kumquatq3

I get the impression, aside from a select few, that MMO's have a pretty high failure rate.

No, that's when Freddy comes! :ph34r:

It was good, but it was a bit heavy on the "I'm going to die.....no I'm not" moments. Kinda killed the drama of it all. and how come they can never keep the SDL drives online?

He said Sayid's "got it" and he was standing right next to them

I'm ha;f way through with the episode, was anyone else half expecting Ecko to be hanging upside down from the ceiling (legs in ice) reaching out for his club with a Wampa waiting to eat him

In Locke we trust

Are you really curious or is it that you wanted to sound deep?

Yep, someone dropped a pretty penny for some CG The ramming scene was the shizznit

The Original Crimson Skies I finally had a chance to play the X-box sequel and was very dissapointed. It threw out the depth of the original (dumb it down for the Box), the quality voice acting ("jokes" constantly fell flat), and the setting (Giant Mech-Spiders from Wild Wild West). I mean they pulled a Silent Storm and went sci-fi with it. By itself it's a ok game, but man, way to kill a good premise.

interesting read

Let us see what patches bring This is sounding like V:TM type of problems. IE maybe it becomes great post-patches.

Mike, Dark Prince of the Damned Mike, The Destroyer Mike & Ike....of the Damned!

You'll always be Doomy to me

I said "A-List TV people". TV. Some of the actors are stars on some of the hottest shows on televsion So bite me. I win. You lose.

It could mean ALOT of things, but I pulled it anyways

http://pc.ign.com/articles/740/740026p1.html

This may be the most important thing ever to happen to the World......of Warcraft

Wait....those three games made the list of top 100 of all time? Yea.... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Half-Life was 88 or thereabouts, seems like a stunted list if you ask me. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Beaten by FOUR different, and recent, football games, no less. Starcraft gets beaten by Call of Duty and WWE SmackDown vs. RAW 2006, among several others? bah. Stupid short term memories.

In my usuage of "basically a rookie", I'd say so. I'm refering to their expirence/playtime, rather than thier first year. He's making "rookie" mistakes. Obviously, by the book, you are correct.This is not his offical rookie year. I still don't see it. How is 5 MVP type games + 1 horrible game = free ride? I mean, the back ups (damn rookies) have free rides, Grossman has to go out and play.

do we have offical system specs?

Wait....those three games made the list of top 100 of all time? Yea....

His game was pathetic. Not arguing that. Just stating he is not the sole reason for the performance. Where was the running game? His season so far is still one of the best in the NFL. Saying otherwise is foolish. I'm sorry one performance taints your perception of the overall season. And when did anyones perception of "deserving" have anything to do with who gets to and wins the superbowl? I'm sorry one of the possible eventual winners of the superbowl may not have earned it in your eyes! I know the Bears will see their eventually victory as a empty one, I assure you. Maybe next year.... And his recievers dropped 5 balls I can remember, two of them for first downs. and I call him a "rookie" because he has never had a streak of more than 3 full games back to back till this season. IIRC, six games before this season, over the course of several seasons. He has spent more time in rehabilitation than on the football field.

http://www.wwtdd.com/post.phtml?pk=1470 HOLY CRAP! (nut so much funny as unnearving)

One's a present. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Awwwwww, I didn't know you cared