1) He announced it JFK style?
Right, I'll be sure to send Bush the memo "In the future, when NASA plans a new project, don't tell anybody".
Anyway, this thread is about plans for a moon base, not plans to send a human to mars.
Pretty much. They're not part of the ISS team. Don't blame me for that.
That's nice. Good luck to China. And good luck to you trying to relive the 'glory days' of the cold war, but somehow I doubt you'll get much success.
Helium-3 might be found on the moon in viable quantities; there's no guarantee. Anyway, helium-3 isn't as good as some people hype it to be. It's not a wonderfuel; most analyses estimate that using helium-3 as a fuel isn't worth it (infrastructure wise, but also based on the huge amount of He-3 by weight needed), let alone mining it from the moon. If it gets to the point people start fighting over helium-3, China and America as you know them today will already be dust in the wind.
Again, I`m talking about the inicitives such as the x-prize... out of the box innovations that may be stummbeled uppon. Contractors that charge goverments for tin foil to wrap the spacesandwiches are not independant contractors as far as I`m concerned heh. monopoly is bad ;P As for the government argument... I really see no huge benefit of governments leading the way. I moreso see the huge risk of ever increasing militarization of space and territorial disputes "offworld".
I think your imagination is getting too much air time here mate. It's a moon base. It's not a freaking missile silo on the moon. It's about a million times easier to strike earth from earth rather than from space. And we are so far away from 'colonising' space that it's laughable, yet you bring up 'offworld disputes' as if it's a valid argument for space today.
As for government monopoly - I'm very pleased the private sector is taking an interest in space. My point was that rules, regulations and restrictions on space should be in the government's hands (just as they are here on earth), and the government should hold the majority stake in space (Capitalists might disagree). If you can't see why at least government regulation is for the best, I'm seriously not going to argue with you.
The entire EU has a space agency so that's a good first step. And the EU's space agency integrates fairly seamlessly with Russia's and America's. Other countries involved in the ISS are: Brazil, Canada, Japan. I think this is pretty close to a UN space agency.
China has expressed some interest in joining the ISS, but hasn't yet. It seems as though they'd much rather have everything to themselves and thus build their own. That's their choice.
USA turned down Russian proposal for a joint mission to Mars I hear... so much for governments working together for the greater good heh... Gotta make sure the right colours fly on them spacerocks yep yep hehe...
While it annoys me that every post you make is political and aimed at seeing the worst in things, I'd just like to point out that Russia and the US have been working together in space for something like 20 years. If one of them wants to do a certain mission on their own, I hardly think it's time to proclaim a new cold war.
As a side note, NASA gets about half of their plutonium fuel for space from Russia, and as it stands has enough of their own to last about 2 more missions, running out in 2020. It's not the end of the space programme, but you can probably see why it's not the beginning of a new cold war, either.