) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenghuang Posted June 23, 2006 Share Posted June 23, 2006 I liked Big Smoke <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I busted a cap in his fat ass without shedding a tear. I ain't sure I could've done that ifit was Woozie. RIP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Architect Posted June 23, 2006 Share Posted June 23, 2006 GTA: San Andreas is an awesome game but nah, KOTOR II is better IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris the jedi killer Posted June 23, 2006 Author Share Posted June 23, 2006 You have to kill ryder and smoke A coward dies a thousand deaths but a soulja dies one~ 2Pac Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calax Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 yes... then you paint yourself blue and red and run around yelling CAPTAIN PLANET! I did like the "no tounge devil" you meet before getting a garage/chopshop. Victor of the 5 year fan fic competition! Kevin Butler will awesome your face off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bokishi Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 I liked Big Smoke <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I busted a cap in his fat ass without shedding a tear. I ain't sure I could've done that ifit was Woozie. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> But the drive-in scene was funny. Current 3DMark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenghuang Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 He was still a drug dealing bastard. RIP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mastaGAW Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 San Andreas and KOTOR2 are on my list of 5 best game I've ever played at 1 & 2. I have to pick SA over KOTOR though. Unlike what most of you people are saying SA had a very involving and interesting story. It was like most other GTAs one big satire. The maincharacter had a more realistic personality than any other GTA character before. Claude the main of GTA3 was nothing but a silent errand boy and Vercetti was just shown as an angry man with the only peek into when you brought the printing press. CJ acted more realistically than both. For once the story didn't center around a guy trying to move up in the mafia it centered around someone trying to stay stuck at a spot in life he shouldn't have been in. It focused on the pointless fighting in a satirical way of the plights of many urban minority communities (even though many people playing probaly wouldn't understand). San Andreas did have a good story but I will agree that KOTOR2 had a better one, but the thing that makes SA better to me is the world. Its open and explorable unlike KOTOR2's. I liked 2 better than one storywise and gameplaywise but it felt too confined. Though the first one might have been confined as its predecessor it didn't feel like it. I prefer games that give open explorable worlds. KOTOR2 didn't do that it felt closed, confined, and claustrophobic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturm Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 (edited) I just remembered a realization: Comparison between the two games will have San Andreas be the game to prevail over K2. Why? K2 was a cluster f**k of a sequel. Atleast 40% of the game was cut. On top of that were the countless bugs that made it into every copy of the game and the game in general was rushed by half assed developers. Star Wars or not, the defects of the game put it far below SA. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Are you serious ? First of all,I said maybe 5% of the game was cut.Kotor 2 had the same amount of bugs that they were in the first game and in all my playthrough I only encountered one or two minor bugs.Secondly,It's the publisher Lucasarts who rushed the game.Finally,the only good they were in San Andreas was that when I play it...it remembered me how KOTOR 2 was superior to this game. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> 5%, gee you must have no sence of cut endings or a cut storyline what-so-ever, for Malachor was cut (parts in it) the ending was cut, party members stories and stuff where cut, oh, the grand list goes on I would say about 1/3 was cut EDIT: Oh and the GTA series should have been over after Vice City, they all follow the same storyline of some corrupted nin-com-poop who just goes around following gangs ect. First its the perspective of an Italian-American, now its Africa-American the only minor difference between these games is, they have a few things added in, different time period, different characters ect. KotOR could keep a straight story, with twists and had meaning to it Edited June 25, 2006 by Revan_Returns Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord_Sion Posted June 26, 2006 Share Posted June 26, 2006 SA was fun and is defiantely in the top of worlds best games but once u complete the game (the missions just normal ones) all u do is go around do secret missions (most of them boring) and stuff like that. But kotor 2had a great story line and very interesting features + the side missions are fun. the only bit i was ever bored at was the begining in peragaus and is the only game i would play ver and over and over so yeah. P.s how do u do cheats i dont get it a bit confusing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Revan Sky Posted June 26, 2006 Share Posted June 26, 2006 I just remembered a realization: Comparison between the two games will have San Andreas be the game to prevail over K2. Why? K2 was a cluster f**k of a sequel. Atleast 40% of the game was cut. On top of that were the countless bugs that made it into every copy of the game and the game in general was rushed by half assed developers. Star Wars or not, the defects of the game put it far below SA. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Are you serious ? First of all,I said maybe 5% of the game was cut.Kotor 2 had the same amount of bugs that they were in the first game and in all my playthrough I only encountered one or two minor bugs.Secondly,It's the publisher Lucasarts who rushed the game.Finally,the only good they were in San Andreas was that when I play it...it remembered me how KOTOR 2 was superior to this game. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> 5%, gee you must have no sence of cut endings or a cut storyline what-so-ever, for Malachor was cut (parts in it) the ending was cut, party members stories and stuff where cut, oh, the grand list goes on I would say about 1/3 was cut EDIT: Oh and the GTA series should have been over after Vice City, they all follow the same storyline of some corrupted nin-com-poop who just goes around following gangs ect. First its the perspective of an Italian-American, now its Africa-American the only minor difference between these games is, they have a few things added in, different time period, different characters ect. KotOR could keep a straight story, with twists and had meaning to it <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It would mean they cut from 7 to 12 hours of the game ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xard Posted June 26, 2006 Share Posted June 26, 2006 K2 definetly was not 12 hours long Storywise: A lot was cut Gameplay wise: Not very much. How can it be a no ob build. It has PROVEN effective. I dare you to show your builds and I will tear you apart in an arugment about how these builds will won them. - OverPowered Godzilla (OPG) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now