plenilune
Members-
Posts
24 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Everything posted by plenilune
-
3.0.5 patch for DVD? Also, patch dl section is dead... http://eternity.obsidian.net/downloads/patches
-
Still waiting for this. If the devs are unwilling/unable for w/e reason, they should just say so.
-
Speaking of PotD. Now that AI is smarter, why would anyone choose the Defender talent over Guardian stance? Enemies seem to attack whatever they feel like, and your accuracy is too low to punish anyone breaking engagement. That +10 deflection from Guardian is so much more useful, because they protect the ones they attack. Sure the range is short, but if the enemies are going to attack your backline, why bother keeping a distance.
-
Soundtrack, again
plenilune replied to OnyxIdol's topic in Pillars of Eternity: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)
perhaps more than what can fit on a CD -
Wrong deflection value at Lv. 1
plenilune replied to plenilune's question in Pillars of Eternity: Technical Support (Spoiler Warning!)
bump -
From what I've gathered, the dispositions system is designed to reward players who respond to dialogue in a consistent manner for role playing reasons. So, I decided that my character would be "aggressive and passionate," but the term seems to be interpreted so broadly that it does not really align with my character, i.e. aggressive as in bold vs hot-headed, passionate as in romantic vs zealous. Also good vs evil can be a deciding factor in dialogue options but dispositions does not take that into account. I know JES' recommendation is to pick whatever feels appropriate for my character (and maybe turn off the qualifiers), but I also don't want to be locked out of dialogue options linked to a high level of disposition later in the game. Most likely, if I truly role-played my character, I'd have a moderately inconsistent distribution among all personality types, and be punished according to the system. What are your thoughts?
-
Damage Reduction?
plenilune replied to plenilune's topic in Pillars of Eternity: General Discussion (NO SPOILERS)
I suppose that makes sense. They could write a bit about that in the tooltip. -
I can't figure out what it means when an item description says something like DR:10 (Pierce:13 Burn:9 Freeze:9) Does that mean I get baseline DR of 10 to all damage types, plus 13 pierce, 9 burn and 9 freeze? I feel stupid.
-
Will this be our last beta?
-
Sensuki's Suggestions #014: Non-Terrible Inventory [Mockup]
plenilune replied to Sensuki's topic in Backer Beta Discussion
This is a good idea. I did NOT enjoy dragging stuff to the shared stash that had to be opened explicitly. It should be a simple drag & drop. Way too much time is spent managing inventory in these types of games. -
Sensuki's Suggestions #012: Non-Terrible Main HUD [Mockup]
plenilune replied to Sensuki's topic in Backer Beta Discussion
I'd rather they use the time to create a proper UI that 80% are happy with. They have a lot of UI work left... -
"No Bad Builds" a failure in practice?
plenilune replied to SergioCQH's topic in Backer Beta Discussion
I beg Mr. Sawyer to rethink the whole attributes system. It's not so much about MIG affecting spell damage as it is about a buff wizard passing all those MIG checks that involve physical feats. If the goal is to avoid dump stats why not give spells distinct bonuses based on a variety of attributes in a way that makes more sense? i.e. require DEX to cast lightning spells effectively, RES to cast spells like charm, or MIG for more physical spells. That way you can make a generic or specialized wizard and still be effective without being locked into one stat. -
The faces we get to choose from are all quite young-looking. All I ask for is at least 1 old looking face for each race/gender combination, and grey-ish hair color to match. It would be a shame to have all these character creation possibilities yet unable to role-play an old man.
-
That Celestial Sapling render is mouth-watering. It is my wallpaper now.
- 423 replies
-
- Josh Sawyer
- Wizards
-
(and 4 more)
Tagged with: