Jump to content

Musopticon?

Members
  • Posts

    8272
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Musopticon?

  1. Greenie, you're watching this closely, I bet? Suprisingly non-flamy, by the way. Continue on.
  2. The thing is: I don't know. It was all done by email and checks. Still, it's not the sponsor who made that site and those claims.
  3. I'd rather not prowl through tons of drivel to get an answer there. That means many blunt objects.
  4. Yeah, that's the one. Straight text copy-pasting doesn't link correctly, it seems.
  5. "Wait, I don't understand. Do you mean someone stole the movies and is claiming them as his own?" Oh yes.
  6. How would you bend light? With a light-wrench?!
  7. I'll try to keep this as civil as possible. No matter how hard it is. My long-time childhood friend is a rather popular internet flash "artist". He's quite new to the whole scene, but managed to get his share of pride by making a series of short killing animations featuring a rather homicidal rabbit. The content isn't supposed to be thoughtful, deep or skillful: they're mainly long pipes of gored rabbits. Three clips are out now and we've(I make some writing and brainstorming) nothing short conquered the most well-known flash sites. Juuso, my friend, even got a sponsor for his works, who did pay him, surprisingly enough. For an internet nerd, 500 dollars is a rather nice sum, for doing something he really loves. Here's a straight link to the newest one. No, it's not very tasteful: http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/238015 Still, that's just backround info, this is the zits: http://www.doggybagstudios.co.uk/bunnykillsite/ I'll give you some juicy morsels of the wrongness that is that site: "Yesterday the Silver Psycho Designs Director Zoheb Raja, announced that there will be a bunnykill game coming soon to our pc screens" Why have I not heard of this? Yesterday, I sat next to Juuso's comp, and we were cheerful of the success of BK 3. Not making a game. Not even thinking of making one. We don't even know where to begin asking for developing tools, for godsakes. No to mention finding someone to use them. "All of the Bunnykill
  8. I actually sold my KoTT, because it had nil replay value, but it's a worthy buy
  9. IE lasted so long because it relied on painted 2D backrounds, not full 3D worlds. Anyway, Jeff wouldn't stand up to any engine nowadays. I mean; look at some of the character, models they had(google helps): low-poly, blocky aliaised twaddlers. They were great then, but now even the basic NWN does better work. NWN2 supports 4 member parties (with summons and familiars), and it has graphic standards up to today's pars. Jefferson just can't compete.
  10. Thanks, but it still doesn't matter. Jefferson engine is obsolete already.
  11. No tail grabs?
  12. I like it too, even if it's a bit too short.
  13. Thanks but, I had already started to download from GH a minute ago. Best download site, I've found.
  14. I take it that you have still had some "practice", even if you can't legally drink?
  15. The mirrors don't work, but if this is the movie with the sky full of aircraft and the monster growling at the end; then yes, it's amazing.
  16. I liked Enclave too, but KoTT had nicer graphics and better fighting system. On the other hand, Enclave was a better game overall, didn't manage to beat Rune or Severance, though. The download links don't work.
  17. Starbreeze made Riddick? Gotta try the demo.
  18. The nose is wierd, but you have a serious sense of style. The fangirls can add in the praise and squeling...
  19. It's almost 5 years old now; I mean why would they bother?
  20. ****, that advert almost made me jump! And I thought it would have something to do with the forest.
  21. You do understand how old the Jefferson engine already is? It's older than NWN, which most people agree to be rather ugly already. I'm not saying that graphics are the main selling point of an rpg, but well...you know. NWN2 engine slightly modified would support larger parties, all the new graphical gimmicks, better textures etc.
  22. True dat.
×
×
  • Create New...