EnderAndrew Posted December 16, 2004 Posted December 16, 2004 I just noticed something. It has been suggested many a time that they allow larger avatars on this forum, like 80x80 or 100x100. Last time I checked, the limit was 60x60, which many said was too small for most pics to look pretty good. Yet, that limit has been supported, and maintained. Except, the new avatars in the gallaries that the staff put up are larger than that. I'm just saying.
Darque Posted December 16, 2004 Posted December 16, 2004 Yup. Been noted and offsite avatars are in the "you're screwed" zone still.... I don't think they're changing it either. <_<
Gorth Posted December 16, 2004 Posted December 16, 2004 Last time I checked, the limit was 60x60, which many said was too small for most pics to look pretty good. My avatar most be growing then, it's 64x64 pixels “He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice.” - Albert Einstein
Phosphor Posted December 16, 2004 Posted December 16, 2004 User-made avatars are limited to 64x64, but the on-site ones are larger.
Darque Posted December 16, 2004 Posted December 16, 2004 We need more on site ones then... not enough variety.
Kaftan Barlast Posted December 22, 2004 Posted December 22, 2004 If the servers can take it, implement it. DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
Qxiili Posted December 22, 2004 Posted December 22, 2004 The new limit is 64x64 but it doesnt seem to hold up, my avatar is actually a picture that is 500x500 but it scales it down for you.
Guest Eric328 Posted January 3, 2005 Posted January 3, 2005 I agree someone plz email obsidian about it its really getting on my nerves
EnderAndrew Posted January 3, 2005 Author Posted January 3, 2005 The GuildMaster is well aware that plenty of people think the avatar size is too small. And he has stated that they have no intention of changing said size.
Darque Posted January 3, 2005 Posted January 3, 2005 After careful thought, I think I prefer the fact that the offsite ones are smaller.... I've seen some very strange ones that I'm glad are so small
B5C Posted January 5, 2005 Posted January 5, 2005 Is there plans for more Obsidian avatars because this avatar (One im using) is becoming popular.
kumquatq3 Posted January 5, 2005 Posted January 5, 2005 User-made avatars are limited to 64x64, but the on-site ones are larger. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Damn you Canadian and damn your iron-fisted rule over these boards!
Dalmir "The Dark" Posted January 21, 2005 Posted January 21, 2005 Whoever said "size doesn't matter" was lying!!! What?
Oerwinde Posted January 23, 2005 Posted January 23, 2005 Hey, at least its not as bad as the Superhero Hype boards. You're limited to a 32x32 avatar until you reach 5000 posts. Then you can have a 120x120 one. The area between the balls and the butt is a hotbed of terrorist activity.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now