kanisatha

This game definitely interests me. Murder-mystery with no combat? Love it. Thanks for posting @Wormerine

They made the season 2 episodes soon after season 1 ended, but for some reason chose to not air season 2 in the summer of last year (2020) when it should've aired, and then not this summer either. They keep pushing back the airing date, so who knows if they will actually go ahead and air those episodes this year. I'm with you in liking the show. It was a fun little show with both main characters being quite likeable.

They have already said it will be a completely new game unrelated to the first game, set in a new star system and with new characters (though it is possible characters from the first game could make an appearance). And personally, I very much prefer it this way.

Plus that the Saudi troops who were supposed to be helping them were completely useless.

Okay, some exaggeration, as our military does still have fighting capability obviously (it should for the incredible amount of money we spend on it). But in general, yes, I am serious. Our readiness and combat capability are at alarmingly low rates these days, our accidents and screw-ups rates are at alarmingly high levels, and troops themselves are reporting they spend more time on "sensitivity" training than anything else.

I'm of the same mind. My gaming desktop is now six years old and will need refreshing soon. So any thought of playing CP2000 will be after that.

Not that surprised. If the exercise had been about wokeism our guys would've dominated. But this clearly was about warfighting, which is the one thing our troops are not trained in these days. We will soon be getting our ass handed to us when Xi and Putin coordinate their simultaneous moves into Taiwan and Ukraine respectively. It will be very sad that our rank and file troops will be the ones paying the ultimate price even as our worthless political and military elites will yet again escape with no costs to them.

As others have said, this is subjective. I hate the D:OS games, and consider some of the limitations of Larian's engine to be a huge part of my dislike. For instance, the Larian engine does not allow for pausing the game during real time exploration, and hence why it can only be used to make a TB game and not a RTwP game. And since I hate TB combat and much prefer RTwP, Larian's engine suck for me. I also don't like the visuals of the Larian engine, which to me comes across as garrish and cartoonish. Plus, I also think the reason they have that utterly stupid and annoying party movement system of chain-linking characters rather than the standard IE games way of handling party movement is a limitation of their engine. Now, obviously, if Obsidian were to develop an in-house engine, they don't have to be limited in any of these ways. But I don't want any such engine to use the Larian engine as some sort of rolemodel.

Geralt/witchers have inherent powers that are magic-like powers. In the games you can have a certain number of them equipped and active at a time. One of those that pretty much everyone commonly uses is that shield ability. Others include one that knocks back enemies and one that briefly cancels magical defenses.

OMG! This is almost word for word the same lecture I give to all my students in all my clases every semester! So good to see I'm not alone in seeing social media this way.

Don't know if anyone here likes old school wargames, but I'm playing a lot of The Operational Art of War 4 these days. As with previous editions the AI cheats a lot, which is to be expected I guess given the game is entirely about using numbers and formulas and algorithms to set up, run, and resolve everything. But I'm enjoying it tremendously.

Dandelion looks to be perfectly cast. Yeah the trailer looks awesome.

Yes of course I know this Not what I meant from the part you quoted.

No. That's why I said "gigantic." Purely as an example, if U.S. GDP/capita is 50,000. The "non-countries" are those with GDP/capita of, say, 100,000. But countries with, say, 55,000 would not be in that category. Furthermore, it ultimately depends on one's data for both GDP and population. I for one, as many international relations scholars do, reject GDP measured using the purchasing power parity index. So the data I would use for GDP would not show countries like the three you mention as having GDP/capita greater than the U.S. Making economic comparisons ultimately depends on the data one chooses to use, and I'm not sure anyone has a truly accurate measure of anything.

Haha, yeah. Always a pain having to explain to my students why non-country countries like Qatar and Luxembourg have gigantic GDP/capita.

This is how I saw it too. Furthermore, I would say that trash mobs being in a game is its own separate and independent issue, and not directly linked to whether the game is RTwP or TB. Don't know about D:OS2 as D:OS1 so strongly turned me off that franchise. But D:OS1 had plenty of trash mob encounters, and I do see at least a few such encounters in BG3 including especially the goblin camp fight which I see as very much a trash mob encounter (again, I'm not playing it yet myself, but I watch a lot of BG3 streams). BT4 also was entirely about trash mobs.

Yeah actual combat is, if anything, RT (no pause). As such, RTwP comes waaaay closer than TB. And this is a big part of why I find TB combat immersion-breaking for me: that one actor gets to go while all the other actors just sit there unable to do anything and just take getting wailed on. I'm just picturing the Taliban or the Nazis just sitting there patiently waiting their turn to kill you.

Good article, but makes me nervous about the game ending up exclusively first-person.

Here's what I posted recently in the WotR KS forum, and an Owlcat dev's reply. I'm interpreting that positively and am cautiously optimistic about the direction of their next game. Pathfinder: Wrath of the Righteous Kani The game is fantastic, Owlcat! The best D&D-like game out there. But I do want to take this opportunity here to make a suggestion for your next game. I know many people here and on the Owlcat forum (and presumably the discord channel) are already speculating about the next module to be used. I would love for you guys to NOT use an existing module for your next game. Using existing modules is nice for a studio just starting out as it gives you such a huge leg up on development, but it also limits and constrains you a lot. You now have two successful games under your belt. Time to fly! Time to go hire a bunch of quality writers and create and write your own new game. I hope you guys will consider this. 10/08/202111:12 am Owlcat Games Creator Thank you for the trust and support! We hope you won't be dissappointed by our next project :) 10/12/20217:26 am

Yes, correct, which serves to support what I'm saying. No, China's influence is waning, especially among the more "normal" regional states like RoK, Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, Australia, and Singapore (and where it already did not have any influence in Japan and India). These states are increasingly actively working to counter Chinese ambitions. And in Taiwan itself, anti-PRC sentiments have steadily increased with each generation. I believe the Chinese leadership was willing to wait out the Taiwanese people in the past because they too believed, then, that the Taiwanese people will become more pro-China as their memories of the civil war fade and China becomes more attractive as it rises in wealth and power. But now they see this is not happening, and especially young Taiwanese are more estranged from the PRC and, if anything, increasingly identifying as Taiwanese and not Chinese. Xi is getting desperate. He knows he's never going to get unification without a fight. But yes, he is also very nervous about launching a war that the world blames him for. That's why he is pursuing a policy currently of trying to intimidate and scare and rattle Taiwan, with all the airpower incursions and missile firings. He needs Taiwan to mess up and do something stupid (in reaction to these PRC provocations) that he can then use to justify the invasion, so that there is at least division within the international community about who is to blame.

This is simply not true, at least within academic circles. In academic writings the story has consistently been of continuing Chinese growth including their overtaking the US in absolute economic size. Brands and Beckley are the first to publish academic analysis showing China has peaked. And they are not just saying this in words. Beckley has another book recently which is entirely filled with numerical data (economic and social) demonstrating this conclusion. Also, Xi personally has demonstrated repeatedly, including in his handling of his power within the party, that he is extremely risk accepting and operates in the domain of gains (a fundamental change from previous PRC leaders post-Mao who were risk averse). And he has also personally staked his legacy on the reunification issue.

Taiwan is eminently defendable. It just comes down to the will of the Taiwanese to stand and fight. That is where I have my questions. I think the greatest weakness Taiwan faces is that a considerable number of people in Taiwan may have pro-PRC sympathies, and many of them will undoubtably be PRC sleepers who get activated prior to an invasion to sow chaos within critical military and civilian sectors of Taiwan. How will the Taiwanese govt and people react to this? As for more specific military issues, yes, fending off PRC air superiority over the straits will be rather difficult initially. But in time it can be reversed, because I don't at all buy the Chinese J-series fighters as being the tech marvels the Chinese claim they are. Nor do I have much respect for the combat prowess of Chinese fighter pilots. Taiwan is doing the correct thing here by not relying entirely on their own aircraft to counter PRC air power. That would be a losing proposition. Instead, Taiwan is acquiring SAMs to make China's air ops over Taiwan and the straits very costly to them. That's the correct way to go, and we ought to be selling them even more SAMs and a greater variety of those systems. Then, after Taiwan's SAMs have taken their toll, multiple US carriers operating in the area will be able to regain local air superiority. As for the PRC invasion force, there also the Taiwanese are doing things correctly in not counting on air power to go after Chinese landing craft and supply ships. Instead, they are acquiring a lot of ground-based short-range anti-ship missiles, small and versatile systems that can be mounted on small boats and trucks. That's how you saturate and overwhelm China's naval defenses, and sink their rather vulnerable invasion force. Having anti-ship capable submarine dominance in the area would also help in this tremendously, but that is the one area where thus far Taiwan has not been able to get much capability for itself, and will have to count on US subs dominating the area for them. And the US has been doing its part on this issue, now having over 60% of its submarine force based in the Pacific including all of its best subs, and with an ever-growing number of them forward-based in Guam and Hawa'ii. US subs are now also reorienting their focus away from land-attack and back to traditional anti-sub and anti-ship warfare capabilities, precisely for Taiwan operations. China's power has peaked (see a recent article by Brands and Beckley in Foreign Affairs), and it is going to be entering a long phase of power decline in the next few decades. And China (and Xi) know this themselves. But this is also what makes China even more dangerous, because as international relations theory teaches us, a major power whose power capabilities are flat or declining but whose geopolitical ambitions continue to increase and expand is the most likely to start a war. This is because they are so committed to their vision of themselves in a position of dominance, at least regionally, but while also realizing that their window for action is rapidly closing. And so they are very strongly compelled to act, and act now, before that window closes. The supreme irony here is that another great power faced this exact same dilemma about 85 years ago. And we all know how that turned out. When a great power's ambitions know no bounds but its power has peaked and is now potentially facing decline, that is the most dangerous combination of factors of all. War is coming in the WestPac. The chairman of the JCS, in Senate testimony recently, predicted a PRC invasion of Taiwan by 2027. I predict the invasion happening by 2024 if not sooner.

And the second Izumo is named Kaga! Japan is returning to great power politics, and I for one am perfectly happy about it. Soon RoK, and possibly even Australia and Indonesia, will have carriers. And China gets to reap what it has sowed.

We're just a short ways off from not needing the soldier altogether.

Actually my doctor and audiologist said it was an option, but they strongly advised keeping it as the very last option because putting in the implants means destroying your inner ear bits. Cost I do not know specifically other than that it is very expensive. But even for my hearing aid, which is a fancy programmable device that more than ten years ago cost something like $2,500+, my insurance covered everything including all the tests and other doctor/audiology visits and I had to pay only a total of about $700 myself. Seemed eminently reasonable.