Sarex

PC>arcade>handheld>masturbating with sandpaper>console.

How about them pinball players, I hear they go on tilt often!

More then console players? I am gonna bite.

She was you.

Looks very cool. I believe he was playing on a console (with a gamepad), because the camera was not very responsive. Except for the action combat (which is still not fully explained, so I'm holding my judgment), I liked everything I saw. That could have to do with the indoor environment, because there is a ceiling indoors that could be limiting the zoom out. Maybe the PCs get more zoom out (one can hope).

He had to say "push the button something happens"... Idk, I'm glad there is a tactical view, but all the rolling around and jumping is really bumming me out. It looks like they are trying to do the best of both worlds and I really hope it turns out great.

Yay, there is hope. (famous last words) xD

You could move the camera.

I just watched a few gameplay videos on youtube (haven't played DA:O in a long time ) and yeah I guess it had third person, but you could zoom out to tactical view and click with the mouse where you wanted your character to move. So in essence it still had that point and click feeling. where as in DA2 that is completely gone.

Oh and what is your opinion on why game was suddenly shifted to 3rd person in DA2?

They won't do this, because the main platform has shifted to consoles. The top down camera is great for mouse and keyboard, but the third person is great for a controller. I don't know how feasible it is to put it in as an option, because I don't know if they fully animate the environment or just do it so it looks good from third person.

That is really disappointing, the next thing I'm expecting to hear is that the pause function is getting removed, because, let's be honest, if the gameplay is going in that direction, who needs it.

So this is the conclusion to the Flemeth story then?

Man that feeling when I first got a bag of holding, so liberating and that that earth shattering felling when you discover that you can fill a bag of holding.

Yeah, it's tedious and boring. But I'm not very far in so I hope it picks up.

But they did, and personally I never had a problem with accuracy. The highlight of ME1 for me was when I could get off 3 Explosive bullets at a time near the end game, that was so op. XD

Started playing the PC version of Castlevania, and so far I am not impressed.

ME1 guns all had recoil, so be they future guns or not, they worked on the same principle. ME1 had a more complex gameplay design, which was fun to a lot of people including me, ME2/3 stream lined all that out and what you got was a generic shooter. It's basically the same thing people complained about in DA:O, that it was nowhere near as complex as BG.

Let me guess, Turkish nationality?

Translation, you don't know. Also read the post don't just skim them, prices may have gone up but so have sales and if your answers are going to be like that, fell free to not replay to my posts, I would appreciate it.

Please enlighten me.

But that is all capitalism, no one is going to tell a company that it's wrong for them to set their own prices to their product, be they medical or entertainment companies. There is no going, "it's ok for you(entertainment), but it's not ok for you(medical)". You either regulate all of them, or none of them. As for how it's wrong to charge for cut content, well let's be honest games are mostly targeted for young audiences. Do you expect kids to know better? Computing is much faster, software is much easier to use. Plus games sell on a much larger scale today.

Well neither of them is wrong, we are going by your logic. What it boils down to is that it's ok for companies to set their own prices.

It's not wrong at all, neither is it wrong that adobe charges an extra 1k for it's products in Australia, it's not wrong that companies demand obscene amounts for life saving drug, nor is it wrong that medical bills bankrupt families, that is just the good old capitalism in full swing. But making those game is also much easier now days.

But as we are moving in to digital space, publishers no longer have to pay dvd royalties, shipments, etc. But does that make them lower the cost of the game? No. So you can't really justify it with the old "the prices are rising" shtick.