Hmm. Ok, you got me there. That's what I get for trying to appear pompous in a language that is not native to me.
Luckily for me, I no longer have to submit school papers. )
Nope. I didn't admit his underlying point actually stands. I admitted that it might stand, from your far-fetched perspective, or whatever. I didn't wish deviate from the issue by discussing that issue at that particular moment, and that's why once more, I chose my words carefully. )
No. You are not understanding it correctly. Someone adamant about an easy yet wrong argument is indeed stupid. Someone who has joined recently or has not had much participation in the discussions here is indeed a n00b. Someone who mixes, takes out of context, or purposefully makes malicious (and erroneous) interpretations is twisting. And if that someone also uses rhetoric to hide personal attacks, he is being surreptitious. Hope that clears it up.
But yes, I try my best to have a dismissal ready for any contingency.
You have my permission to use it as a siggy. But if you do, you will be showing to everyone that you don't know the difference between having friends and being popular. And that won't make you very popular or earn you any friends.
Everyone's entitled to their own fantasies. And I already elaborated in a previous quote.
Can you prove I chose my username for that particular reason? Didn't think so.
Next.
So? It disarmed your entire argument, and you admitted yourself that I was right. What are you trying to prove? I'm not as sneaky as you are, I tell what I want to tell plain and bluntly. Don't try to find second meanings in my posts.
Obviously it's you who is confused. Read it through again, take a glass of hot milk with a drop of honey, and call me in the morning.
Really, is this your concept of baiting the troll? Discussing rhetoric and trying to make you fall for fallacies isn't quite my idea of "fun".