Chilloutman

Dota was first, i played it from middle school + they got best sond eva with babes watching man:

Funny how OG already beat both teams who have chance to meet them in Grand Finals

I think Boer is 'white guy'?

I actually agree with you, more power to them, lets just realocate those whose lend is taken back to Western countries and let them be as successfull as rest of Afrika

ofcourse, that's why it should be resolved in court, not by witch (mage?) hunt on social media It just showing hypocrisy of all of this

nah, ofc not. No one cares about 'abused' guys by wamen

Karma si a b1tch #shetoo http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6086009/Asia-Argento-admits-DID-sex-17-year-old-Jimmy-Bennett-texts.html

OG, what a game, awesome, my team are doing it!

Yeah I want to see it and its soooo effing late at night for me "/

How you can tell he is wealthy from his profile? Anyway OG are rolling!

Yep, Liquid is running hot

OG are my wild card

Impartial reporters is, has always been and will always be an oxymoron and expecting or demanding anything else is the mark of only the last part of that word. Cherry picking much?

How many articles were comparing previouse presidents to Hitler? Well Obama typically got compared to socialists, Bush got the village idiot labels, and Clinton got the Jerry Springer cheater treatment. I am pretty sure even you can see that being called cheater (and in the end rightfully so) is not same as being called Nazi holocaust supporter

How many articles were comparing previouse presidents to Hitler?

Lol, if you think that 'right' wing media are responsible for Trump you are delusional xD I didn't say that, just that the right has their hand in creating the anti-media atmosphere. He seems to get what I meant. Hah, i will put in rough google translate from article in local media: ANALYSIS: The media have their own Jihad against Trump The 350 American newspapers agreed and on an editorial comment on Thursday revealed how horrible the president is to the media. It's as hysterically over the top as the American media's whole approach to Trump. They do the same thing he does. This destroys them. it does not look like it, but it's a dismal look. Here are some captions of recent headlines. Washington Post: It's no mistake to compare Trump's America to the Holocaust. New York Times: Trump's Way to Martial Law in America. Washington Post: Trump spreads racism with fighter pilot accuracy. NBC has compared the summit with Putin to the Crystal Night, the internet magazine Slate has invited a German historian to seriously ask him whether Trump's US has changed into something similar to Nazi Germany (the historian: "It's not"). Just in July, the three articles of the New York Times on Trump referred to Nazism or neo-Nazism, with dozens associating it with racists. The search engine in this worksheet on Thursday, when entering the slogans "Trump" and "Nazi", has spawned 1,812 articles. And once again the New York Times, though not far from the most jaded: the electronic version of the opinion column includes a cartoon in which the smelly and defiant Trump meets half-naked Putin, later they are both just in slips, kissing, tangling tongues and splashing saliva is seen in detail, as if from the inside. What would have happened if Trump had sent something like this to his opponents? That's the problem. Journalists who complain about Trump's statements about the media ("fake news") prove slowly with each other the word that he has a lot of truth. Impartial reporters have become activists The initiators of Thursday's event emphasized that no US president had been so horrible in the media. But same applies to them. The media in the US are in a schizophrenic situation. Trump feeds them, getting them big revenue, yet they wants to destroy him. During the campaign, they(media) grazed, did not take him seriously, he was just a clown, but then they found out that anything about Trump would raise their audience and load (reading count). So, the more, the better. The media helped make Trump - and when the clown won the election, they was afraid. The American journalism, whose quality, while lying behind the legend but still one of the best in the world, has become a cartoon. Impartial reporters have become activists. they do not report about Trump, they are fighting against him. Objectivity went aside, fueled by bias, bending facts, and a double standards. Messages are masked personal attitudes of the editors. For the one who watches the American press every day, it is daunting to see how the juvenile is at one hand and how they violates the rules that were holy. Only a hunt without rules remained. Shattered distortion, childish catching for the word, neglect of irony and its explanation as literal. The situation is so bad that the media publicly condemns journalist guru Bob Woodward from the Watergate affair. When Trump separates migrant children from parents and guides, the media prints their pictures in "cages" that have been photographed during Obama reign and abhore them as"Trump's concentration camps." While during Obama presidency no one mind about it. When the psychopath fired the local newspaper because they did not want to publish an apology for years about him, the Trump was to blame becaus he insult media, which the Washington Post congratulated by sentence: "We are approaching the day the blood in the editorial will be blood on the President's hands." No one is contemplating that than someone might try to shoot Trump. The struggle with the president has become an obsession There is no question that somebody should denie Trump access to Twitter and instruct Valium when he is about to talk about the media because he is hurting himself and nurturing the crisis. He picked up a thrown glove because the media had evaluated his victory as a mistake to correct. Washington Post puts a blown-up motto "The truth is dying in the darkness" and the New York Times on Thursday came out with the headline "Free Press" needs you. They have a little truth. They're under fire. But this war of extermination is depicted unilaterally because of the media that depict it. The struggle with an unexpected president has become an obsession, and then a disease that eats even the best titles. Fighting Trump is dangerously vivid. American press and television have the lowest credibility in history. Trying to get Trump came back as a boomerang. Trump accuses the media of printing fake news, and they responded with such childish stubbornes that most Americans really think about them that they are actually printing fake news. The 350 head lines will not change it, even if they are over-confident. I Can't agree more, and news from which it is is quite left leaning and very progressive source: https://zpravy.idnes.cz/donald-trump-media-milan-vodicka-analyza-fdy-/zahranicni.aspx?c=A180817_421285_zahranicni_aha

Lol, if you think that 'right' wing media are responsible for Trump you are delusional xD

Well yes and no. I am not expert in that field your behaviour is largely affected by chemicals in your body, some pople just have slighlty different mix in them. Pump someone with steroids and they became more aggresive for example

I have told that desire is instinct or primal urge, i think its same even for deviants, ti does not mean we as society should tolerate or accept it. I think you confuse validation as primal urge versus validation as ok in our socitey

to first question: primal survival instinct is to procrastinate yes it does not mean that organisms does not evolve into blind twigs on tree of life as society we learned that some of our primal insticts are no longer acceptable and/or needs to be controlled if we want to survive as community, society and later civilizations. There are gay animals - ninjed

and I thought desire is animalistic, turns out someone told me to get errections

That is pretty bolsy statement, I think some cannibals in amazonia would disagree with ya Also are you saying that budhists are immoral if they dont have god? Or that they don't have concept of good and evil? They have there own customs for living and surviving includes cannabalism. Cannabalism is learned, not instinct. If someone in the tribe steals something from another member, there would be consequences. Buddhists have an idol, whether they admit they worship buddha or not is up to them but they bow to a statue and look at scripture, same as catholics bowing to the virgin mary. So any idol is fine? Like money? Seems like you cherry pick what is learned and what is instinct. For someone who is hungry stealing food is instinct, yet the one who got robbed will not like it. Shagging anything which moves is instinct yet most religions does not support it or deem it 'good'

That is pretty bolsy statement, I think some cannibals in amazonia would disagree with ya Also are you saying that budhists are immoral if they dont have god? Or that they don't have concept of good and evil?

watching TI8

Sometimes you make sense and then you state that Tylor Swift is great artists, I never know with you...