Namutree

At last my suggestion to add credibility to the GG movement has been implemented, well done for whoever created this. The site isn't official in any way, it's a nice enough site and all, but it isn't official, and everyone can still use the hashtag regardless of whether they approve of anything the site says. The site itself even states that gamergate is a leaderless mob and thus it isn't pretending to be any real form of authority, it isn't really your idea as much as it's just some random progamergate people deciding to make a website about gamergate. It at least allows people wanting to know what gamergate is about from some one progamergate to get some basic information.

It's not on TV anymore, but I've been watching, 'HBO's Spawn the Animated Series' on youtube.

No, but environmentalists websites and magazines will. "The Planet is Dead" Will be the name of the articles calling environmentalists losers and wanting them to be outcasts from politics. Then #Earthgate will begin.

Cool.

You want someone who disagrees with you that you can have an actual debate with? This is just a weak and irrelevant point that I was accused of during the interminable " Drama in the gaming industry " thread You don't like what I have to say so you think a proper response is something like " Bruce doesn't like to engage in debate " I try to answer all realistic responses, I have responded to you several times. But once again you don't like my answer so all you can say " Bruce doesn't like to engage in debate" Your comment doesn't reflect the reality of my posting etiquette The problem with debating you in this instance is that you've such a minority opinion in this case that it'll be unfair. There'll be 5+ different people ready to leap at any mistakes you make, and attack your position in different ways.

One day I'll make a part 2 and include him.

Because the US isn't taking this as seriously as it should. EDIT: Also they're incompetent.

I feel that these SJW's aren't really feminists. It's just a title they've given themselves to be holier-than-thou. The situation with TFYC is proof that helping women get into the gaming industry isn't a goal of theirs. They're just a clique of hipster douches who want to be considered intellectuals, but don't want to bother learning what they're talking about. It's unfair to hold feminism in disdain based on these people. We've already seen with the Factual feminist and TFYC that these pretenders don't represent actual feminism.

You want someone who disagrees with you that you can have an actual debate with? That's probably it.

Everybody here seems to disagree with Bruce. I don't know why, but a part of me is disappointed even though I too disagree with him.

I think that evaluation is a little harsh. Is along the same vein of strategy that the opposition uses, claim the high moral ground and shame everyone into compliance. Yeah well, I don't like them. So I don't want to adopt their attitude.

I think that evaluation is a little harsh.

I'm sorry Bruce, but I too disagree with the premise of this thread. Here's why: A) Happiness cannot be accurately measured. B) There is no such thing as "Western Ideology". The west does NOT have a united set of values/ideals. C) Happiness is not a measure that this, "Western Ideology" works. Let's say everyone is happy in the west, but it's based on deficit spending or abusing natural resources. Sure, we're happy, but such a system may not work in the long term.

Well, this is a neat thread.

I doubt your story. Likely it was some douche who knew her information was already online; so he posted it to make a point. It was a douche move by a douche. That's the theory I'm going with.

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2014/nov/06/afghanistan-shocking-indictment/ Amusing.

He's pretty old. I'm sure I can take him.

Actually if it is the "doxxing" that I witnessed, then it was an idiot who decided to prove that the information was publicly available and posted it. Whoever decided to do that is a douche.

Why Kanye West?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_II,_Prince_of_Orange He has an excellent mustache!

Good thinking. Balance of power and all that.

I've decided it would be fun if we could which of these great candidates would be the most popular choice for the role of a new deity. **** DeVos' name got censored! LOL! I'll call him Dock DeVos.

Oh my god, there will be even more Supernatural? Please god, if you exist then let this tv show finally die. It has become so, so bad. God isn't listening, we should find a new one that will rid the world of Supernatural. I vote Thanos. I'll start a poll.

I would rather not take the chance of you guys missing out on my post Just start a new SJW thread to talk about this kind of stuff. I'll visit it. No I only post what I consider are valid SJ issues in there own thread. I don't want to overdo it and also I don't really want a dedicated SJ thread, would you ? I guess not.