Elerond Posted yesterday at 04:33 PM Posted yesterday at 04:33 PM 35 minutes ago, Malcador said: Seems most comments are that this is carelessness from Russia. Certainly is likely, otherwise some sort of odd test of NATO but weird timing to do so. Then there's this And NAFO of course wants war. Finland's defense commentators speculate that it was purposeful provocation from Russia which aim is to see how united NATO is and how aggressive NATO will respond to such clear provocation, probably as preparation of increasing bombardment of western Ukraine with missiles and drones.
BruceVC Posted yesterday at 04:39 PM Posted yesterday at 04:39 PM 4 minutes ago, Elerond said: Finland's defense commentators speculate that it was purposeful provocation from Russia which aim is to see how united NATO is and how aggressive NATO will respond to such clear provocation, probably as preparation of increasing bombardment of western Ukraine with missiles and drones. Nothing surprises me around Russia's warmongering and provocations anymore but they denying it ...which is the normal response from Russia "Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is and saw Virtue in her shape how lovely: and pined his loss” John Milton "We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing.” - George Bernard Shaw "What counts in life is not the mere fact that we have lived. It is what difference we have made to the lives of others that will determine the significance of the life we lead" - Nelson Mandela
pmp10 Posted yesterday at 08:48 PM Posted yesterday at 08:48 PM 4 hours ago, Malcador said: Seems most comments are that this is carelessness from Russia. Certainly is likely, otherwise some sort of odd test of NATO but weird timing to do so. It's exactly about the timing as zapad is just about to start in Belarus. After the strikes on UK/EU affiliated sites in Kiev they have now moved to intimidating NATO and Poland. We will see if the west dares to respond in kind.
Zoraptor Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago Simplest explanation is that the drones GPS (/glonass) got mucked around with. Similar situation to the Ukrainian drone that hit near Tartu a couple of weeks ago (with basically no fanfare). The Ukrainians certainly were able to muck around with glonass for a bit since that was why the number of glide bomb videos from the Russians dropped right off for a couple of months, and if there's anything that would still be using vulnerable transceivers it's junker gerans. 1
kanisatha Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago On 9/10/2025 at 12:33 PM, Elerond said: Finland's defense commentators speculate that it was purposeful provocation from Russia which aim is to see how united NATO is and how aggressive NATO will respond to such clear provocation, probably as preparation of increasing bombardment of western Ukraine with missiles and drones. This is exactly my professional take as well. Putin knows how the military side of NATO will react. No need for him to test that. It is the political side of NATO that is suspect, and it totally makes sense Putin will want to (and will continue to) test the political will and unity of NATO. And Article 4 provocations are the best way to do so as well, because obviously an Article 5 provocation could very well backfire on him.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now